Environmental proteomics: Analysis of structure and function of microbial communities

Proteomics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 785-798

  Schneider, Thomas ^a   Riedel, Kathrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Community function; Community structure; Environmental proteomics; Microbial ecology; Microbiology

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GROUND WATER;

ACID MINE DRAINAGE; BIOFILM; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ESTUARY; FIBROBACTER SUCCINOGENES; GENOMICS; ISOPTERA; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; METABOLOMICS; METAGENOMICS; METHYLOBACTERIUM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; OCEAN ENVIRONMENT; PIROMYCES; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEOMICS; PSEUDOMONAS; REVIEW; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; SLUDGE; SOIL WATER CONTENT; SPHINGOMONAS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES; FUNGAL PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 77149152780     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900450     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Brock, T. D., The study of microorganisms in situ: progress and problems. Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol. 1987, 41, 1-17.
2. Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K. H., Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 143-169.
3. Schloss, P. D., Handelsman, J., Toward a census of bacteria in soil. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2, e92.
4. Vieites, J. M., Guazzaroni, M. E., Beloqui, A., Golyshin, P. N., Ferrer, M., Metagenomics approaches in systems microbiology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 236-255.
5. Cardenas, E., Tiedje, J. M., New tools for discovering and characterizing microbial diversity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 544-549.
6. Singh, J., Behal, A., Singla, N., Joshi, A. et al., Metagenomics: concept, methodology, ecological inference and recent advances. Biotechnol. J. 2009, 4, 480-494.
7. Keller, M., Hettich, R., Environmental proteomics: a paradigm shift in characterizing microbial activities at the molecular level. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2009, 73, 62-70.
8. Wilmes, P., Bond, P. L., Microbial community proteomics: elucidating the catalysts and metabolic mechanisms that drive the Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 310-317.
9. VerBerkmoes, N. C., Denef, V. J., Hettich, R. L., Banfield, J. F., Systems biology: functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 196-205.
10. Lacerda, C. M., Reardon, K. F., Environmental proteomics: applications of proteome profiling in environmental microbiology and biotechnology. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2009, 8, 75-87.
11. Lopez-Barea, J., Gomez-Ariza, J. L., Environmental proteomics and metallomics. Proteomics 2006, 6, 51-62.
12. Schulze, W. X., Environmental proteomics - what proteins from soil and surface water can tell us: a perspective. Biogeosci. Discuss. 2004, 1, 195-218.
13. Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L. et al., Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 2004, 304, 66-74.
14. Markowitz, V. M., Ivanova, N. N., Szeto, E., Palaniappan, K. et al., IMG/M: a data management and analysis system for metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D534-538.
15. Pignatelli, M., Aparicio, G., Blanquer, I., Hernandez, V. et al., Metagenomics reveals our incomplete knowledge of global diversity. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2124-2125.
16. Tringe, S. G., Rubin, E. M., Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nat. Rev. 2005, 6, 805-814.
17. Tringe, S. G., von Mering, C., Kobayashi, A., Salamov, A. A. et al., Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 2005, 308, 554-557.
18. Denef, V. J., VerBerkmoes, N. C., Shah, M. B., Abraham, P. et al., Proteomics-inferred genome typing (PIGT) demonstrates interpopulation recombination as a strategy for environmental adaptation. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 313-325.
19. Goltsman, D. S. A., Denef, V. J., Singer, S.W., VerBerkmoes, N. C. et al., Community genomic and proteomic analysis of chemoautotrophic, iron-oxidizing "Leptospirillum rubarum" (Group II) and Leptospirillum ferrodiazotrophum (Group III) in acid mine drainage biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 4599-4615.
20. Lo, I., Denef, V. J., Verberkmoes, N. C., Shah, M. B. et al., Strain-resolved community proteomics reveals recombining genomes of acidophilic bacteria. Nature 2007, 446, 537-541.
21. Wilmes, P., Andersson, A. F., Lefsrud, M. G., Wexler, M. et al., Community proteogenomics highlights microbial strain-variant protein expression within activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal. ISME J. 2008, 2, 853-864.
22. Delmotte, N., Knief, C., Chaffron, S., Innerebner, G. et al., Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16428-16433.
23. Ahmadian, A., Ehn, M., Hober, S., Pyrosequencing: history, biochemistry and future. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 363, 83-94.
24. Zhou, J., Thompson, D. K., Challenges in applying microarrays to environmental studies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 204-207.
25. Wilkins, M. R., Sanchez, J. C., Gooley, A. A., Appel, R. D. et al., Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 1995, 13, 19-50.
26. O'Farrell, P. H., High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4007-4021.
27. Bochner, B. R., Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 191-205.
28. Wilmes, P., Bond, P. L., The application of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 911-920.
29. Maron, P. A., Ranjard, L., Mougel, C., Lemanceau, P., Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying functional microbial ecology. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 53, 486-493.
30. Toyoda, A., Iio, W., Mitsumori, M., Minato, H., Isolation and identification of cellulose-binding proteins from sheep rumen contents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1667-1673.
31. Warnecke, F., Luginb . uhl, P., Ivanova, N., Ghassemian, M. et al., Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 2007, 450, 560-565.
32. Sowell, S. M., Wilhelm, L. J., Norbeck, A. D., Lipton, M. S. et al., Transport functions dominate the SAR11 metaproteome at low-nutrient extremes in the Sargasso Sea. ISME J. 2009, 3, 93-105.
33. Markert, S., Arndt, C., Felbeck, H., Becher, D. et al., Physiological proteomics of the uncultured endosymbiont of Riftia pachyptila. Science 2007, 315, 247-250.
34. Verberkmoes, N. C., Russell, A. L., Shah, M., Godzik, A. et al., Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota. ISME J. 2009, 3, 179-189.
35. Ram, R. J., VerBerkmoes, N. C., Thelen, M. P., Tyson, G. W. et al., Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm. Science 2005, 308, 1915-1920.
36. Wilmes, P., Wexler, M., Bond, P. L., Metaproteomics provides functional insight into activated sludge wastewater treatment. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1778.
37. Singleton, I., Merrington, G., Colvan, S., Delahunty, J. S., The potential of soil protein-based methods to indicate metal contamination Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 23, 25-32.
38. Schulze, W. X., Gleixner, G., Kaiser, K., Guggenberger, G. et al., A proteomic fingerprint of dissolved organic carbon and of soil particles. Oecologia 2005, 142, 335-343.
39. Benndorf, D., Balcke, G. U., Harms, H., von Bergen, M., Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. ISME J. 2007, 1, 224-234.
40. Benndorf, D., Vogt, C., Jehmlich, N., Schmidt, Y. et al., Improving protein extraction and separation methods for investigating the metaproteome of anaerobic benzene communities within sediments. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 737-750.
41. Görg, A., Weiss, W., Dunn, M. J., Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4, 3665-3685.
42. Klose, J., Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik 1975, 26, 231-243.
43. Ünlü, M., Morgan, M. E., Minden, J. S., Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2071-2077.
44. Lane, C. S., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in the life sciences. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 848-869.
45. Motoyama, A., Yates, J. R., III, Multidimensional LC separations in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7187-7193.
46. Peng, J., Gygi, S. P., Proteomics: the move to mixtures. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 36, 1083-1091.
47. Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D., Yates, J. R., III, arge-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotech. 2001, 19, 242-247.
48. Chait, B. T., CHEMISTRY: Mass Spectrometry: Bottom-Up or Top-Down? Science 2006, 314, 65-66.
49. Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., Chait, B. T., Matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 1193A-1203A.
50. Fenn, J. B., Mann, M.,Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., Whitehouse, C. M., Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 1989, 246, 64-71.
51. Marshall, A. G., Hendrickson, C. L., Jackson, G. S., Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: A primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1998, 17, 1-35.
52. Hu,Q.,Noll, R. J., Li, H.,Makarov,A. et al., The Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 430-443.
53. Klaassens, E. S., de Vos, W. M., Vaughan, E. E., Metaproteomics approach to study the functionality of the microbiota in the human infant gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1388-1392.
54. Lacerda, C. M., Choe, L. H., Reardon, K. F., Metaproteomic analysis of a bacterial community response to cadmium exposure. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1145-1152.
55. Park, C., Helm, R. F., Novak, J. T., Investigating the fate of activated sludge extracellular proteins in sludge digestion using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Water Environ. Res. 2008, 80, 2219-2227.
56. Kan, J., Hanson, T. E., Ginter, J. M., Wang, K., Chen, F., Metaproteomic analysis of Chesapeake Bay microbial communities. Saline Syst. 2005, 1, 7.
57. Wilkins, M. J., Verberkmoes, N. C., Williams, K. H., Callister, S. J. et al., Proteogenomic monitoring of Geobacter physiology during stimulated uranium bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6591-6599.
58. Wilmes, P., Bond, P. L., Metaproteomics: studying functional gene expression in microbial ecosystems. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 92-97.
59. Hunt, D. F., Yates, J. R., III, Shabanowitz, J., Winston, S., Hauer, C. R., Protein sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 6233-6237.
60. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
61. Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Yates, J. R., III, An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
62. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
63. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Vitek, O., Aebersold, R., Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 787-797.
64. Mann, M.,Wilm, M., Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal. Chem. 2002, 66, 4390-4399.
65. Ma, B., Zhang, K., Hendrie, C., Liang, C. et al., PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2337-2342.
66. Demine, R., Walden, P., Sequit: software for de novo peptide sequencing by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization post-source decay mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18, 907-913.
67. Frank, A., Pevzner, P., PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 964-973.
68. Tabb, D. L., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R., DTASelect and contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1, 21-26.
69. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658.
70. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
71. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2306-2310.
72. Gilchrist, A., Au, C. E., Hiding, J., Bell, A. W. et al., Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway. Cell 2006, 127, 1265-1281.
73. Florens, L., Carozza, M. J., Swanson, S. K., Fournier, M. et al., Analyzing chromatin remodeling complexes using shotgun proteomics and normalized spectral abundance factors. Methods 2006, 40, 303-311.
74. Zybailov, B., Mosley, A. L., Sardiu, M. E., Coleman, M. K. et al., Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 2339-2347.
75. Robidart, J. C., Bench, S. R., Feldman, R. A., Novoradovsky, A. et al., Metabolic versatility of the Riftia pachyptila endosymbiont revealed through metagenomics. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 727-737.
76. Garcia Martin, H., Ivanova, N., Kunin, V., Warnecke, F. et al., Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1263-1269.
77. Wei, J., Sun, J., Yu, W., Jones, A. et al., Global proteome discovery using an online three-dimensional LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 801-808.
78. Bantscheff, M., Schirle, M., Sweetman, G., Rick, J., Kuster, B., Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1017-1031.
79. Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F. et al., Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotopecoded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 994-999.
80. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
81. Panchaud, A., Hansson, J., Affolter, M., Bel Rhlid, R. et al., ANIBAL, stable isotope-based quantitative proteomics by aniline and benzoic acid labeling of amino and carboxylic groups. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 800-812.
82. Choi, H., Fermin, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 2373-2385.
83. Ono, M., Shitashige, M., Honda, K., Isobe, T. et al., Label-free quantitative proteomics using large peptide data sets generated by nanoflow liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 1338-1347.