Kurt Lewin's field theory: A review and re-evaluation

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 408-425

  Burnes, Bernard ^a   Cooke, Bill ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884975521     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: 14682370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Allport, G.W. (1948). Foreword. In Lewin, G.W. (ed.), Resolving Social Conflict - Selected Papers on Group Dynamics by Kurt Lewin. London: Harper & Row, pp. vii-xiv.
2. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Argyris, C. (1997). Kurt Lewin award lecture: field theory as a basis for scholarly consulting. Journal of Social Issues, 53, pp. 811-827.
4. Arnheim, R. (1986). The two faces of Gestalt psychology. American Psychologist, 41, pp. 820-824.
5. Back, K.W. (1992). This business of topology. Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 51-66.
6. Bargal, D. (1998). Kurt Lewin and the first attempts to establish a department of psychology at the Hebrew University. Minerva, 36, pp. 49-68.
7. Bargal, D., Gold, M. and Lewin, M. (1992). Introduction: the heritage of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 3-13.
8. Bartunek, J. (2007). Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp. 1323-1333.
9. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (eds) (2000). Breaking the Code of Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Block, J., Buss, D.M., Block, J.H. and Gjerde, P.F. (1981). The cognitive style of breadth of categorization: longitudinal consistency of personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, pp. 770-779.
11. Boje, D. and Rosile, G.A. (2010). Lewin's Action Research Meets Aristotle on the Storytelling Field: Maybe It's a Distinctive Niche for CTU. Colorado Springs, CO: Colorado Technical University.
12. Boje, D., DuRant, I., Coppedge, K., Chambers, T. and Marcillo-Gomez, M. (2011). Social materiality: a new direction in change management and action research. In Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. London: Routledge, pp. 580-597.
13. Bozan, M.G. (2003). Using Lewin's force field analysis in implementing a nursing information system. CIM: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21, pp. 80-85.
14. Brager, G. and Holloway, S. (1993). Assessing prospects for organizational change. Administration in Social Work, 16, pp. 15-28.
15. Burnes, B. (2004a). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, pp. 977-1002.
16. Burnes, B. (2004b). Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: back to the future? Journal of Change Management, 4, pp. 309-325.
17. Burnes, B. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: the foundations of OD. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, pp. 213-231.
18. Burnes, B. (2009). Managing Change. Harlow: FT/Prentice Hall.
19. Burnes, B. and By, R.T. (2012). Leadership and change: the case for greater ethical clarity. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, pp. 239-252.
20. Burnes, B. and Cooke, B. (2012). The past, present and future of organization development: taking the long view. Human Relations, published online 4 July 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0018726712450058.
21. Bushe, G. (2001). Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In Cooperrider, D., Sorenson, P., Whitney, D. and Yeager, T. (eds), Appreciative Inquiry. Champaign, IL: Stipes, pp. 117-127.
22. Bushe, G. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: theory and critique. In Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. London: Routledge, pp. 87-103.
23. Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952a). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks.
24. Cartwright, D. (1952b). Foreword. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. vii-xv.
25. Cartwright, D. and Festinger, L. (1943). A quantitative theory of decision. Psychological Review, 50, pp. 595-621.
26. Cassell, C. and Johnson, P. (2006). Action research: explaining diversity. Human Relations, 59, pp. 783-814.
27. Coghlan, D. and Jacobs, C. (2005). Kurt Lewin on re-education; foundations for action research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, pp. 444-457.
28. Cooke, B. (2006). The Cold War origins of action research as managerialist cooptation. Human Relations, 59, pp. 665-693.
29. Cooke, B. (2007). The Kurt Lewin/Goodwin Watson FBI files: a 60th anniversary 'there and then' of the 'here and now. Human Relations, 60, pp. 435-462.
30. Cronshaw, S.F. and McCulloch, A.N.A. (2008). Reinstating the Lewinian vision: from force field analysis to organization field assessment. Organization Development Journal, 26, pp. 89-103.
31. Cummings, T.G. and Huse, E.F. (1989). Organization Development and Change, 4th edn. St Paul, MN: West.
32. Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C.G. (2005). Organization Development and Change, 8th edn. Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
33. Danziger, K. (1992). The project of an experimental social psychology: historical perspectives. Science in Context, 5, pp. 309-328.
34. Danziger, K. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: a conceptual history, 1920-1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, pp. 329-347.
35. Dent, E.B. and Goldberg, S.G. (1999). Challenging resistance to change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, pp. 25-41.
36. Depanfilis, D. (1996). Implementing child mistreatment risk assessment systems: lessons from theory. Administration in Social Work, 20, pp. 41-49.
37. Deutsch, M. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison - Wesley, pp. 412-487.
38. Diamond, G.A. (1992). Field theory and rational choice: a Lewinian approach to modelling motivation. Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 79-94.
39. Dickens, L. and Watkins, K. (1999). Action research: rethinking Lewin. Management Learning, 30, pp. 127-140.
40. Elrod, P.D. II and Tippett, D.D. (2002). The 'Death Valley' of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, pp. 273-291.
41. Elsass, P.M. and Veiga, J.F. (1994). Acculturation in acquired organizations: a force-field perspective. Human Relations, 47, pp. 431-453.
42. Festinger, L. (1949). The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra. Human Relations, 2, pp. 153-158.
43. French, W.L. and Bell, C.H. (1984). Organization Development, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. French, W.L. and Bell, C.H. (1990). Organization Development, 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Garrett, H.E. (1939). Lewin's 'topological' psychology; an evaluation. Psychological Review, 46, pp. 517-524.
46. Gold, M. (1992). Metatheory and field theory in social psychology: relevance or elegance? Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 67-78.
47. Gold, M. (ed.) (1999). The Complete Social Scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Greiner, L.E. and Cummings, T.G. (2004). Wanted: OD more alive than dead! Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, pp. 374-391.
49. Gulati, R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: the rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, pp. 775-782.
50. Hall, C.S. and Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of Personality, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley.
51. Hannagan, T. (2007). Management: Concepts and Practices, 5th edn. Harlow: FT/Prentice Hall.
52. Hatch, M.J. (1997). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Hendry, C. (1996). Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory. Human Relations, 48, pp. 621-641.
54. Hirschhorn, L. (1988). The Workplace Within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Hodgkinson, G.P. and Rousseau, D.M. (2009). Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: it's already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp. 534-546.
56. Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2009). Organizational Behaviour, 6th edn. Harlow: FT/Prentice Hall.
57. Kadar, E.E. and Shaw, R.E. (2000). Toward an ecological field theory of perceptual control of locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 12, pp. 141-180.
58. Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A. and Jick, T.D. (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change. New York: Free Press.
59. Kathan-Selck, C. and van Offenbeek, M. (2011). Redrawing medical professional domains: new doctors, shifting boundaries, and traditional force fields. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 25, pp. 73-93.
60. Kippenberger, T. (1998). Planned change: Kurt Lewin's legacy. The Antidote, 3, pp. 10-12.
61. Kleiner, A. (1996). The Age of Heretics: Heroes, Outlaws and Forerunners of Corporate Change. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
62. Köhler, W. (1967). Gestalt psychology. Psychological Research, 31, pp. XVIII-XXX.
63. Lan, L.L. and Lee, J. (1997). Force-field analysis on policies affecting working women in Singapore. Journal of Management Development, 16, pp. 43-52.
64. Lewin, G.W. (1948). Preface. In Lewin, G.W. (ed.), Resolving Social Conflict - Selected Papers on Group Dynamics by Kurt Lewin. London: Harper & Row, pp. xv-xviii.
65. Lewin, K. (1929). Two fundamental types of life processes. In Gold, M. (ed.), (1999) The Complete Social Scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 117-136.
66. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. York, PA: McGraw-Hill.
67. Lewin, K. (1938). The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
68. Lewin, K. (1939a). Experiments in social space. Reprinted in Reflections, 1997, 1, pp. 7-13.
69. Lewin, K. (1939b). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44, pp. 868-896.
70. Lewin, K. (1940a). Formalization and progress in psychology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 1-28.
71. Lewin, K. (1940b). The background of conflict in marriage. In Lewin, G.W. (ed.), (1948) Resolving Social Conflict - Selected Papers on Group Dynamics by Kurt Lewin. London: Harper & Row, pp. 84-102.
72. Lewin, K. (1942). Field theory and learning. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 60-86.
73. Lewin, K. (1943a). Defining the 'Field at a given time'. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 43-59.
74. Lewin, K. (1943b). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council, 108, pp. 35-65.
75. Lewin, K. (1943c). Psychological ecology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 17-187.
76. Lewin, K. (1943-44). Problems of research in social psychology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, p. 169.
77. Lewin, K. (1944). Constructs in field theory. In Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 30-42.
78. Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics. In Cartwright, D. (ed.) (1952) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Social Science Paperbacks, pp. 188-237.
79. Lewin, K. (1947b). Group decisions and social change. In Newcomb, T.M. and Hartley, E.L. (eds) (1959) Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Henry Holt, pp. 330-344.
80. Lewin, K. (1949). Cassirer's philosophy of science and the social sciences. In Gold, M. (ed.) (1999) The Complete Social Scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 23-36.
81. Lewin, K. and Lorsch, K. (1939). Mathematical constructs in psychology and sociology. Journal of Unified Science, 9, pp. 397-403.
82. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and White, R.K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, pp. 271-299.
83. Lewin, M. (1998). Kurt Lewin: his psychology and a daughter's recollections. In Kimble, G.A. and Wertheimer, M. (eds), Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology, Vol. 3. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 105-120.
84. Liden, R.C. and Antonakis, J. (2009). Considering context in psychological leadership. Human Relations, 62, pp. 1587-1605.
85. Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds) (1985). Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edn. New York: Random House.
86. Lippitt, R. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: autocratic and democratic group atmospheres. American Journal of Sociology, 45, pp. 26-49.
87. London, I.D. (1944). Psychologists' misuse of the auxiliary concepts of physics and mathematics. Psychological Review, 51, pp. 266-291.
88. Marion, L.S. (2002). A tri-citation analysis exploring the citation image of Kurt Lewin. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39, pp. 3-13.
89. Marrow, A.J. (1969). The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin, 1977 edn. New York: Teachers College Press
90. Martin, J.L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109, pp. 1-49.
91. Mendelson, B. (1990). Introduction to Topology, 3rd edn. Mineola, NY: Dover.
92. Merton, R.K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, pp. 894-904.
93. Mozenter, J. (2002). Recent research links: macro forces, emerging trends and OD's expanding role. Organization Development Journal, 20, pp. 48-57.
94. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2008). Quality and Service Improvement Tools: Force Field Analysis. Available at http://www.institute.nhs.uk (accessed 5 August 2012).
95. ODI (2009). Force Field Analysis. Available at http://www.odi.org.uk/rapid/tools/toolkits/communication/Forcefield_analysis.html (accessed 5 August 2012).
96. Oreg, S., Vakola, M. and Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients' reactions to organizational change: a 60-year review of quantitative studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, pp. 461-524.
97. Oswick, C. (2009). Revisioning or re-versioning?: a commentary on diagnostic and dialogic forms of organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, pp. 369-374.
98. Pettigrew, A.M. (1985). The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. Oxford: Blackwell.
99. Polzer, J.T., Gulati, R. and Khurana, R. (2009). Crossing boundaries to increase relevance in organizational research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, pp. 280-286.
100. Ramos, C.V.Q. and Rees, C.J. (2008). The current state of organization development: organization perspectives from Western Europe. Organization Development Journal, 26, pp. 67-80.
101. Rock, I. and Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific America, 263(6), pp. 48-61.
102. Rogers, P., Meehan, P. and Tanner, S. (2006). Building a Winning Culture. Boston, MA: Bain.
103. Rummel, R.J. (1975). Understanding Conflict and War, Vol. 1: The Dynamic Psychological Field. London: Sage.
104. Schein, E. (1997). Commentary to experiments in social space (1939) - Kurt Lewin. Reflections, 1, pp. 7-8.
105. Schein, E.H. (1988). Organizational Psychology, 3rd edn. London: Prentice Hall.
106. Schein, E.H. (1996). Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: notes towards a model of management learning. Systems Practice, 9, pp. 27-47.
107. Schultz, M. (2010). Reconciling pragmatism and scientific rigor. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, pp. 274-277.
108. Schwering, R.E. (2003). Focusing leadership through force field analysis: new variations on a venerable planning tool. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, pp. 361-370.
109. Senior, B. (2002). Organisational Change, 2nd edn. London: Pitman.
110. Senturia, T., Flees, L. and Maceda, M. (2008). Leading Change Management Requires Sticking to the PLOT. London: Bain.
111. Smith, B. (1994). Topological foundations of cognitive science. In Eschenbach, C., Habel, C. and Smith, B. (eds), Topological Foundations of Cognitive Science. Hamburg: Graduiertenkolleg Kognitionswissenschaft [Graduate Program in Cognitive Science], University of Hamburg, pp. 3-22.
112. Smith, C. and Gemmill, G. (1991). Change in small groups: a dissipative structure perspective. Human Relations, 44, pp. 697-716.
113. Smith, M., Beck, J., Cooper, C.L., Cox, C., Ottaway, D. and Talbot, R. (1982). Introducing Organizational Behaviour. London: Macmillan.
114. Stiglitz, J. (2010). Freefall: Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy. London: Allen Lane.
115. Tennant, C. and Roberts, P. (2001). Hoshin Kanri: implementing the catchball process. Long Range Planning, 34, pp. 287-308.
116. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S.G. and Shastree, A. (2006). Total quality management (TQM) in self-financed technical institutions: a quality function deployment (QFD) and force field analysis approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 14, pp. 54-74.
117. Tolman, E. (1948). Kurt Lewin (1890-1947). Psychological Review, 55, pp. 1-4.
118. Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, pp. 567-582.
119. Van Nistelrooij, A. and Sminia, H. (2010). Organization development: what's actually happening? Journal of Change Management, 10, pp. 393-405.
120. Weisbord, M. (1987). Productive Workplaces. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
121. Wheeler, L. (2008). Kurt Lewin. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, pp. 638-1650.
122. Wirtenberg, J., Lipsky, D., Abrams, L., Conway, M. and Slepian, J. (2007). The future of organization development: enabling sustainable business performance through people. Organization Development Journal, 25, pp. 7-22.