Action research: Explaining the diversity

Human Relations

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 783-814

  Cassell, Catherine ^a   Johnson, Phil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action research; Epistemology; Methodology; Ontology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745608065     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: 1741282X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726706067080     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Abel, T. The operation called verstehen. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 54, 211 - 218.
2. Acker, J., Barry, K. & Esseveld, J. Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991, pp. 133 - 153.
3. Agocs, C. Institutionalized resistance to organizational change: Denial inaction and repression. Journal of Business Ethics, 1997, 23 (9). 917 - 931.
4. Aguinis, H. Action research and scientific method: Presumed discrepancies and actual similarities. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 1993, 29 (4) (Special Issue), 416 - 431.
5. Alvesson, M. & Deetz, S. Doing critical management research. London: Sage, 2000.
6. Alvesson, M. & Skoldberg, K. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage, 2000.
7. Arbib, M.A. & Hesse, M.B. The construction of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
8. Argyris, C. Inner contradictions of rigorous research. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
9. Argyris, C. Knowledge for action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
10. Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A. Participatory action research and action science compared. American Behavioural Scientist, 1989, 32 (5). 612 - 623.
11. Argyris, C., Putnam, R. & Smith, D.M. Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
12. Barrett, P.A. The early mothering project: What happened when 'action research' came to life for a group of midwives. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 294 - 300.
13. Barry, D. Telling changes: From narrative family therapy to organizational change and development. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1997, 10 (1). 30 - 46.
14. Barry, D. & Elmes, M. Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22 (2). 429 - 452.
15. Baudrillard, J. Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983.
16. Baudrillard, J. Baudrillard live: Selected interviews, Ed. M. Gane. London: Routledge, 1993.
17. Beck, U. The risk society: Towards a new modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
18. Beck, U. World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. Theory, Culture & Society, 1996, 13 (4). 1 - 32.
19. Beer, M. & Walton, A. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Action Research Psychology, 1987, 38, 339 - 367.
20. Berg, P.O. Postmodern management? From facts to fiction in theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1989, 5 (3). 201 - 217.
21. Bernstein, R.J. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1983.
22. Bertalanffy, L. The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 1950, 3, 22 - 29.
23. Bhaskar, R. A realist theory of science, 2nd edn. Brighton: Harvester, 1978.
24. Bion, W. The leaderless group project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1946, 10, 77 - 81.
25. Bochner, A.P. Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 2000, 6 (2). 266 - 272.
26. Bradbury, H. Learning with the natural step: Action research to promote conversations for sustainable development. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 307 - 313.
27. Brief, A.P. & Dukerich, J.M. Theory in organizational behavior: Can it be useful? Research in Organizational Behavior, 1991, 13, 327 - 352.
28. Burnes, B. Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41 (6). 977 - 1002.
29. Cassell, C. & Fitter, M. Responding to a changing environment: An action research case study. In D. Hosking & N.R. Anderson (Eds), Organizational change and innovation. London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 288 - 304.
30. Cassell, C.M. & Symon, G. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage, 2004.
31. Chandler, D. & Torbert, B. Transforming inquiry and action: Interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Research, 2003, 1 (2). 133 - 152.
32. Checkland, P. From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research. In H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein & R. Hirscheim (Eds), Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science, 1991, pp. 397 - 403.
33. Chia, R. From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 1995, 16 (4). 579 - 604.
34. Chia, R. Metaphors and metaphorization in organizational analysis: Thinking beyond the thinkable. In D. Grant & C. Oswick (Eds), Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996, pp. 127 - 146.
35. Cicourel, A.V. Interviews surveys and the problem of ecological validity. American Sociologist, 1982, 17, 11 - 20.
36. Coghlan, D. & Brannick, T. Doing action research in your own organization. London: Sage, 2001.
37. Collier, A. In defence of epistemology. Radical Philosophy, 1979, 20, 8 - 21.
38. Comte, A. The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. London: Chapman, 1853.
39. Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. Quasi experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1979.
40. Cooper, R. & Burrell, G. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 1988, 9, 91 - 112.
41. Cooperrider, D.L. & Srivastva, S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. Woodman & W. Pasmore (Eds), Research in organizational change and development. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1987, pp. 129 - 169.
42. Cullen, J. The needle and the damage done: Research, action research, and the organizational and social construction of health in the 'information society'. Human Relations, 1998, 51 (12). 1543 - 1564.
43. DeTardo-Bora, K.A. Action research in a world of positivist oriented review boards. Action Research, 2004, 23 (3). 237 - 253.
44. Denzin, N.K. The logic of naturalistic inquiry. Social Forces, 1970, 50, 166 - 182.
45. Denzin, N.K. The art and politics of interpretation. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1994, pp. 500 - 515.
46. Dewey, J. The quest for certainty. New York: Milton Bach, 1929.
47. Dickens, L. & Watkins, K. Action research: Rethinking Lewin. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 127 - 140.
48. Eden, M. & Huxham, C. Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 1996, 7 (1). 75 - 86.
49. Elden, M. & Chisholm, R.F. Emergent varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 1993, 46 (1). 121 - 142.
50. Fay, B. Critical social science. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
51. Foucault, M. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
52. Friere, P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972a.
53. Friere, P. Cultural action for freedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972b.
54. Gaventa, J. & Cornwall, A. Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 70 - 80.
55. Gergen, K. Action research and orders of democracy. Action Research, 2003, 1 (1). 39 - 56.
56. Gill, J. & Johnson, P. Research methods for managers. London: Paul Chapman, 1997.
57. Glanz, J. Action research: An educational leader's guide to school improvement, 2nd edn. Norwood: Christopher-Gordon, 2003.
58. Glaser, B. & Strauss, B. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.
59. Gold, R.L. Roles in sociological fieldwork. Social Forces, 1958, 36, 217 - 223.
60. Gray, J. Isaiah Berlin. London: HarperCollins, 1995.
61. Greenwood, D. & Levin, M. Introduction to action research. London: Sage, 1998.
62. Greenwood, R. & Hinnings, C. Understanding strategic choice: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 36 (5). 1052 - 1081.
63. Grubbs, B.W. A community of voices: Using allegory as an interpretive device in action research on organizational change. Organizational Research Methods, 2001, 4 (4). 276 - 392.
64. Grundy, S. Curriculum: Product or praxis. Lewes: Falmer Press, 1987.
65. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994, pp. 115 - 117.
66. Gummesson, E. Qualitative methods in management research, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2000.
67. Gustavsen, A. Theory and practice: The mediating discourse. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 17 - 26.
68. Habermas, J. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann, 1972.
69. Habermas, J. Theory and practice. London: Heinemann, 1974.
70. Habermas, J. The theory of communicative action, volume 2; Lifeworlds and system: A critique of functionalist reason. London: Heinemann, 1987.
71. Habermas, J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
72. Hammersley, M. What is wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge, 1992.
73. Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. Ethnography: Principles in practice, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1995.
74. Harrison, R.T. & Leitch, C.M. Learning and organization in the knowledge-based information economy: Initial findings from a participatory action research case study. British Journal of Management, 2000, 11, 103 - 119.
75. Heller, F. Group feedback analysis: A method of field research. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 108 - 117.
76. Heller, F. Action research and research action: A family of methods. In C.M. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage, 2004, pp. 349 - 360.
77. Heron, J. Philosophical basis for a new paradigm. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester: Wiley, 1981.
78. Heron, J. Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage, 1996.
79. Hetrick, W.P. & Boje, D.M. Organization and the body: Post-fordist dimensions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1992, 5 (1). 48 - 57.
80. Humphries, B. From critical though to emancipatory action. In C. Truman, D. Mertens & B. Humphries (Eds), Research and inequality. London: UCL Press, 2000, pp. 179 - 190.
81. Jeffcutt, P. The interpretation of organization: A contemporary analysis and critique. Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31, 225 - 250.
82. Johnson, P. & Duberley, J. Understanding management research: An introduction to epistemology. London: Sage, 2000.
83. Kelly, A. Action research: What is it and what can it do? In R.G. Burgess (Ed.), Issues in qualitative research: Qualitative methods. Lewes: Falmer Press, 1985.
84. Kemmis, S. Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 91 - 102.
85. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. London: Sage, 2000, pp. 567 - 607.
86. Kilduff, M. & Mehra, A. Postmodernism and organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22 (2). 453 - 481.
87. Knights, D. Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17 (3). 514 - 536.
88. Kotter, J.P. Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
89. Kotter, J.P. & Schlesinger, L.A. Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 1979, 57 (2). 106 - 114.
90. Lather, P. Research as praxis. Harvard Business Review, 1986, 56 (3). 257 - 277.
91. Lather, P. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the post-modern. New York: Routledge, 1991.
92. Lecompte, M. & Goetz, J. Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 1982, 52 (1). 31 - 60.
93. Levin, M. & Greenwood, D. Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 103 - 113.
94. Lewin, K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 1946, 2, 34 - 46.
95. Linstead, S. Deconstruction in the study of organizations. In J. Hassard & M. Parker (Eds), Postmodernism and organizations. Sage: London, 1993, pp. 49 - 70.
96. Lynch, K. Equality studies, the academy and the role of research in emancipatory social change. Action Research, 1999, 30 (1). 41 - 69.
97. Lyotard, J.-F. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
98. Marcuse, H. One-dimensional man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1965.
99. Margolis, J. Pragmatism without foundations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
100. Marrow, A.J. The practical theorist: The life and works of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
101. Martin, M. Developing a feminist participative research framework: Evaluating the process. In B. Humphries & C. Truman (Eds), Rethinking social research. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994, pp. 123 - 145.
102. McKernan, J. Curriculum action research. London: Kogan Page, 1996.
103. McPherson, M. & Nunes, M.B. Developing innovation in online learning: An action research framework. London: Routledge Falmer, 2004.
104. Mies, M. Towards a methodology for feminist research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 64 - 82.
105. Miller, E. Dialogue with the client system: Use of the 'working note' in organizational consultancy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1995, 10 (6). 27 - 30.
106. Newton, T. Postmodernism and action. Organization, 1996, 3 (1). 7 - 29.
107. Norris, C. Reclaiming truth: Contribution to a critiques of relativism. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1996.
108. O'Donoghue, T. & Punch, K. Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003.
109. Orpen, C. The effects of job enrichment on employee satisfaction, motivation, involvement and performance: A field experiment. Human Relations, 1979, 32 (3). 189 - 217.
110. Park, P. People, knowledge and change in participatory research. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 141 - 157.
111. Park, P. Knowledge and participatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 81 - 90.
112. Passmore, W. Action research in the workplace: The socio-technical perspective. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2000, pp. 38 - 47.
113. Pedlar, M., Burgoyne, J. & Boydell, T. The learning company: A strategy for sustainable development. London: McGraw Hill, 1991.
114. Perry, C. & Zuber-Skerritt, O. Doctorates by action research for senior practising managers. Management Learning, 1994, 25 (2). 113 - 124.
115. Popper, K. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959.
116. Prasad, A. & Prasad, P. The coming age of interpretive organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2002, 5 (1). 4 - 11.
117. Putnam, R.W. Transforming social practice: An action science perspective. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 177 - 187.
118. Quantz, R.A. On critical ethnography (with some postmodern considerations). In M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Millroy & J. Preissle (Eds), The handbook of qualitative research in education. New York: Academic Press, 1992.
119. Raelin, J. Preface. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 115 - 125.
120. Rapoport, R.N. Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 1970, 23 (6). 499 - 513.
121. Reason, P. Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 207 - 226.
122. Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001.
123. Rosenau, P.M. Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.
124. Ross, R. & Roberts, C. Balancing inquiry and advocacy. In P. Senge et al. (Eds), The fifth discipline fieldbook. London: Nicolas Brealey, 1994, pp. 253 - 259.
125. Sandberg, A. Socio-technical design, trade union strategies and action research. In E. Mumford, R. Hirscheim, G. Fitzgerald & T. Wood-Harper (Eds), Research methods in information systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science, 1985, pp. 79 - 92.
126. Sandford, N. Whatever happened to action research? Journal of Social Issues, 1970, 26, 3 - 23.
127. Sayer, A. Method in social science: A realist approach, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1992.
128. Scase, R. & Goffee, R. Reluctant managers: Their work and life styles. London: Routledge, 1989.
129. Schein, E.H. The clinical perspective in fieldwork. London: Sage, 1987.
130. Schein, E.H. Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: Are they the same? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 1995, 10 (6). 14 - 19.
131. Schein, E.H. Organization learning: What is new? In M.A. Rahim et al. (Eds), Current topics in management: Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1997, pp. 11 - 25.
132. Schein, E.H. Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
133. Schon, D.A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith, 1983.
134. Schwandt, T.A. Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 1996, 2 (1). 58 - 72.
135. Seale, C. The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1999.
136. Senge, P. & Scharmer, O. Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 38 - 47.
137. Stone, E.F. In defence of rigorous research. Contemporary Psychology, 1982, 27, 581 - 595.
138. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage, 1990.
139. Stringer, E. & Genat, W.J. Action research in health. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2004.
140. Susman, G.I. & Evered, R.D. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 582 - 603.
141. Taylor, C. Engaged agency and background. In C.B. Guignin (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
142. Torbert, W.R. Distinctive questions developmental action inquiry tasks. Management Learning, 1999, 30 (2). 189 - 206.
143. Treleaven, L. The turn to action and the linguistic turn: Towards an integrated methodology. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 261 - 272.
144. Trigg, R. Reality at risk: A defence of realism in philosophy and the sciences. Brighton: Harvester, 1980.
145. Tsoukas, H. Postmodernism: Reflexive rationalism and organization studies. Organization Studies, 1992, 14 (3). 323 - 346.
146. Van Maanen, J. An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in ethnography. London: Sage, 1995, pp. 1 - 20.
147. White, A.M. Lewin's action research model as a tool for theory building: A case study from South Africa. Action Research, 2004, 2 (2). 127 - 144.
148. Whyte, W.F. Comparing participative action research and action science. In W.F. Whyte (Ed.), Participative action research. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, 1991.
149. Wilson, H.N. Towards rigour in action research: A case study in marketing planning. European Journal of Marketing, 2004, 38, 378 - 400.