Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-Target visual search

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1398-1408

  Cain, Matthew S ^a   Mitroff, Stephen R ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Satisfaction of search; Visual salience; Visual search; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884915317     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030726     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012, May). Targets need their own personal space. Presented at the Vision Sciences Society Meeting, Naples, FL.
2. Ashman, C. J., Yu, J. S., & Wolfman, D. (2000). Satisfaction of search in osteoradiology. American Journal of Roentgenology, 175, 541-544.
3. Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., & Vomela, M. (2006). Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 235-250. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.235
4. Berbaum, K. S., El-Khoury, G. Y., Ohashi, K., Schartz, K. M., Caldwell, R. T., Madsen, M., & Franklin, E. A., Jr. (2007). Satisfaction of search in multitrauma patients: Severity of detected fractures. Academic Radiology, 14, 711-722. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.016
5. Berbaum, K. S., Franklin, E. A., Jr., Caldwell, R. T., & Schartz, K. M. (2010). Satisfaction of search in traditional radiographic imaging. In E. Samei & E. Krupinski (Eds.), The handbook of medical image perception and techniques (pp. 107-138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biggs, A. T., Cain, M. S., Clark, K., Darling, E. F., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). Professionals and non-professionals in visual search. Manuscript in preparation.
7. Cain, M. S., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012a, May). What eyetracking can tell us about multiple-target visual search. Presented at the Vision Sciences Society Meeting, Naples, FL.
8. Cain, M. S., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012b). Taxonomy of multiple-target search errors. Manuscript in preparation.
9. Cain, M. S., Dunsmoor, J. E., LaBar, K. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual-target search. Psychological Science, 22, 866-871. doi:10.1177/0956797611412393
10. Cain, M. S., Vul, E., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science, 23, 1047-1054. doi:10.1177/0956797612440460
11. Chan, H. S., & Courtney, A. J. (1995). Visual performance on detection tasks with two targets. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5, 417-428. doi:10.1002/hfm.4530050405
12. Chan, A. H. S., Courtney, A. J., & Ma, C. W. (2002). Visual performance on detection tasks with double-targets of the same and different difficulty. Ergonomics, 45, 934-948. doi:10.1080/00140130210166087
13. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39-78. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0002
14. Clark, K., Cain, M. S., Adcock, R. A., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012a, May). Interactions between reward, feedback, and timing structures on dualtarget search performance. Presented at the Vision Sciences Society Meeting, Naples, FL.
15. Clark, K., Cain, M. S., Adcock, R. A., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012b). Motivational influences on satisfaction of search errors in multiple-target visual search. Manuscript in preparation.
16. Clark, K., Samei, E., Baker, J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011, November). Expertise in radiological screening and satisfaction of search. Presented at the Object Perception, Attention, and Memory Meeting, Seattle, WA.
17. Clark, K., Samei, E., Baker, J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). Expertise in radiological screening and satisfaction of search. Manuscript in preparation.
18. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 958-975. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.958
19. Dickinson, C. A., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2005). Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1120-1126. doi:10.3758/BF03206453
20. Dickinson, C. A., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2007). Memory for the search path: Evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Vision Research, 47, 1745-1755. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.010
21. Dowd, E. W., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search. Manuscript in preparation.
22. Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11, 14-36. doi:10.1167/11.5.14
23. Emrich, S. M., Al-Aidroos, N., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2009). Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 4, e8042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008042
24. Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18, 943-947. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x
25. Fleck, M. S., Samei, E., & Mitroff, S. R. (2010). Generalized "satisfaction of search": Adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 60-71. doi:10.1037/a0018629
26. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 761-768. doi:10.3758/BF03196215
27. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577. doi:10.1038/29068
28. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285. doi:10.3758/BF03194468
29. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10, 257-298. doi:10.1080/13506280143000005
30. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
31. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2008). Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Research, 72, 99-105. doi:10.1007/s00426-006-0075-1
32. Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). It's under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 132-138. doi:10.3758/BF03193824
33. McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., Boot, W. R., Peterson, M. S., Wang, R. F., & Irwin, D. E. (2006). Oculomotor behaviour in visual search for multiple targets. Visual Cognition, 14, 685-703. doi:10.1080/13506280500194147
34. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Peterson, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01457
35. Menneer, T., Barrett, D. J. K., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., & Cave, K. R. (2007). Costs in searching for two targets: Dividing search across target types could improve airport security screening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 915-932. doi:10.1002/acp.1305
36. Mitroff, S. R., Scholl, B. J., & Wynn, K. (2004). Divide and conquer how object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15, 420-425. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00695.x
37. Moher, J., & Egeth, H. E. (2012). The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0
38. Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T., & Enns, J. T. (2007). The path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating. Vision Research, 47, 1624-1630. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.030
39. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61-64.
40. Nakayama, K., & Martini, P. (2011). Situating visual search. Vision Research, 51, 1526-1537. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.003
41. Noles, N., Scholl, B. J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2005). The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 324-334. doi: 10.3758/BF03206495
42. Oh, S.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275-281. doi:10.3758/BF03196570
43. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243-1265. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
44. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E., & McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00353
45. Rich, A. N., Kunar, M. A., Van Wert, M. J., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect. Journal of Vision, 8(15), 1-17. doi:10.1167/8.15.1
46. Scholl, B. J., & Feigenson, L. (2004). When out of sight is out of mind: Perceiving object persistence through occlusion vs. implosion. Journal of Vision, 4. doi:10.1167/4.8.26
47. Smith, M. J. (1967). Error and variation in diagnostic radiology. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
48. Solman, G. J. F., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2011). Memory load affects visual search processes without influencing search efficiency. Vision Research, 51, 1185-1191. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.009
49. Takeda, Y. (2004). Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memorybased control of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 71-76. doi:10.3758/BF03206463
50. Theeuwes, J., & Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1342-1353. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1342
51. Tuddenham, W. J. (1962). Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis. Studies of the psycho-physiology of roentgen image perception. Radiology, 78, 694-704. doi:10.1148/78.5.694
52. Vickery, T. J., King, L.-W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81-92. doi:10.1167/5.1.8
53. Williams, C. C., Henderson, J. M., & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 816-827.
54. Wojciulik, E., Rorden, C., Clarke, K., Husain, M., & Driver, J. (2004). Group study of an "undercover" test for visuospatial neglect: Invisible cancellation can reveal more neglect than standard cancellation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, 1356-1358. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.021931
55. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99-119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56. Wong, J. H., & Peterson, M. S. (2011). The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1768-1779. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0136-4
57. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274. doi:10.3758/BF03196569