The persistence of object file representations

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 324-334

  Noles, Nicholaus S ^a   Scholl, Brian J ^a   Mitroff, Stephen R ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244494876     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206495     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. BAILLARGEON, R. (2002). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy: A summary in eight lessons. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of child cognitive development (pp. 47-83). Oxford: Blackwell.
2. BERTENTHAL, B. I., BANTON, T., & BRADBURY, A. (1993). Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception, 22, 193-207.
3. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. CAREY, S., & XU, F. (2001). Infant knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179-213.
5. CHIANG, W.-C., & WYNN, K. (2000). Infants' representation and tracking of multiple objects. Cognition, 77, 169-195.
6. COMTOIS, R. (2003). Vision Shell PPC [Software]. Watertown, MA: Author.
7. DRIVER, J., DAVIS, G., RUSSELL, C., TURATTO, M., & FREEMAN, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention, and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
8. FEIGENSON, L., CAREY, S., & HAUSER, M. (2002). The representations underlying infants' choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150-156.
9. FEIGENSON, L., & HALBERDA, J. (2004). Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals. Cognition, 91, 173-190.
10. GORDON, R. D., & IRWIN, D. E. (1996). What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
11. GORDON, R. D., & IRWIN, D. E. (2000). The role of physical and conceptual properties in preserving object continuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 136-150.
12. HENDERSON, J. M. (1994), Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
13. HENDERSON, J. M., & ANES, M. D. (1994). Roles of object file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 826-839.
14. HUFFMAN, D. D., & RICHARDS, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
15. KAHNEMAN, D., & TREISMAN, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
17. KRUSCHKE, J. K., & FRAGASSI, M. M. (1996). The perception of causality: Feature binding in interacting objects. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 441-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. LESLIE, A. M., XU, F., TREMOULET, P., & SCHOLL, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing "what" and "where" systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10-18.
19. MITROFF, S. R., SCHOLL, B. J., & WYNN, K. (2004). Divide and conquer: How object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15, 420-425.
20. MITROFF, S. R., SCHOLL, B. J., & WYNN, K. (2005). The relationship between object files and conscious perception. Cognition, 96, 67-92.
21. NAKAYAMA, K., HE, Z. J., & SHIMOJO, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In D. N. Osherson (Series Ed.) & S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Vol. Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 2. Visual cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. POLLATSEK, A., RAYNER, K., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1990). The role of spatial location in the integration of information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 199-210.
23. RAUSCHENBERGER, R., & YANTIS, S. (2001). Masking unveils preamodal completion representation in visual search. Nature, 410, 369-372.
24. SCHOLL, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
25. SCHOLL, B. J., & LESLIE, A. M. (1999). Explaining the infant's object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In E. Lepore & Z. Pylyshyn (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26-73). Oxford: Blackwell.
26. SCHOLL, B. J., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
27. SEKULER, A., & SEKULER, R. (1999). Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Perception, 28, 415-432.
28. SPELKE, E. S., PHILLIPS, A., & WOODWARD, A. L. (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber & D. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
29. TARR, M., WILLIAMS, P., HAYWARD, W., & GAUTHIER, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
30. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
31. VANMARLE, K., & SCHOLL, B. J. (2003). Attentive tracking of objects versus substances. Psychological Science, 14, 498-504.
32. WATANABE, K., & SHIMOJO, S. (1998). Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception, 27, 1041-1054.
33. WYNN, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749-750.
34. WYNN, K. (1998). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296-303.
35. XU, F., & CAREY, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153.
36. ZACKS, J., & TVERSKY, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.