Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 71-76

  Takeda, Yuji ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442594981     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206463     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
2. HAN, S.-H., & KIM, M.-S. (2002, July). Visual search does not remain efficient when working memory is working. Paper presented at the Second Asian Conference on Vision, Gyeongju, Korea.
3. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
4. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285.
5. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10, 257-298.
6. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
7. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
8. KRISTJÁNSSON, Á. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
9. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-291.
10. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MÜHLENEN, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
11. OGAWA, H., TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2002). Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science, 13, 125-129.
12. OH, S.-H., & KIM, M.-S. (2002, July). Visual search efficiency is affected by spatial working memory. Paper presented at the Second Asian Conference on Vision, Gyeongju, Korea.
13. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
14. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
15. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
16. TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
17. TUHOLSKI, S. W., ENGLE, R. W., & BAYLIS, G. C. (2001). Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition, 29, 484-492.
18. WOODMAN, G. F., VOGEL, E. K., & LUCK, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.