Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 15, 2008, Pages

  Rich, Anina N ^a,b,c   Kunar, Melina A ^d   Van Wert, Michael J ^b   Hidalgo Sotelo, Barbara ^e   Horowitz, Todd S ^b,c   Wolfe, Jeremy M ^b,c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^e MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Conjunction search; Eye movements; Feature search; Search; Target prevalence

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 56749107401     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.15.15     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Araujo, C., Kowler, E., & Pavel, M. (2001). Eye movements during visual search: The costs of choosing the optimal path. Vision Research, 41, 3613-3625.
2. Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1966). Choice reaction time as a function of stimulus versus response relative frequency of occurrence. Nature, 212, 1069-1070.
3. Bond, A. B., & Kamil, A. C. (2002). Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature, 415, 609-613.
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
5. Carrasco, M., & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5363-5367.
6. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39-78.
7. Colquhoun, W. P., & Baddeley, A. D, (1967). Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 153-155.
8. Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E. A., D'Orsi, C., et al. (2007). Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 1399-1409.
9. Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18, 943-947.
10. Gur, D., Sumkin, J. H., Rockette, H. E., Gannot, M., Hakim, C., Hardesty, L., et al. (2004). Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 185-190.
11. Healy, A. F., & Kubovy, M. (1981). Probability matching and the formation of conservative decision rules in a numerical analog of signal detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 344-354.
12. Hoffman, J. E. (1996). Visual attention and eye movements. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention. London: University College London Press.
13. Hogg, R. V., & Craig, A. T. (1995). Introduction to mathematical statistics (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Hong, S.-K. (2005). Human stopping strategies in multiple-target search. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 1-12.
15. Hooge, I. T., & Erkelens, C. J. (1998). Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1295-1302.
16. Krinchik, E. (1974). Probability effects in choice reaction time tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 131-144.
17. Li, H., Li, F., Gao, H. H., Chen, A., & Lin, C. (2006). Appropriate responding can reduce miss errors in visual search. Unpublished manuscript.
18. Maddox, W. T. (2002). Toward a unified theory of decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 567-595.
19. McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1517-1539.
20. Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus-response probability on choice reaction time: Evidence from the laterlized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1521-1534.
21. Moore, T., & Fallah, M. (2004). Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 152-162.
22. Motter, B. C., & Belky, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1805-1815.
23. Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). Optimality of visual search behavior. Paper presented at the Joint Symposium of Neural Computation.
24. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
25. Rubenstein, J. (Ed.) (2001). Test and evaluation plan: X-ray image screener selection test. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Research.
26. Shen, J., & Reingold, E. M. (1999). Saccadic selectivity during visual search: The effects of shape and stimulus familiarity. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Smith, P. A., & Turnbull, L. S. (1997). Small cell and 'pale' dyskaryosis. Cytopathology, 8, 3-8.
28. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
29. Van Wert, M. J., Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (in press). Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Perception & Psychophysics.
30. Wolfe, J. M., & DiMase, J. S. (2003). Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search? Perception, 32, 645-656.
31. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., & Kenner, N. M. (2005). Cognitive psychology: Rare items often missed in visual searches. Nature, 435, 439-440.
32. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Van Wert, M. J., Kenner, N. M., Place, S. S., & Kibbi, N. (2007). Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 623-638.
33. Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R. P. N., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.
34. Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36, 2177-2187.
35. Zelinsky, G. J., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 244-262.
36. Zenger, B., & Fahle, A (1997). Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: A model for error rates in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1783-1791.