Oculomotor behaviour in visual search for multiple targets

Visual Cognition

Volumn 14, Issue 4-8, 2006, Pages 685-703

  McCarley, Jason S ^a   Kramer, Arthur F ^a   Boot, Walter R ^a   Peterson, Matthew S ^b   Wang, Ranxiao F ^a   Irwin, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SAMPLING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 33745823923     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280500194147     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baddeley, A. D.(1986) Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bertera, J. H. and Rayner, K. (2000) Eye movements and the span of the effective visual stimulus in visual search Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 576-585.
3. Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S.(2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 854-861.
4. Chelazzi, L. (1999) Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A critical look at the evidence Psychological Research, 62, pp. 195-219.
5. Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. (1989) Visual search and stimulus similarity Psychological Review, 96, pp. 433-458.
6. Gilchrist, I. D. and Harvey, M. (2000) Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search Current Biology, 10, pp. 1209-1212.
7. Han, S. H. and Kim, M. S. (2004) Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working Psychological Science, 15, pp. 623-628.
8. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (1998) Visual search has no memory Nature, 394, pp. 575-577.
9. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (2001) Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search Perception and Psychophysics, 63, pp. 272-285.
10. Horowitz, T. S. and Wolfe, J. M. (2003) Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10, pp. 257- 298.
11. Itti, L. and Koch, C. (2000) A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention Vision Research, 40, pp. 1489-1506.
12. Jensen, E. and Reese, E. and Reese, T. (1950) The subitizing and counting of visually presented fields of dots Journal of Psychology, 30, pp. 363-392.
13. Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S.(1977) Urn models and their applications. New York: Wiley.
14. Klein, R. M. (1988) Inhibitory tagging facilitates visual search Nature, 334, pp. 430-431.
15. Klein, R. M.(2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science, 138-147.
16. Klein, R. M. and MacInnes, W. J. (1999) Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search Psychological Science, 10, pp. 346-352.
17. Kristjánsson, Á. (2000) In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search Psychological Science, 11, pp. 328-332.
18. MacInnes, W. J. and Klein, R. M. (2003) Inhibition of return biases orienting during the search of complex scenes The Scientific World, 3, pp. 75-86.
19. McCarley, J. S. and Wang, R. F. and Kramer, A. F. and Irwin, D. E. and Peterson, M. S. (2003) How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, pp. 422-426.
20. Müller, H. J. and von Mühlenen, A. (2000) Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1591-1605.
21. Oh, S. H. and Kim, M. S. (2004) The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 275-281.
22. Paul, M. A. and Tipper, S. P. (2003) Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes Experimental Brain Research, 148, pp. 283-289.
23. Peterson, M. S. and Kramer, A. F. and Wang, R. F. and Irwin, D. E. and McCarley, J. S. (2001) Visual search has memory Psychological Science, 12, pp. 287-292.
24. Pomplun, M. and Reingold, E. M. and Shen, J. (2001) Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention Cognition, 81, pp. B57-B67.
25. Posner, M. I. (1980) Orienting of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, pp. 3-25.
26. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y.(1984) Components of visual orienting. In Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. (pp. 531-556). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
27. Rafal, R. D. and Calabresi, P. A. and Brennan, C. W. and Sciolto, T. K. (1989) Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp. 673-685.
28. Rayner, K. (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 372-422.
29. Rayner, K. and Fisher, D. L.(1987) Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. In Eye movements: From physiology to cognition. (pp. 293-302). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Sapir, A. and Soroker, N. and Berger, A. and Henik, A. (1999) Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation Nature Neuroscience, 2, pp. 1053-1054.
31. Shore, D. I. and Klein, R. M. (2000) On the manifestations of memory in visual search Spatial Vision, 14, pp. 59-75.
32. Takeda, Y. (2004) Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 71-76.
33. Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2000) Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 927-934.
34. Tipper, S. P. and Weaver, B. and Watson, F. L. (1996) Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp. 1289-1293.
35. Treisman, A. and Sato, S. (1990) Conjunction search revisited Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, pp. 459-478.
36. Trick, L. M. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision Psychological Review, 101, pp. 80-102.
37. Von Mühlenen, A. and Müller, H. J. and Müller, D. (2003) Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search Psychological Science, 14, pp. 309-314.
38. Wolfe, J. M. (1994) Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, pp. 202-238.
39. Wolfe, J. M. and Alvarez, G. A. and Horowitz, T. S. (2000) Attention is fast but volition is slow Nature, 406, pp. 691.
40. Wolfe, J. M. and Cave, K. R. and Franzel, S. L. (1989) Guided Search: An alternative to feature integration model for visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, pp. 419-433.
41. Woodman, G. F. and Luck, S. J. (2004) Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp.269-274.
42. Zelinsky, G. J. and Sheinberg, D. L. (1997) Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, pp. 244-262.