SUMO functions in constitutive transcription and during activation of inducible genes in yeast

Genes and Development

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1242-1252

  Rosonina, Emanuel ^a   Duncan, Sarah M ^a   Manley, James L ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Activation; Deactivation; Smt3; SUMO; Sumoylation; Transcription

Indexed keywords

CELL EXTRACT; GALACTOSE; PROTEIN UBC9; RNA POLYMERASE II; SUMO PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMOSOME 5; CHROMOSOME 7; ENZYME INACTIVATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL GENE SILENCING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SUMOYLATION; WESTERN BLOTTING; YEAST;

ARGINASE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES;

EID: 77953929082     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1917910     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Auld KL, Brown CR, Casolari JM, Komili S, Silver PA. 2006. Genomic association of the proteasome demonstrates over-lapping gene regulatory activity with transcription factor substrates. Mol Cell 21: 861-871.
2. Betting J, Seufert W. 1996. A yeast Ubc9 mutant protein with temperature-sensitive in vivo function is subject to conditional proteolysis by a ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 271: 25790-25796.
3. Bhaumik SR, Malik S. 2008. Diverse regulatory mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation by the proteasome complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 43: 419-433.
4. Boyer-Guittaut M, Birsoy K, Potel C, Elliott G, Jaffray E, Desterro JM, Hay RT, Oelgeschlager T. 2005. SUMO-1 modification of human transcription factor (TF) IID complex subunits: Inhibition of TFIID promoter-binding activity through SUMO-1 modification of hsTAF5. J Biol Chem 280: 9937-9945.
5. Chen X, Ding B, LeJeune D, Ruggiero C, Li S. 2009. Rpb1 sumoylation in response to UV radiation or transcriptional impairment in yeast. PLoS One 4: e5267. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0005267.
6. Chi Y, Huddleston MJ, Zhang X, Young RA, Annan RS, Carr SA, Deshaies RJ. 2001. Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. Genes Dev 15: 1078-1092.
7. Chupreta S, Holmstrom S, Subramanian L, Iniguez-Lluhi JA. 2005. A small conserved surface in SUMO is the critical structural determinant of its transcriptional inhibitory properties. Mol Cell Biol 25: 4272-4282.
8. Crabeel M, Lavalle R, Glansdorff N. 1990. Arginine-specific repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetic data on ARG1 and ARG3 mRNA transcription and stability support a transcriptional control mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 10: 1226-1233. (Pubitemid 20082949)
9. Denison C, Rudner AD, Gerber SA, Bakalarski CE, Moazed D, Gygi SP. 2005. A proteomic strategy for gaining insights into protein sumoylation in yeast. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 246-254.
10. Falco SC, Dumas KS. 1985. Genetic analysis of mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to the herbicide sulfo-meturon methyl. Genetics 109: 21-35.
11. Garcia-Dominguez M, Reyes JC. 2009. SUMO association with repressor complexes, emerging routes for transcriptional control. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789: 451-459.
12. Geisberg JV, Holstege FC, Young RA, Struhl K. 2001. Yeast NC2 associates with the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex and selectively affects transcription in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2736-2742.
13. Geisberg JV, Moqtaderi Z, Kuras L, Struhl K. 2002. Mot1 associates with transcriptionally active promoters and inhibits association of NC2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22: 8122-8134.
14. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F. 2007. Concepts in sumoylation: A decade on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 947-956.
15. Gill G. 2005. Something about SUMO inhibits transcription. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 536-541.
16. Girdwood D, Bumpass D, Vaughan OA, Thain A, Anderson LA, Snowden AW, Garcia-Wilson E, Perkins ND, Hay RT. 2003. P300 transcriptional repression is mediated by SUMO modification. Mol Cell 11: 1043-1054.
17. Girdwood DW, Tatham MH, Hay RT. 2004. SUMO and transcriptional regulation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 15: 201-210.
18. Govind CK, Yoon S, Qiu H, Govind S, Hinnebusch AG. 2005. Simultaneous recruitment of coactivators by Gcn4p stimulates multiple steps of transcription in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 25: 5626-5638.
19. Guo B, Sharrocks AD. 2009. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling initiates a dynamic interplay between sumoylation and ubiquitination to regulate the activity of the transcriptional activator PEA3. Mol Cell Biol 29: 3204-3218.
20. Hannich JT, Lewis A, Kroetz MB, Li SJ, Heide H, Emili A, Hochstrasser M. 2005. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 4102-4110.
21. Holmstrom S, Van Antwerp ME, Iniguez-Lluhi JA. 2003. Direct and distinguishable inhibitory roles for SUMO isoforms in the control of transcriptional synergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 15758-15763.
22. Johnson ES. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 355-382.
23. Kim J, Cantwell CA, Johnson PF, Pfarr CM, Williams SC. 2002. Transcriptional activity of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins is controlled by a conserved inhibitory domain that is a target for sumoylation. J Biol Chem 277: 38037-38044.
24. Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, Zachariae W, Winsor B, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: More tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963-972. (Pubitemid 29373791)
25. Komarnitsky P, Cho EJ, Buratowski S. 2000. Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription. Genes Dev 14: 2452-2460.
26. Kornitzer D, Raboy B, Kulka RG, Fink GR. 1994. Regulated degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4. EMBO J 13: 6021-6030.
27. Lyst MJ, Stancheva I. 2007. A role for SUMO modification in transcriptional repression and activation. Biochem Soc Trans 35: 1389-1392.
28. Makhnevych T, Sydorskyy Y, Xin X, Srikumar T, Vizeacoumar FJ, Jeram SM, Li Z, Bahr S, Andrews BJ, Boone C, et al. 2009. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol Cell 33: 124-135.
29. Martin N, Schwamborn K, Schreiber V, Werner A, Guillier C, Zhang XD, Bischof O, Seeler JS, Dejean A. 2009. PARP-1 transcriptional activity is regulated by sumoylation upon heat shock. EMBO J 28: 3534-3548.
30. Montpetit B, Hazbun TR, Fields S, Hieter P. 2006. Sumoylation of the budding yeast kinetochore protein Ndc10 is required for Ndc10 spindle localization and regulation of anaphase spindle elongation. J Cell Biol 174: 653-663.
31. Muller S, Berger M, Lehembre F, Seeler JS, Haupt Y, Dejean A. 2000. c-Jun and p53 activity is modulated by SUMO-1 modification. J Biol Chem 275: 13321-13329.
32. Nathan D, Ingvarsdottir K, Sterner DE, Bylebyl GR, Dokmanovic M, Dorsey JA, Whelan KA, Krsmanovic M, Lane WS, Meluh PB, et al. 2006. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev 20: 966-976.
33. Onishi A, Peng GH, Hsu C, Alexis U, Chen S, Blackshaw S. 2009. Pias3-dependent SUMOylation directs rod photoreceptor development. Neuron 61: 234-246.
34. Ouyang J, Gill G. 2009. SUMO engages multiple corepressors to regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Epigenetics 4: 440-444.
35. Panse VG, Hardeland U, Werner T, Kuster B, Hurt E. 2004. A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J Biol Chem 279: 41346-41351.
36. Pichler A, Melchior F. 2002. Ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO1 and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Traffic 3: 381-387.
37. Qiu H, Hu C, Yoon S, Natarajan K, Swanson MJ, Hinnebusch AG. 2004. An array of coactivators is required for optimal recruitment of TATA binding protein and RNA polymerase II by promoter-bound Gcn4p. Mol Cell Biol 24: 4104-4117.
38. Qiu H, Hu C, Zhang F, Hwang GJ, Swanson MJ, Boonchird C, Hinnebusch AG. 2005. Interdependent recruitment of SAGA and Srb mediator by transcriptional activator Gcn4p. Mol Cell Biol 25: 3461-3474.
39. Rep M, Krantz M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S. 2000. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathwaydependent genes. J Biol Chem 275: 8290-8300.
40. Rosas-Acosta G, Russell WK, Deyrieux A, Russell DH, Wilson VG. 2005. A universal strategy for proteomic studies of SUMO and other ubiquitin-like modifiers. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 56-72.
41. Rosonina E, Willis IM, Manley JL. 2009. Sub1 functions in osmoregulation and in transcription by both RNA polymerases II and III. Mol Cell Biol 29: 2308-2321.
42. Seufert W, Futcher B, Jentsch S. 1995. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature 373: 78-81.
43. Shiio Y, Eisenman RN. 2003. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 13225-13230.
44. Sikder D, Johnston SA, Kodadek T. 2006. Widespread, but non-identical, association of proteasomal 19 and 20 S proteins with yeast chromatin. J Biol Chem 281: 27346-27355.
45. Tansey WP. 2001. Transcriptional activation: Risky business. Genes Dev 15: 1045-1050.
46. van Werven FJ, van Bakel H, van Teeffelen HA, Altelaar AF, Koerkamp MG, Heck AJ, Holstege FC, Timmers HT. 2008. Cooperative action of NC2 and Mot1p to regulate TATA-binding protein function across the genome. Genes Dev 22: 2359-2369.
47. Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley JL. 2007. Sumoylation modulates the assembly and activity of the pre-mRNA 39′ processing complex. Mol Cell Biol 27: 8848-8858.
48. Wang Z, Prelich G. 2009. Quality control of a transcriptional regulator by SUMO-targeted degradation. Mol Cell Biol 29: 1694-1706.
49. Wohlschlegel JA, Johnson ES, Reed SI, Yates JR 3rd. 2004. Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 45662-45668.
50. Wykoff DD, O'Shea EK. 2005. Identification of sumoylated proteins by systematic immunoprecipitation of the budding yeast proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 73-83.
51. Yang SH, Jaffray E, Hay RT, Sharrocks AD. 2003. Dynamic interplay of the SUMO and ERK pathways in regulating Elk-1 transcriptional activity. Mol Cell 12: 63-74.
52. Yudkovsky N, Ranish JA, Hahn S. 2000. A transcription reinitiation intermediate that is stabilized by activator. Nature 408: 225-229.
53. Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. 2004. Changes in genomewide occupancy of core transcriptional regulators during heat stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 16843-16848.
54. Zhao J. 2007. Sumoylation regulates diverse biological processes. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 3017-3033.
55. Zhao Y, Kwon SW, Anselmo A, Kaur K, White MA. 2004. Broad spectrum identification of cellular small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrate proteins. J Biol Chem 279: 20999-21002.
56. Zhou W, Ryan JJ, Zhou H. 2004. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J Biol Chem 279: 32262-32268.