Regular three-dimensional presentations improve in the identification of surgical liver anatomy - A randomized study

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Müller Stich, Beat P ^a   Löb, Nicole ^a   Wald, Diana ^b   Bruckner, Thomas ^c   Meinzer, Hans Peter ^b   Kadmon, Martina ^a   Büchler, Markus W ^a   Fischer, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^c Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIVER; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

ANATOMY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER; MALE;

EID: 84884517406     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-131     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 3D: a tool for medication discharge education. Manning DM, O'Meara JG, Williams AR, et al. Qual Saf Health Care 2007 16 71 76 10.1136/qshc.2006.018564 17301210 (Pubitemid 46347954)
2. Teaching on three-dimensional presentation does not improve the understanding of according CT images: a randomized controlled study. Metzler R, Stein D, Tetzlaff R, et al. Teach Learn Med 2012 24 140 148 10.1080/10401334. 2012.664963 22490095
3. Three-dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy. Beermann J, Tetzlaff R, Bruckner T, et al. Med Educ 2010 44 936 940 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03742.x 20716104
4. Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery. Blavier A, Nyssen AS, Ergonomics 2009 52 1342 1349 10.1080/00140130903137277 19851902
5. Inclusion of 3-D computed tomography rendering and immersive VR in a third year medical student surgery curriculum. Mastrangelo MJ Jr, Adrales G, McKinlay R, et al. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003 94 199 203 15455893
6. Comparison of traditional methods with 3D computer models in the instruction of hepatobiliary anatomy. Keedy AW, Durack JC, Sandhu P, Chen EM, O'Sullivan PS, Breiman RS, Anat Sci Educ 2011 4 84 91 10.1002/ase.212 21412990
7. A novel three-dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy. Estevez ME, Lindgren KA, Bergethon PR, Anat Sci Educ 2010 3 309 317 10.1002/ase.186 20939033
8. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L, Lancet 2001 357 363 364 11211004 (Pubitemid 32128548)
9. Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Jansen-Osmann P, Heil M, Brain Cogn 2007 64 217 227 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.002 17433514 (Pubitemid 47002108)
10. Does preoperative analysis of intrahepatic venous anastomoses improve the surgeon's intraoperative decision making?Pilot data from a case report. Fischer L, Schoebinger M, Neumann JO, et al. Patient Saf Surg 2008 2 19 10.1186/1754-9493-2-19 18718022
11. Interactive segmentation framework of the medical imaging interaction toolkit. Maleike D, Nolden M, Meinzer HP, Wolf I, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009 96 72 83 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.04.004 19439392
12. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, et al. Arch Surg 2000 135 1256 1261 10.1001/archsurg.135.11.1256 11074877
13. Limits of Couinaud's liver segment classification: a quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. Fischer L, Cardenas C, Thorn M, et al. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002 26 962 967 10.1097/00004728-200211000-00019 12488744 (Pubitemid 36076715)
14. The segments of the hepatic veins-is there a spatial correlation to the couinaud liver segments? Fischer L, Thorn M, Neumann JO, et al. Eur J Radiol 2005 53 245 255 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.02.003 15664288 (Pubitemid 40143586)
15. How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization? Fischer L, Tetzlaff R, Schobinger M, et al. Eur J Radiol 2010 74 144 e148 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.033 19559549
16. The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I, et al. Med Image Anal 2005 9 594 604 10.1016/j.media.2005.04.005 15896995 (Pubitemid 41488119)
17. The extensible open-source rigid and affine image registration module of the medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK). Stein D, Fritzsche KH, Nolden M, Meinzer HP, Wolf I, Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010 100 79 86 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.02.008 20409608
18. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS, Acta Chir Belg 2006 106 662 664 17290690
19. Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: a randomised study. Prinz A, Bolz M, Findl O, Br J Ophthalmol 2005 89 1495 1499 10.1136/bjo.2005.075077 16234460 (Pubitemid 41527389)
20. 3-Dimensional computer animation-a new medium for supporting patient education before surgery. Acceptance and assessment of patients based on a prospective randomized study-picture versus text. Hermann M, Chirurg 2002 73 500 507 10.1007/s00104-001-0416-y 12089836