Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: A randomised study

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1495-1499

  Prinz, A ^a   Bolz, M ^a   Findl, Oliver ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EYE SURGERY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEACHING; TECHNICAL AID; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEORECORDING;

CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MULTIMEDIA; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SEX FACTORS; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 27344460913     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075077     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mehrabi A, Gluckstein C, Benner A, et al. A new way for surgical education-development and evaluation of a computer-based training module. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2000;30:97-109.
2. Giezendanner FD. Nouvelles technologies E'ducatives multimedia au service de nouvelles strategies pedagogiques. Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift 1990;120:1843-57.
3. Glittenberg CG, Binder S. Computer-assisted 3D design software for teaching neuro-ophthalmology of the oculomotor system and training new retinal surgery techniques. Proc SPIE 2004;5314:275-85.
4. Sandroni C, Bocci M, Damiani F, et al. O-2 Multimedia teaching of BLS in medical students. Resuscitation 1996;31:S2.
5. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 2001;357:363-4.
6. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, et al. Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet 2002;359:230-1.
7. Sidhu RS, Tompa D, Jang R, et al. Interpretation of three-dimensional structure from two-dimensional endovascular images: implications for educators in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1305-11.
8. Epting LK, Overman WH. Sex-sensitive tasks in men and women: a search for performance fluctuations across the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience 1998;112:1304-17.
9. Phillips K, Silverman I. Differences in the relationship of menstrual cycle phase to spatial performance on two- and three-dimensional tasks. Hormones and Behaviour 1997;32:167-75.
10. Roberts JE, Bell MA. Two- and three-dimensional mental rotation tasks lead to different parietal laterality for men and women. Int J Psychophysiol 2003;50:235-46.
11. Bibawi D, Cherry B, Hellige J. Fluctuations of perceptual asymmetry across time in women and men: effects related to the menstrual cycle. Neuropsycologia 1995;33:131-8.
12. Jones CM, Braithwaite VA, Healy SD. The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behav Neurosci 2003;117:403-11.
13. Ecuyer-Dab I, Robert M. Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition 2004;91:221-57.
14. Jacobs LF, Gaulin SJC, Sherry DF, et al. Evolution of spatial cognition: sex-specific patterns of spatial behavior predict hippocampal size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6349-52.
15. Eals M, Silverman I. The hunter gather theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethnology and Sociobiology 1994;15:95-105.
16. Geary DC. Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition. Learning and Individual Differences 1995;7:289-301.
17. McCormick CM, Teillon SM. Menstrual cycle variation in spatial ability: relation to salivary cortisol levels. Hormones and Behavior 2001;39:29-38.
18. Linn MC, Petersen AC. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 1985;56:1479-98.
19. Huk T, Steinke M, Floto C. The influence of visual spatial ability on the attitude of users towards high-quality 3D-animations in hypermedia learning environments. Word Conference on E-Learning in Corp, Govt, Health, and Higher Ed 2003:1038-41.
20. Mayer RE. The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction 2003;13:125-39.