The extensible open-source rigid and affine image registration module of the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK)

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 79-86

  Stein, D ^a   Fritzsche, K H ^a   Nolden, M ^a   Meinzer, H P ^a   Wolf, I ^a,b  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b MANNHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Application; Framework; Image alignment; Image matching; Image registration

Indexed keywords

3D REGISTRATION; AFFINE REGISTRATION; END-USERS; FRAMEWORK; IMAGE ALIGNMENT; IMAGE MASKS; MEDICAL IMAGES; MEDICAL IMAGING INTERACTION TOOLKIT; METRIC VALUES; NON-RIGID; NONRIGID REGISTRATION METHOD; OPEN-SOURCE; OPTIMIZERS; SPECIFIC PROBLEMS;

ALIGNMENT; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE MATCHING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METRIC SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ULTRASOUND;

COMPUTERS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77956012702     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Maurer C.R., Fitzpatrick J.M. A review of medical image registration. Interactive Imageguided Neurosurgery 1993, pp. 17-44.
2. Maintz J., Viergever M. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998, 2(1):1-36.
3. Pluim J.P.W., Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 22(8):986-1004.
4. Zitova B. Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003, 21(11):977-1000.
5. D. L.G. Hill, B.P., Registration methodology: Concepts and algorithms, Medical Image Registration (2000) 40-70.
6. Brown L.G. A survey of image registration techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 1992, 24:325-376.
7. L. Ibanez, W. Schroeder, K. Ng, The ITK Software Guide, 2005.
8. http://www.itk.org.
9. Pieper S., Halle M., Kikinis R. 3D slicer. Proceedings of ISBI'04 2004.
10. http://www.slicer.org.
11. http://elastix.isi.uu.nl.
12. Dickhaus H., Floca R., Eisenmann U., Metzner R., Wirtz C.R. A flexible registration framework for multimodal image data. Proceedings of the EMBC 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2004, pp. 1755-1758.
13. Floca R., Dickhaus H. A Flexible Registration and Evaluation Engine (f.r.e.e.). Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2007, 87:81-92.
14. http://www.floca.de/research/free/index.php.
15. http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/research/flirt/.
16. Jenkinson M., Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis 2001, 5(2):143-156.
17. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002, 17(2):825-841.
18. http://bishopw.loni.ucla.edu/air5/.
19. Woods R.P., Grafton S.T., Holmes C.J., Cherry S.R., Mazziotta J.C. Automated image registration. I. General methods and intrasubject, intra-modality validation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998, 22:141-154.
20. Woods R.P., Grafton S.T., Watson J.D.G., Sicotte N.L., Mazziotta J.C. Automated image registration. II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998, 22(1):153-165.
21. T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, F. Yergeau, Extensible Markup Language (xml) 1.0, fifth ed., W3C(2008).
22. http://docs.mitk.org/nightly-qt4/classmitk_1_1geometry3d.html.
23. http://www.mitk.org.
24. http://www.vtk.org.
25. W. Schroeder, K. Martin, B. Lorensen, Visualization Toolkit, third ed., Kitware Inc, January 2004.