A novel three-dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomy

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 309-317

  Estevez, Maureen E ^a,b   Lindgren, Kristen A ^a   Bergethon, Peter R ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomical sciences; Anatomy teaching; Gross anatomy; Medical education; Neuroscience neuroanatomy teaching; Neurosciences; Three dimensional visualization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; METHODOLOGY; NEUROANATOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEUROANATOMY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 78649549037     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.186     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2008. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ 1: 184-188.
2. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. 2006. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med 355: 1339-1344.
3. Cottam WW. 1999. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat 12: 55-65.
4. Dalgarno B, Harper B. 2003. 3D Environments for spatial learning: The importance of learning task design. In: Crisp G, Thiele D, Scholten I, Barker S, Baron J (Editors). Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2003). Adelaide, Australia; 2003 Dec 7-10; p 142-151. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Figtree, NSW, Australia.
5. Dalgarno B, Hedberg J, Harper B. 2002. The contribution of 3D environments to conceptual understanding. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE 2002). Auckland, New Zealand; 2002, Dec 8-11. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Figtree, NSW, Australia. URL: [accessed 29 May 2010].
6. Drake RL. 1999. Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum. Kaibogaku Zasshi 74: 487-490.
7. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2009. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2: 253-259.
8. Fleming ND. 1995. I'm different; not dumb. Modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. In: Zelmer A, Zemler L (Editors). Research and Development in Higher Education: Blending Tradition and Technology. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA 1995); Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia; 1995 Jul 4-8. HERDSA 18:308-313. The Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia: Milperra, NSW, Australia.
9. Fleming ND. 2010. VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles. Christchurch, New Zealand. URL: [accessed 29 May 2010].
10. Flexner A. 1910. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No 4. Boston, MA: D.B. Updike, The Merrymount Press. 336 p.
11. Garg A, Norman G, Spero L, Taylor I. 1999a. Learning anatomy: Do new computer models improve spatial understanding? Med Teach 21: 519-522.
12. Garg A, Norman GR, Spero L, Maheshwari P. 1999b. Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? Acad Med 74: S87-S89.
13. Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. 2001. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 357: 363-364.
14. Guillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C. 2007. Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12: 491-507.
15. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Cohen C, Montello DR, Lippa Y. 2007. The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In: Allen GL (Editor). Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. p 285-316.
16. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Montello DR. 2009. How spatial ability enhances, and is enhanced by, dental education. Learn Individ Differ 19: 61-70.
17. Hegarty M, Sims VK. 1994. Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Mem Cognit 22: 411-430.
18. Hoyek N, Collet C, Rastello O, Fargier P, Thiriet P, Guillot A. 2009. Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning. Teach Learn Med 21: 201-206.
19. Huk T. 2006. Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. J Comput Assist Learn 22: 392-404.
20. Irby DM, Wilkerson L. 2003. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med 18: 370-376.
21. Jastrow H, Vollrath L. 2003. Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project. Clin Anat 16: 44-54.
22. Jones MG, Bokinsky A, Tretter TT, Negishi A. 2005. A comparison of learning with haptic and visual modalities. Haptics-e 3: 1-20.
23. Ko K, Webster JM. 1995. Holographic imaging of human brain preparations-A step toward virtual medicine. Surg Neurol 44: 428-432.
24. Kockro RA, Stadie A, Schwandt E, Reisch R, Charalampaki C, Ng I, Yeo TT, Hwang P, Serra L, Perneczky A. 2007. A collaborative virtual reality environment for neurosurgical planning and training. Neurosurgery 61: 379-391.
25. Lemole GMJr, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. 2007. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: Part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 61: 142-148.
26. Levinson AJ, Weaver B, Garside S, McGinn H, Norman GR. 2007. Virtual reality and brain anatomy: A randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs. Med Educ 41: 495-501.
27. Lowry R. 2010. Fisher Exact Probability Test: 2x4. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY. URL: [accessed 1 September 2010].
28. Marks SCJr. 2000. The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: The implications for anatomy and dissection. Clin Anat 13: 448-452.
29. McGee MG. 1979. Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychol Bull 86: 889-918.
30. Nicholson D, Chalk C, Funnell WR, Daniel SJ. 2008. The evidence for virtual reality. Med Educ 42: 224-224.
31. Nolte J, Angevine JBJr. 2007. The Human Brain in Photographs and Diagrams. 3rd Ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc. 272p.
32. Nowinski WL, Thirunavuukarasuu A, Volkau I, Marchenko Y, Aminah B, Gelas A, Huang S, Lee LC, Liu J, Ng TT, Nowinska NG, Qian GY, Puspitasari F, Runge VM. 2009. A new presentation and exploration of human cerebral vasculature correlated with surface and sectional neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2: 24-33.
33. Oh CS, Kim JY, Choe YH. 2009. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models. Anat Sci Educ 2: 156-159.
34. Older J. 2004. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2: 79-90.
35. Pabst R, Rothkotter HJ. 1997. Retrospective evaluation of undergraduate medical education by doctors at the end of their residency time in hospitals: consequences for the anatomical curriculum. Anat Rec 249: 431-434.
36. Peters M, Manning JT, Reimers S. 2007. The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Arch Sex Behav 36: 251-260.
37. Piburn MD, Reynolds SJ, McAuliffe C, Leedy DE, Birk JP, Johnson JK. 2005. The role of visualization in learning from computer-based images. Int J Sci Educ 27: 513-527.
38. Prince KJ, Scherpbier AJ, van Mameren H, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP. 2005. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Med Educ 39: 326-332.
39. Rochford K. 1985. Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Med Educ 19: 13-26.
40. Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Rhoton ALJr, Fukushima Y, Osawa S, Kawashima M, Oka H, Fujii K. 2006. Anatomic dissection and classic three-dimensional documentation: A unit of education for neurosurgical anatomy revisited. Neurosurgery 58: E1000.
41. Stern BJ, Lowenstein DH, Schuh LA. 2008. Invited article: Neurology education research. Neurology 70: 876-883.
42. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83-93.
43. Sundsten JW. 1994. Digital Anatomist: The Interactive Brain Atlas. Structural Information Group, Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. URL: [accessed 10 August 2010]
44. Tancred E, Coppa G. 1991. BrainStorm: Interactive Neuroanatomy (CD-ROM), Version 3.61. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of New South Wales, Educational Media Unit.
45. Turney BW. 2007. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89: 104-107.
46. van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. 2009. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: A current review. Surg Endosc 23: 1180-1190.
47. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. 2005. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat 18: 380-384.
48. Webb PA. 2000. A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector. J Med Eng Technol 24: 149-153.
49. Winkelmann A. 2007. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: A review of the evidence. Med Educ 41: 15-22.
50. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A metaanalysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117: 250-270.
51. Wu H-K, Shah P. 2004. Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Sci Educ 88: 465-492.
52. Wurm G, Tomancok B, Pogady P, Holl K, Trenkler J. 2004. Cerebrovascular stereolithographic biomodeling for aneurysm surgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 100: 139-145.