Teaching on Three-Dimensional Presentation Does Not Improve the Understanding of According CT Images: A Randomized Controlled Study

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 140-148

  Metzler, Rebecca ^a   Stein, Daniel ^b   Tetzlaff, Ralf ^b   Bruckner, Thomas ^a   Meinzer, Hans Peter ^b   Büchler, Markus W ^a   Kadmon, Martina ^a   Müller Stich, Beat P ^a   Fischer, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; TEACHING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84859701482     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2012.664963     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Miller, R. 2000. Approaches to learning spatial relationships in gross anatomy: Perspective from wider principles of learning. Clinical Anatomy, 13: 439-43.
2. Lamadé, W, Glombitza, GFischer, L. 2000. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Archives of Surgery, 135: 1256-61.
3. De Simone, R, Glombitza, G, Vahl, C F, Meinzer, H P and Hagl, S. 2000. Three-dimensional color Doppler flow reconstruction and its clinical applications. Echocardiography, 17: 765-71.
4. Beranova, E and Sykes, C. 2007. A systematic review of computer-based softwares for educating patients with coronary heart disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 66: 21-8.
5. Blavier, A, Gaudissart, Q, Cadiere, G B and Nyssen, A S. 2006. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 106: 662-4.
6. Mastrangelo, M J Jr., Adrales, GMcKinlay, R. 2003. Inclusion of 3-D computed tomography rendering and immersive VR in a third year medical student surgery curriculum. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 94: 199-203.
7. Prinz, A, Bolz, M and Findl, O. 2005. Advantage of three dimensional animated teaching over traditional surgical videos for teaching ophthalmic surgery: A randomised study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89: 1495-9.
8. Hermann, M. 2002. [3-dimensional computer animation-A new medium for supporting patient education before surgery. Acceptance and assessment of patients based on a prospective randomized study-picture versus text]. Chirurg, 73: 500-7.
9. Shepard, R N and Metzler, J. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171: 701-3.
10. Jansen-Osmann, P and Heil, M. 2007. Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 64: 217-27.
11. Larson, P, Rizzo, A ABuckwalter, J G. 1999. Gender issues in the use of virtual environments. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2: 113-23.
12. Beermann, J, Tetzlaff, RBruckner, T. 2010. Three-dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy. Medical Education, 44: 936-40.
13. Fischer, L, Cardenas, CThorn, M. 2002. Limits of Couinaud's liver segment classification: A quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 26: 962-7.
14. Fischer, L, Tetzlaff, RSchobinger, M. 2010. How many CT detector rows are necessary to perform adequate three dimensional visualization?. European Journal of Radiology, 74: e144-8.
15. Fischer, L, Thorn, MNeumann, J O. 2005. The segments of the hepatic veins-is there a spatial correlation to the Couinaud liver segments?. European Journal of Radiology, 53: 245-55.
16. Fischer, L, Schoebinger, MNeumann, J O. 2008. Does preoperative analysis of intrahepatic venous anastomoses improve the surgeon's intraoperative decision making? Pilot data from a case report. Patient Safety in Surgery, 2: 19
17. Wolf, I, Vetter, MWegner, I. 2005. The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Medical Image Analysis, 9: 594-604.
18. Olson, I R and Jiang, Y. 2004. Visual short-term memory is not improved by training. Memory and Cognition, 32: 1326-32.
19. Algarabel, S, Pitarque, A and Gotor, A. 2006. Effect of retention interval on the simultaneous cognate-noncognate and remember-know mirror effects. Memory, 14: 79-86.
20. Curby, K M, Glazek, K and Gauthier, I. 2009. A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35: 94-107.
21. Roediger, H L and Karpicke, J D. 2006. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17: 249-55.
22. Jonides, J, Lewis, R L, Nee, D E, Lustig, C A, Berman, M G and Moore, K S. 2008. The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 193-224.
23. Rochford, K. 1985. Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education, 19: 13-26.