Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 914-925

  Geisinger, Brandi N ^a   Raman, D Raj ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attrition; Engineering education; Retention; STEM education

Indexed keywords

ATTRITION; CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; ENGINEERING PROGRAM; LITERATURE REVIEWS; RETENTION; RETENTION STRATEGIES; STEM EDUCATION; STUDENT RETENTION;

ECONOMICS; ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84884177980     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (81)

1. S. S. Steinberg, The relations of secondary mathematics to engineering education, Mathematics teacher, 42(8), 1949.
2. E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.
3. B. Amadei, Engineering for the developing world, National Academy of Engineering, http://engineeringchallenges.org, 2011.
4. C. Ottery, Lack of engineers stifling development, says report, Science and Development Network, http://www. scidev.net, 2010.
5. C. Adelman, Women and men of the engineering path: A model for the analysis of undergraduate careers, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1998.
6. R. D. Augustine, Persistence and attrition of engineering students: A study of freshman and sophomore engineering students at three Midwestern universities, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, 1966.
7. M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering, Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 1997, pp. 139-149.
8. S. G. Brainard and L. Carlin,Asix-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 1998, pp. 369-375.
9. G. Huang, N. Taddese, E. Walter and S. S. Peng, Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2000.
10. E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students, Economics of Education Review, 29, 2010, pp. 935-946.
11. L. McDade, Knowing the "right stuff": Gender, attrition, and scientific literacy, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19(2), 1988, pp. 93-114.
12. J. E. Froyd and M.Ohland, Integrated engineering curricula, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 2005, pp. 147-164.
13. P. A. Daempfle,Ananalysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2002.
14. M. D. Ott, Retention of men and women engineering students, Research in Higher Education, 9(2), 1978, pp. 137-150.
15. R. Suresh, The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering, Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), 2006, pp. 215-239.
16. S. Wee, R. M. Cordova-Wentling, R. F. Korte, S. M. Larson and M. C. Loui, Why many smart women leave engineering: Apreliminary study of how engineering students form career goals, Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC, 2010.
17. X. Chen and W. Thomas, Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education, NCES 2009-161, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC, 2009.
18. R. B. Freeman and E. Jin, Where do new US-trained scienceengineering PhDs come from?, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2003, https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/conferences/ upload/2003may/chericonf2003-03.pdf.
19. E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
20. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Carnegie Classifications, http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org, accessed 14 July 2012.
21. E. Seymour, The problem iceberg in science, mathematics, and engineering education: Student explanations for high attrition rates, Journal of College Science Teaching, 21(4), 1992, pp. 230-238.
22. R. M. Marra, D. Shen, K. A. Rodgers and B. Bogue, Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Researcher's Association, San Diego, CA, 2009.
23. W. Tyson, R. Lee, K. M. Borman and M. A. Hanson, Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 2007, pp. 243- 270.
24. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, Learning and teaching styles in engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 1988, pp. 674-681.
25. L. Fleming, K. Engerman and D. Williams, Why students leave engineering: The unexpected bond, Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Chicago, IL, 2006.
26. A. C. Johnson, Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color, Science Education, 91, 2007, pp. 805-821.
27. N. C. Lagoudas,Womenin engineering at the undergraduate level, Honors Fellow Thesis, Texas A&M University, 2009.
28. R. Marra, B. Bogue, D. Shen and K. Rodgers, Those that leave: Assessing why students leave engineering, Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
29. M. S. Sondgeroth and L. M. Stough, Factors influencing the persistence of ethnic minority students enrolled in a college engineering program. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, 1992.
30. A. C. Strenta, R. Elliot, R. Adair, M. Matier and J. Scott, Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions, Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 1994, pp. 513-537.
31. D. C. Woolston, K. Shook and J. Wilson, Same problem, different solutions: Attempts at improving retention in engineering at a research vs. a teaching university, Proceedings of the 25th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Atlanta, GA, 1995.
32. S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia and K. McBeath, Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors, International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(5), 2007, pp. 929- 940.
33. L. E. Bernold, J. E. Spurlin and C.M. Anson, Understanding our students: A longitudinal study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention, Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 2007, pp. 263-274.
34. A. Cabrera, C. Colbeck and P. Terenzini, Teaching for professional competence: Instructional practices that promote development of group problem solving and design skills, Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, 1998.
35. U. Gneezy, K. L. Leonard and J. A. List, Gender differences in competition: The role of socialization, University of Chicago, mimeo, 2006.
36. R. Stevens, K. O'Conner, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns and D. M. Amos, Becoming an engineer: Toward a three-dimensional view of engineering learning, Journal of Engineering Education, 9(3), 2008, pp. 335-368.
37. C. Baillie and G. Fitzgerald, Motivation and attrition in engineering students, European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(2), 2000, pp. 145-155.
38. R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder and E. J. Dietz, The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 2002, pp. 3-17.
39. J. Grandy, Persistence in science of high-ability minority students: Results of a longitudinal study, Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 1998, pp. 589-620.
40. W. C. Leuwerke, S. Robbins, R. Sawyer and M. Hovland, Predicting engineering major status from mathematics achievement and interest congruence, Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 2004, pp. 135-149.
41. B. F. French, J. C. Immekus and W. C. Oakes, An examination of indicators of engineering students' success and persistence, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 2005, 419-425.
42. K. G. Schaefers, D. L. Epperson andM.M.Nauta, Women's career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors?, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(2), 1997, pp. 173-183.
43. J. Levin and J. Wyckoff, Identification of student characteristics that predict persistence and success in an engineering college at the end of the sophomore year: Informing the practice of academic advising, Pennsylvania State University, 1990.
44. K. N. Rask and J. Tiefenthaler, The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics, The Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 2008, pp. 676-687.
45. B. Ost, The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences, Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 2010, pp. 923-934.
46. R.M.Felder, G. N. Felder,M.Mauney, C. E. Hamrin and E. J. Dietz, A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: Gender differences in student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 1995, 151-163.
47. A. E. Bell, S. J. Spencer, I. Iserman and C. E. R. Logel, Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 2003, pp. 307-312.
48. A. L. Griffith, Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?, Economics of Education Review, 29, 2010, pp. 911-922.
49. S. Humphreys and R. Friedland, Retention in engineering:A study of freshman cohorts, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 1992.
50. M. W. Ohland, G. Zhang, B. Thorndyke and T. J. Anderson, Grade point average, changes of major, and majors selected by students leaving engineering, Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004.
51. B. Brigeman and C. Lewis, The relationship of essay and multiple-choice scores with grades in college courses, Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 1994, pp. 37-50.
52. R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner and D. Treistman, Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 2003, pp. 458-465.
53. C. M. Vogt, Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 2008, pp. 27-36.
54. G. E. DeBoer, Factors related to the decision of men and women to continue taking science courses in college, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(3), 1984, pp. 325-329.
55. M. M. Nauta, D. L. Epperson and K. M. Waggoner, Perceived causes of success and failure: Are women's attributions related to persistence in engineering majors?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 1999, pp. 663-676.
56. C. Moller-Wong and A. Eide, An engineering student retention study, Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 1997, pp. 7-15.
57. W. Tyson, Modeling engineering degree attainment using high school and college coursetaking and achievement, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 2011, 760-777.
58. G. Zhang, T. J. Anderson, M. W. Ohland, R. Carter and B. Thorndyke, Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation and retention: A longitudinal and cross institutional study, Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 2004, pp. 313-320.
59. M. W. Ohland, C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A. Long, S. M. Lord and M. H. Wasburn, Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 2011, pp. 225- 252.
60. J. Good, G. Halpin and G. Halpin, Retaining black students in engineering: Do minority programs have a longitudinal impact? Journal of College Student Retention, 3(4), 2002, pp. 351-364.
61. M. S. Hyde and J. Gess-Newsome, Adjusting educational practice to increase female persistence in the sciences, Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 1999, pp. 335-355.
62. A. P. Carnevale, J. Strohl and M. Melton, What's it worth? The economic value of college majors, Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Washington, DC, 2011.
63. S. R. Porter and R. L. Swing, Understanding how first year seminars affect persistence, Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 2006, pp. 89-109.
64. R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder and E. J. Dietz, A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: Comparisons with traditionally taught students, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 1998, pp. 469-480.
65. D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson and J. Sullivan, Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team based, first-year design projects, Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
66. M. Prince, Does active learning work?: A review of the research, Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 2004, pp. 223-231.
67. L. Springer, M. Stanne and S. Donovan, Effects of smallgroup learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 1999, pp. 21-51.
68. P. Terenzini, A. Cabrera, C. Colbeck, S. Bjorkland and J. Parente, Racial and ethnic diversity in the classroom: Does it promote student learning?, Journal of Higher Education, 72(5), 2001, 509-531.
69. J. Berson and W. Younkin, Doing well by doing good: A study of the effects of a service-learning experience on student success, Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, 1998.
70. G. Markus, J. Howard and D. King, Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment, Experimental Education and Policy Analysis, 15, 1993, pp. 410-419.
71. S. E. Brownell, M. J. Kloser, T. Fukami and R. Shavelson, Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based "cookbook" and authentic researchbased courses on student lab experiences, Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 2012, pp. 36-45.
72. M. Hoit and M. Ohland, Impact of a discipline-based introduction to engineering course on improving retention, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 1998, pp. 79-85.
73. N. Al-Holou, N. A. Gilgutay, C. Corleto, J. T. Demel, R. Felder, K. Frair, J. E. Froyd, M. Hoit, J. Morgan and D. L. Wells, First year integrated curricula: design alternatives and examples, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 1999, pp. 435-448.
74. E. Newton and L. Wells-Glover, Mentors for undergraduates in technical disciplines:Acollaborative effort by faculty, student development professionals, and alumni to improve undergraduate student retention and success in technical programs, Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 1999, pp. 311-321.
75. B. Bloom, The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Researcher, 13(6), 1984, pp. 4-16.
76. D. Street, S. Brown, C. Schramm and K. Gillespie, The impact of an in-class peer tutoring program on student social capital, Proceedings of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.
77. B. A. Nagda, S. R. Gregerman, J. Jonides, W. Hippel and J. S. Learner, Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention, Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 1998, pp. 55-72.
78. T. J. Webster, and K. C. Dee, Supplemental instruction integrated into an introductory engineering course, Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 1998, pp. 377-383.
79. E. Grant-Vallone, K. Reid, C. Umali and E. Pohlert, An analysis of the effects of self-esteem, social support, and participation in student support services on students' adjustment and commitment to college, Journal of College Student Retention, 5(3), 2004, pp. 255-274.
80. R. Perry and K. Penner, Enhancing academic achievement in college students through attributional retraining, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1990, pp. 262-271.
81. M. L. Smith and G. V. Glass, Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies, American Psychologist, 32(9), 1977, pp. 752-760.