Spindle assembly checkpoint proteins are positioned close to core microtubule attachment sites at kinetochores

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 202, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 735-746

  Varma, Dileep ^a   Wan, Xiaohu ^a   Cheerambathur, Dhanya ^b,c   Gassmann, Reto ^b,c,d   Suzuki, Aussie ^a   Lawrimore, Josh ^a   Desai, Arshad ^b,c   Salmon, E D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALPONIN; NDC80 COMPLEX; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2; SMALL INTERFERING RNA;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DYNEINS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MUTANT PROTEINS; NOCODAZOLE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS;

EID: 84884170422     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201304197     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barisic, M., B. Sohm, P. Mikolcevic, C. Wandke, V. Rauch, T. Ringer, M. Hess, G. Bonn, and S. Geley. 2010. Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:1968-1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0356
2. Basto, R., F. Scaerou, S. Mische, E. Wojcik, C. Lefebvre, R. Gomes, T. Hays, and R. Karess. 2004. In vivo dynamics of the rough deal checkpoint protein during Drosophila mitosis. Curr. Biol. 14:56-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.025
3. Buffin, E., C. Lefebvre, J. Huang, M.E. Gagou, and R.E. Karess. 2005. Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol. 15:856-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.052
4. Chan, G.K., S.A. Jablonski, D.A. Starr, M.L. Goldberg, and T.J. Yen. 2000. Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:944-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35046598
5. Chan, Y.W., L.L. Fava, A. Uldschmid, M.H. Schmitz, D.W. Gerlich, E.A. Nigg, and A. Santamaria. 2009. Mitotic control of kinetochore-associated dynein and spindle orientation by human Spindly. J. Cell Biol. 185:859- 874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200812167
6. Cheeseman, I.M., T. Hori, T. Fukagawa, and A. Desai. 2008. KNL1 and the CENPH/ I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:587-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1051
7. Civril, F., A. Wehenkel, F.M. Giorgi, S. Santaguida, A. Di Fonzo, G. Grigorean, F.D. Ciccarelli, and A. Musacchio. 2010. Structural analysis of the RZZ complex reveals common ancestry with multisubunit vesicle tethering machinery. Structure. 18:616-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.02.014
8. DeLuca, J.G., B.J. Howell, J.C. Canman, J.M. Hickey, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2003. Nuf2 and Hec1 are required for retention of the checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 13:2103-2109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.056
9. DeLuca, J.G., Y. Dong, P. Hergert, J. Strauss, J.M. Hickey, E.D. Salmon, and B.F. McEwen. 2005. Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16:519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0852
10. Famulski, J.K., and G.K. Chan. 2007. Aurora B kinase-dependent recruitment of hZW10 and hROD to tensionless kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 17:2143- 2149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.037
11. Famulski, J.K., L. Vos, X. Sun, and G. Chan. 2008. Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 180:507-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb .200708021
12. Gassmann, R., A. Essex, J.S. Hu, P.S. Maddox, F. Motegi, A. Sugimoto, S.M. O'Rourke, B. Bowerman, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, et al. 2008. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/ Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 22:2385-2399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1687508
13. Gassmann, R., A.J. Holland, D. Varma, X. Wan, F. Civril, D.W. Cleveland, K. Oegema, E.D. Salmon, and A. Desai. 2010. Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev. 24:957-971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.1886810
14. Griffis, E.R., N. Stuurman, and R.D. Vale. 2007. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 177:1005-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.200702062
15. Guimaraes, G.J., Y. Dong, B.F. McEwen, and J.G. Deluca. 2008. Kinetochoremicrotubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 18:1778-1784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.012
16. Hoffman, D.B., C.G. Pearson, T.J. Yen, B.J. Howell, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:1995-2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.7.1995
17. Howell, B.J., B.F. McEwen, J.C. Canman, D.B. Hoffman, E.M. Farrar, C.L. Rieder, and E.D. Salmon. 2001. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155:1159-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200105093
18. Howell, B.J., B. Moree, E.M. Farrar, S. Stewart, G. Fang, and E.D. Salmon. 2004. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14:953-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.053
19. Karess, R. 2005. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 15:386-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2005.05.003
20. Kasuboski, J.M., J.R. Bader, P.S. Vaughan, S.B. Tauhata, M. Winding, M.A. Morrissey, M.V. Joyce, W. Boggess, L. Vos, G.K. Chan, et al. 2011. Zwint-1 is a novel Aurora B substrate required for the assembly of a dyneinbinding platform on kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:3318-3330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0213
21. Kim, S., H. Sun, D.R. Tomchick, H. Yu, and X. Luo. 2012. Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:6549-6554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118210109
22. King, J.M., T.S. Hays, and R.B. Nicklas. 2000. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 151:739-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.4.739
23. Kiyomitsu, T., C. Obuse, and M. Yanagida. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell. 13:663-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.005
24. Kops, G.J., Y. Kim, B.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J.R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 169:49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411118
25. Lampson, M.A., and I.M. Cheeseman. 2011. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21:133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.007
26. Lara-Gonzalez, P., F.G. Westhorpe, and S.S. Taylor. 2012. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22:R966-R980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.006
27. Lin, Y.T., Y. Chen, G. Wu, and W.H. Lee. 2006. Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control. Oncogene. 25:6901-6914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209687
28. Maddox, P.S., B. Moree, J.C. Canman, and E.D. Salmon. 2003. Spinning disk confocal microscope system for rapid high-resolution, multimode, fluorescence speckle microscopy and green fluorescent protein imaging in living cells. Methods Enzymol. 360:597-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(03)60130-8
29. Maldonado, M., and T.M. Kapoor. 2011. Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:475-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2223
30. Maresca, T.J., and E.D. Salmon. 2010. Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J. Cell Sci. 123:825-835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.064790
31. McEwen, B.F., and Y. Dong. 2010. Contrasting models for kinetochore microtubule attachment in mammalian cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67:2163-2172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0322-x
32. Musacchio, A. 2011. Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366:3595-3604. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1098/rstb.2011.0072
33. Musacchio, A., and E.D. Salmon. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2163
34. Pagliuca, C., V.M. Draviam, E. Marco, P.K. Sorger, and P. De Wulf. 2009. Roles for the conserved spc105p/kre28p complex in kinetochore-microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS ONE. 4:e7640. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007640
35. Petrovic, A., S. Pasqualato, P. Dube, V. Krenn, S. Santaguida, D. Cittaro, S. Monzani, L. Massimiliano, J. Keller, A. Tarricone, et al. 2010. The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 190:835-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002070
36. Starr, D.A., R. Saffery, Z. Li, A.E. Simpson, K.H. Choo, T.J. Yen, and M.L. Goldberg. 2000. HZwint-1, a novel human kinetochore component that interacts with HZW10. J. Cell Sci. 113:1939-1950.
37. Sundin, L.J., G.J. Guimaraes, and J.G. Deluca. 2011. The NDC80 complex proteins Nuf2 and Hec1 make distinct contributions to kinetochoremicrotubule attachment in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:759-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0671
38. Varma, D., and E.D. Salmon. 2012. The KMN protein network-chief conductors of the kinetochore orchestra. J. Cell Sci. 125:5927-5936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.093724
39. Wan, X., R.P. O'Quinn, H.L. Pierce, A.P. Joglekar, W.E. Gall, J.G. DeLuca, C.W. Carroll, S.T. Liu, T.J. Yen, B.F. McEwen, et al. 2009. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell. 137:672-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.035
40. Wan, X., D. Cimini, L.A. Cameron, and E.D. Salmon. 2012. The coupling between sister kinetochore directional instability and oscillations in centromere stretch in metaphase PtK1 cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 23:1035-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-09-0767
41. Wang, H., X. Hu, X. Ding, Z. Dou, Z. Yang, A.W. Shaw, M. Teng, D.W. Cleveland, M.L. Goldberg, L. Niu, and X. Yao. 2004. Human Zwint-1 specifies localization of Zeste White 10 to kinetochores and is essential for mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54590-54598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M407588200
42. Wojcik, E., R. Basto, M. Serr, F. Scaërou, R. Karess, and T. Hays. 2001. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1001-1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1101-1001
43. Yamamoto, T.G., S. Watanabe, A. Essex, and R. Kitagawa. 2008. SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 183:187-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200805185