Influence of motor planning on distance perception within the peripersonal space

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Kirsch, Wladimir ^a   Herbort, Oliver ^b   Butz, Martin V ^b   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; HAND; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CUES; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860113579     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034880     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bhalla M, Proffitt DR, (1999) Visual-Motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25 (4): 1076-1096.
2. Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W, (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science 14 (2): 106-112.
3. Proffitt DR, (2008) An Action Specific Approach to Spatial Perception. In: RL InKlatzky, B MacWhinney, M Behrmann, Embodiment editors, Ego-Space, editors. and Action New York Psychology Press pp. 179-202.
4. Witt JK, Linkenauger, SA, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR, (2008) Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 (3): 581-585.
5. Witt JK, Dorsch TE, (2009) Kicking to bigger uprights: Field goal kicking performance influences perceived size. Perception 38 (9): 1328-1340.
6. Witt JK, Proffitt DR, (2005) See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychological Science 16 (12): 937-938.
7. Làdavas E, (2002) Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 17-22.
8. Làdavas E, Serino A, (2008) Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology 25 (7-8): 1099-1113.
9. Farnè A, Làdavas E, (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following toll use. Neuroreport 11 (8): 1645-1649.
10. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y, (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330.
11. Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J, (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39: 580-585.
12. Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters 372: 62-67.
13. Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J, (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83: B25-B34.
14. Berti A, Frassinetti F, (2000) When far space becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (3): 415-420.
15. Jewell G, McCourt ME, (2000) Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38: 93-110.
16. Longo MR, Lourenco SF, (2006) On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 44: 977-981.
17. Longo MR, Lourenco SF, (2007) Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Experimental Brain Research 177: 285-290.
18. Gamberini L, Seraglia B, Priftis K, (2008) Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: Evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments. Neuropsychologia 46 (5): 1298-1304.
19. Lourenco SF, Longo MR, (2009) The plasticity of near space: Evidence for contraction. Cognition 112: 451-456.
20. Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W, (2005) Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (5): 880-888.
21. Witt JK, Proffitt DR, (2008) Action-specific Influences on Distance Perception: A Role for Motor Simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34 (6): 1479-1492.
22. Witt JK, (2011) Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measure of perceived distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance DOI:10.1037/a0021933.
23. Scheerer E, (1984) Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In: W InPrinz, AF Sanders, editors. editors Cognition and motor processes. Berlin Springer-Verlag pp. 77-98.
24. Witt JK, Proffitt D, Epstein W, (2010) When and how are spatial perceptions scaled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36 (5): 1153-1160.
25. Fajen BR, (2007) Affordance-based control of visually guided action. Ecological Psychology 19 (4): 383-410.
26. Van der Heijden AHC, Müsseler J, Bridgeman B, (1999) On the perception of positions. In: G InAschersleben, T Bachmann, J Müsseler, spatial editorsCognitivecontributionstotheperceptionof, Psychology temporalevents(Advancesin, editors. Vol 129). Amsterdam Elsevier pp. 19-37.
27. Linkenauger SA, Witt JK, Stefanucci JK, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR, (2009) The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 35: 1649-60.
28. Proffitt DR, (2006) Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 110-122.
29. Rosenbaum D, (2008) Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (6): 1100-1104.
30. Flash T, Hogan N, (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience 5 (7): 1688-1703.
31. Harris CM, Wolpert DM, (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784.
32. Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R, (1989) Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Biological Cybernetics 61: 89-101.
33. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI, (1996) Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. The Journal of Neuroscience 16 (21): 7085-7096.
34. Loftus GR, Masson, MEJ, (1994) Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Reviews 1 (4): 476-490.
35. Hamburger K, Hansen T, (2010) Analysis of individual variations in the classical horizontal-vertical illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72 (4): 1045-1052.
36. Caparos S, Linnell KJ, (2010) The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 36 (5): 1080-1107.
37. Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P, (1993) The mental representation of parity and numerical magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (3): 371-396.
38. Gevers W, Lammertyn J, (2005) The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science 47: 10-21.
39. Schwarz W, Keus IM, (2004) Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics 66 (4): 651-664.
40. Ito Y, Hatta T, (2004) Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition 32 (4): 662-673.
41. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C, (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements: I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Experimental Brain Research 99 (1): 97-111.
42. Vindras P, Viviani P, (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24 (2): 569-591.
43. Desmurget M, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Russo GS, Alexander GE, Grafton ST, (2005) Updating target location at the end of an orienting saccade affects the characteristics of simple point-to-point movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (6): 1510-1536.