Self-awareness and action

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 219-224

  Blakemore, Sarah Jayne ^a   Frith, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; BEHAVIOR; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN REGION; DELUSION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MENTAL DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SELF CONCEPT; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

EID: 0037720160     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00043-6     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. 269:1995;1880-1882.
2. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;R729-R732.
3. Fourneret P., Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 36:1998;1133-1140.
4. Franck N., Farrer C., Georgieff N., Marie-Cardine M., Dalery J., d'Amato T., Jeannerod M. Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry. 158:2001;454-459 In this study, subjects performed simple manual gestures while watching visual feedback of their hand movements on a computer-controlled video monitor.Parametric degrees of temporal and spatial discrepancies were introduced between the subjects' hand movements and the visual feedback. Control subjects noticed the discrepancy at a delay of approximately 150 ms and a spatial mismatch of 15 degrees. In contrast, patients with delusions of control were unaware of the discrepancy until a delay of 300 ms and a spatial discrepancy of 30 degrees.
5. Blakemore S.-J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.W. Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cog. Neurosci. 11:1999;551-559.
6. Libet B., Gleason C.A., Wright E.W., Pearl D.K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential): the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain. 106:1983;623-642.
7. Haggard P., Magno E. Localising awareness of action with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 127:1999;102-107.
8. Jeannerod M., Frak V. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9:1999;735-739.
9. Stephan K.M., Fink G.R., Passingham R.E., Silbersweig D., Ceballos-Baumann A.O., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;373-386.
10. Decety J., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Bettinardi V., Tadary B., Woods R., Mazziotta J.C., Fazio F. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature. 371:1994;600-602.
11. Nyberg L., Petersson K.M., Nilsson L.G., Sandblom J., Aberg C., Ingvar M. Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions. Neuroimage. 14:2001;521-528 This PET study demonstrated that verbal retrieval of action phrases is associated with reactivation of the left ventral motor cortex and the left inferior parietal cortex for actions that were either overtly or covertly performed during encoding. Reactivation of the left dorsal parietal cortex and the right cerebellum was restricted to actions that were originally performed overtly.
12. Naito E., Kochiyama T., Kitada R., Nakamura S., Matsumura M., Yonekura Y., Sadato N. Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J. Neurosci. 22:2002;3683-3691 In this PET study, the neural correlates of an illusory wrist movement elicited by tendon vibration was compared with motor imagery of the same type of wrist movement. Motor imagery and the illusory kinesthetic sensation activated a common network of contralateral motor areas and the ipsilateral cerebellum. Together, these results suggest that it may be the kinesthetic sensation during mental imagery that activates these motor regions of the brain.
13. Thomas A.K., Loftus E.F. Creating bizarre false memories through imagination. Mem. Cognit. 30:2002;423-431 Subjects were presented with statements of bizarre or familiar actions, and had to either perform or imagine those actions 24 h later, subjects imagined performing a new set of actions, some of which had been presented in the first session. Two weeks later, subjects were tested for their memory of those actions. Actions that had been imagined in the first two sessions were more likely to be classified as performed actions than actions that had only been imagined in the first session. The more an action is imagined, the more likely it is to be confused with a performed action.
14. Gerardin E., Sirigu A., Lehericy S., Poline J.B., Gaymard B., Marsault C., Agid Y., Le Bihan D. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb. Cortex. 10:2000;1093-1104.
15. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R., Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science. 273:1996;1564-1568.
16. Danckert J., Ferber S., Doherty T., Steinmetz H., Nicolle D., Goodale M.A. Selective, non-lateralized impairment of motor imagery following right parietal damage. Neurocase. 8:2002;194-204 Normally there is a speed-accuracy trade-off for movements performed both in reality and in the imagination. Here, a subject with a right temporo-parietal lesion was tested on his ability to imagine and perform visually guided arm movements. There was a relationship between the speed and accuracy of his visually guided actions, but not between the accuracy and speed of his imagined movements. This result is interpreted as demonstrating the role of the right parietal cortex in generating and updating internal forward models of action.
17. Maruff P, Wilson PH, Currie J: Abnormalities of motor imagery associated with somatic passivity phenomena in schizophrenia. Schiz Res, in press.
18. Frith CD: The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
19. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.-J., Wolpert D.M. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Phil. Trans. Roy Soc. Lond.: Biol. Sci. 355:2000;1771-1778.
20. Haggard P., Eimer M. On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp. Brain Res. 126:1999;128-133.
21. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5:2002;382-385 This paper reports an elegant series of experiments investigating the awareness of actions and their sensory consequences. These experiments demonstrated a temporal 'binding' effect between actions that cause sensory stimuli (tones). This attraction between actions and their consequences may be a possible mechanism for classifying sensory events as self-generated.
22. Wegner D.M., Wheatley T. Apparent mental causation - sources of the experience of will. Am. Psychol. 54:1999;480-492.
23. Daprati E., Franck N., Georgieff N., Proust J., Pacherie E., Dalery J., Jeannerod M. Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition. 65:1997;71-86.
24. Daprati E., Sirigu A. Laterality effects on motor awareness. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;1379-1386 The ability of right-handers and left-handers to recognise their own hand movements was tested using a paradigm in which subjects saw on a computer screen either the visual feedback of their own hand movements or the experimenter's hand movements. When the experimenter pantomimed the subjects' hand movements, thus producing an ambiguous situation, subjects were more accurate in recognising their dominant hand than their non-dominant hand. This is the first study to show that the ability to recognise self-generated movements is affected by motor dominance.
25. Knoblich G., Prinz W. Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27:2001;456-465 This study showed that subjects are adept at recognising their own handwriting strokes when the stokes are played back to them, as long as the strokes are replayed at the correct velocity.
26. Knoblich G., Seigerschmidt E., Flach R., Prinz W. Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 55:2002;1027-1046 Subjects observed parts of earlier self-produced and other-produced writing strokes and were instructed to predict the following stroke. With no constraints, subjects are better at predicting strokes of their own writing than of other people's writing. When the writing strokes were made under constraints, however, the subjects were as good at predicting other people's writing strokes as their own. This was taken as evidence for action simulation.
27. Grafton S.T., Arbib M.A., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp. Brain Res. 112:1996;103-111.
28. Decety J., Grezes J., Costes N., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Procyk E., Grassi F., Fazio F. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain. 120:1997;1763-1777.
29. Grezes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:2001;1-19.
30. Iacoboni M., Koski L.M., Brass M., Bekkering H., Woods R.P., Dubeau M.C., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA. 98:2001;13995-13999.
31. Perani D., Fazio F., Borghese N.A., Tettamanti M., Ferrari S., Decety J., Gilardi M.C. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage. 14:2001;749-758 This study investigated the neural processing of the observation of real hand movements and hand movements produced in three-dimensional virtual reality. Only real actions in a natural environment activated a visuospatial network including the right posterior parietal cortex. This study suggests that the brain treats real and virtual hand movements differently.
32. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G.R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R.J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., Freund H.J. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13:2001;400-404 In this fMRI study, subjects observed actions that were performed with the mouth, the hand or the foot, and which did or did not involve an object. Different regions of premotor cortex were activated by actions that involved different body parts, roughly representing the homunculus in premotor cortex. The parietal lobe was activated when actions involved an object, and again the activation pattern in this region was different for different actions. This was the first study to demonstrate that action observation activates parts of the motor system in a functionally specific manner.
33. Avikainen S., Forss N., Hari R. Modulated activation of the human SI and SII cortices during observation of hand actions. Neuroimage. 15:2002;640-646.
34. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;546-550 Subjects were scanned using PET while imagining actions either from their own or from a third-person perspective. The parietal lobe was activated by action simulation in the third person perspective.
35. Decety J., Chaminade T., Grezes J., Meltzoff A.N. A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage. 15:2002;265-272 The parietal cortex was differentially activated when subjects imitated the experimenter compared with when the experimenter imitated the subject.
36. Farrer C., Frith C.D. Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage. 15:2002;596-603 Subjects were scanned in PET while controlling a moving dot on a computer screen. In some trials, subjects were in control of the dot's movement, whereas in other trials the dot was controlled by someone else and moved along a different trajectory from the subject's movements. The parietal cortex was activated more when someone else was in control of the dot's movement than during self-produced movements of the dot.
37. Chaminade T., Decety J. Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport. 13:2002;1975-1978.
38. Sirigu A., Daprati E., Pradat-Diehl P., Franck N., Jeannerod M. Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain. 122:1999;1867-1874.
39. Blakemore S.-J., Smith J., Steel R., Johnstone E., Frith C.D. The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychol. Med. 30:2000;1131-1139.
40. Blakemore S.-J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1:1998;635-640.
41. Spence S.A., Brooks D.J., Hirsch S.R., Liddle P.F., Meehan J., Grasby P.M. A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain. 120:1997;1997-2011.
42. Blakemore S-J, Oakley DA, Frith CD: Delusions of alien control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia In press.
43. Weiller C., Juptner M., Fellows S., Rijntjes M., Leonhardt G., Kiebel S., Muller S., Diener H.C., Thilmann A.F. Brain representation of active and passive movements. Neuroimage. 4:1996;105-110.