The Relationships Between Modelling and Argumentation from the Perspective of the Model of Modelling Diagram

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 2407-2434

  Mendonça, Paula Cristina Cardoso ^a   Justi, Rosária ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF OURO PRETO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Model of Modelling Diagram; Modelling based teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883554712     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.811615     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. von Auschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J. and Simon, S. 2008. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (1): 101 - 131. (doi:10.1002/tea.20213)
2. Baker, M. 2009. " Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge ". In Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices, Edited by: Mirza, N. M. and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. 127 - 144. Dordrecht: Springer.
3. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. and Keating, T. 2000. Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (7): 719 - 756. (doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<719::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-V)
4. Berland, L. K. and Reiser, B. J. 2009. Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93 (1): 26 - 55. (doi:10.1002/sce.20286)
5. Bottcher, F. and Meisert, A. 2010. Argumentation in science education: A model-based framework. Science & Education, 20 (2): 103 - 140. (doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5)
6. Braaten, M. and Windschitl, M. 2011. Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95 (4): 639 - 669. (doi:10.1002/sce.20449)
7. Clement, J. 2008. " Six levels of organization for curriculum design and teaching ". In Model based learning and instruction in science, Edited by: Clement, J. and Rea-Ramirez, M. A. 255 - 272. Dordrecht: Springer.
8. Clement, J. and Núñez-Oviedo, M. C. 2008. " A competition strategy and other modes for developing mental models in large group discussion ". In Model based learning and science instruction, Edited by: Clement, J. and Rea-Ramirez, M. A. 117 - 138. Dordrecht: Springer.
9. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism - protocol evidence on sources of creativity in science. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
10. Clement, J. and Rea-Ramirez, M. A. 2008. Model based learning and science instruction, Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. 2000. Research methods in education, 5, London: Routledge Falmer.
12. Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84 (3): 287 - 312. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A)
13. Duschl, R. A. and Ellenbogen, K. 2009. Argumentation and epistemic criteria: Investigating learners's reasons for reasons. Educación Quimica, 20 (2): 111 - 118.
14. Duschl, R. A. and Osborne, J. 2002. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38: 39 - 72. (doi:10.1080/03057260208560187)
15. Francoeur, E. 1997. The forgotten tool: The design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27: 7 - 40. (doi:10.1177/030631297027001002)
16. Furió, C. and Catalayud, M. L. 1996. Difficulties with geometry and polarity of molecules: Beyond misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 73 (1): 36 - 41. (doi:10.1021/ed073p36)
17. Giere, R. N. 1999. " Using models to represent reality ". In Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery, Edited by: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. J. and Thagard, P. 41 - 57. New York: Kluwer and Plenum Publishers.
18. Giere, R. N. 2001. A new framework for teaching scientific reasoning. Argumentation, 15: 21 - 33. (doi:10.1023/A:1007880010975)
19. Giere, R. N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71: 742 - 752. (doi:10.1086/425063)
20. Gilbert, J. K. 1997. " Models in science and science education ". In Exploring models and modelling in science and technology education: Contributions form the MISTRE Group, Edited by: Gilbert, J. K. 5 - 19. Reading: Faculty of Education and Community Studies, The University of Reading.
21. Gilbert, J. K. 2004. Models and Modelling: Routes to a more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2 (2): 115 - 130. (doi:10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4)
22. Gilbert, J. K. 2008. " Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education ". In Visualization: Theory and practice in science education, Edited by: Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M. and Nakhleh, M. 3 - 24. Dordrecht: Springer.
23. Gilbert, J. K. and Boulter, C. J. 1994. " Modelling across the curriculum: The demands and actualities of a unifying theme from science in the primary school ". In Science and technology education in a demanding society, Edited by: Boersma, K. and Trommel, K. J. 327 - 335. Enschede, The Netherlands: National Institute for Curriculum Development.
24. Gilbert, J. K. and Boulter, C. J. 1997. " Learning science through models and modelling ". In International handbook of science education, Edited by: Tobin, B. J. F. K. 53 - 66. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J. and Elmer, R. 2000. " Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education ". In Developing models in science education, Edited by: Gilbert, J. K. and Boulter, C. J. 3 - 17. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J. and Rutherford, M. 1998. Models in explanations, Part I: Horses for courses?. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (1): 83 - 97. (doi:10.1080/0950069980200106)
27. Gilbert, J. K., Justi, R., & Queiroz, A. S. (2010). The use of a model of modelling to develop visualization during the learning of ionic bonding. In M. F. Taşar & G. Çakmakci{dotless} (Eds.), Contemporary Science Education Research: International Perspectives (pp. 43-51). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
28. Hodson, D. 1992. In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (5): 541 - 562. (doi:10.1080/0950069920140506)
29. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. 2008. " Designing argumentation in learning environments ". In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, Edited by: Erduran, S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. 91 - 116. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. and Erduran, S. 2008. " Argumentation in science education: An overview ". In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, Edited by: Erduran, S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. 3 - 27. Dordrecht: Springer.
31. Justi, R. (2006). La Ensenãnza de Ciencias Baseada en La Elaboración de Modelos [Modelling-based science teaching]. Ensenãnza de Las Ciencias, 24(2), 173-194.
32. Justi, R. and Gilbert, J. K. 2002. Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (4): 369 - 387. (doi:10.1080/09500690110110142)
33. Justi, R., & Paganini, P. (2013). Co-construction of knowledge in a modeling-based teaching context. Paper presented at the NARST Conference, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
34. Kelly, G. J., Druker, S. and Chen, C. 1998. Student's reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (7): 849 - 871. (doi:10.1080/0950069980200707)
35. Kozma, R. B. and Russell, J. 1997. Multimedia and understanding expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (9): 949 - 968. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-U)
36. Kuhn, D. 1991. The skills of argument, New York: Cambridge University.
37. Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, P. C. (2011). In quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 919-951.
38. Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009a). Desenvolvimento de Habilidades em Atividades de Modelagem [Skills development in modeling-based activities]. Ensenãnza de Las Ciencias, 27(extra), 776-779.
39. Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009b). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630.
40. Mendonça, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2011). Contributions of the 'Model of Modelling' diagram to the learning of ionic bonding: Analysis of a case study. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 479-503.
41. Millar, R. and Osborne, J. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science education for the future, London: King's College.
42. National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
43. Nersessian, N. J. 1999. " Model-based reasoning in conceptual change ". In Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery, Edited by: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. J. and Thagard, P. 5 - 22. New York: Kluwer and Plenum Publishers.
44. Nersessian, N. J. 2002. " The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science ". In The cognitive basis of science, Edited by: Carruthers, P., Stich, S. and Siegal, M. 133 - 153. New York: Cambridge.
45. Passmore, C. and Stewart, J. 2002. A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (3): 185 - 204. (doi:10.1002/tea.10020)
46. Passmore, C. and Svoboda, J. 2011. Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (10): 1535 - 1554. (doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.577842)
47. Peterson, R. F. and Treagust, D. 1989. Grade 12 students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure. Journal of Chemical Education, 66 (6): 459 - 460. (doi:10.1021/ed066p459)
48. Raghavan, K. and Glaser, R. 1995. Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79 (1): 37 - 61. (doi:10.1002/sce.3730790104)
49. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations of future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472.
50. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D. and Krajcik, J. 2009. Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (6): 632 - 654. (doi:10.1002/tea.20311)
51. Schwarz, C. V., & Gewekwerere, Y. N. (2006). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teachers. Science Education, 91(1), 158-186.
52. Schwarz, C. V. and White, B. Y. 2005. Metamodeling knowledge: Developing student's understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23 (2): 165 - 205. (doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1)
53. Taber, K. S. 1994. Misunderstanding the ionic bond. Education in Chemistry, 31: 100 - 103.
54. Taylor, I., Barker, M. and Jones, A. 2003. Promoting mental model building in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (10): 1205 - 1225. (doi:10.1080/0950069022000017270a)
55. Teaching and Learning Research Programme. 2006. Science education in schools-Issues, evidence and proposals, London: The Association for Science Education.
56. Windschitl, M., Thompson, M. B. and Braaten, M. 2008. Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92 (5): 941 - 967. (doi:10.1002/sce.20259)