Ultrastructural analysis of wild type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster using helium ion microscopy

Micron

Volumn 51, Issue , 2013, Pages 26-35

  Boseman, Adam ^a   Nowlin, Kyle ^a   Ashraf, Sarmadia ^a   Yang, Jijin ^b   LaJeunesse, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b CARL ZEISS SMT AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bristles; Cuticle; Drosophila; Helium ion microscopy; Larval midgut; Nanostructres; SEM

Indexed keywords

BRISTLES; CUTICLE; DROSOPHILA; HELIUM ION MICROSCOPIES; LARVAL MIDGUT; NANOSTRUCTRES;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IONS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

ION MICROSCOPES;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HEXAPODA;

HELIUM; ION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BRISTLES; CHEMISTRY; CUTICLE; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HELIUM ION MICROSCOPY; LARVAL MIDGUT; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; NANOSTRUCTRES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BRISTLES; CUTICLE; DROSOPHILA; HELIUM ION MICROSCOPY; LARVAL MIDGUT; NANOSTRUCTRES; SEM;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HELIUM; IONS; MICROSCOPY;

EID: 84883454700     PISSN: 09684328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2013.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adler P.N., Charlton J., et al. The Drosophila tissue polarity gene inturned functions prior to wing hair morphogenesis in the regulation of hair polarity and number. Genetics 1994, 137(3):829-836.
2. Alkemade P.F., Koster E.M., et al. Imaging and nanofabrication with the helium ion microscope of the Van Leeuwenhoek Laboratory in Delft. Scanning 2012, 34(2):90-100.
3. Alsteens D., Garcia M.C., et al. Force-induced formation and propagation of adhesion nanodomains in living fungal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(48):20744-20749.
4. Arnold M., Schwieder M., et al. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. Soft Matter 2009, 5(1):72-77.
5. Bernhard C.G., Miller W.H., et al. Function of the corneal nipples in the compound eyes of insects. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 1963, 58:381-382.
6. Boden S.A., Asadollahbaik A., et al. Helium ion microscopy of Lepidoptera scales. Scanning 2012, 34(2):107-120.
7. Boyde A., Jones S.J. Scanning electron microscopy of bone: instrument, specimen, and issues. Microscopy Research and Technique 1996, 33(2):92-120.
8. Bray D.F., Bagu J., et al. Comparison of hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), Peldri II, and critical-point drying methods for scanning electron microscopy of biological specimens. Microscopy Research and Technique 1993, 26(6):489-495.
9. Bullock J., Federle W. Why have more than one pad per leg? Determining the mechanical and adhesive properties of hairy attachment pads in beetles. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology 2009, 153A(2). S130-S130.
10. Cant K., Knowles B.A., et al. Drosophila singed, a fascin homolog, is required for actin bundle formation during oogenesis and bristle extension. Journal of Cell Biology 1994, 125(2):369-380.
11. Carthew R.W. Pattern formation in the Drosophila eye. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 2007, 17(4):309-313.
12. Chen Y., Centonze V.E., et al. Imaging of cytoskeletal elements by low-temperature high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 1995, 179(Pt 1):67-76.
13. Di Giulio A., Maurizi E., et al. Functional structure of antennal sensilla in the myrmecophilous beetle Paussus favieri (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Paussini). Micron 2012, 43(6):705-719.
14. Dirks J.H., Clemente C.J., et al. Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2010, 7(45):587-593.
15. Ditsche-Kuru P., Schneider E.S., et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces of the water bug Notonecta glauca: a model for friction reduction and air retention. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 2011, 2:137-144.
16. Federle W. Why are so many adhesive pads hairy?. Journal of Experimental Biology 2006, 209(14):2611-2621.
17. Fei X., He B., et al. The growth of Drosophila bristles and laterals is not restricted to the tip or base. Journal of Cell Science 2002, 115(Pt 19):3797-3806.
18. Gemne G. Ultrastructural ontogenesis of cornea and corneal nipples in the compound eye of insects. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 1966, 66(4):511-512.
19. Georgiev P., Gerasimova T. Genes involved in the development of bristles and hairs in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 1992, 87(1):31-35.
20. Gorb S.N. The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 1998, 265(1398):747-752.
21. Gorb S.N., Sinha M., et al. Insects did it first: a micropatterned adhesive tape for robotic applications. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 2007, 2(4):S117-S125.
22. Guild G.M., Connelly P.S., et al. Long continuous actin bundles in Drosophila bristles are constructed by overlapping short filaments. Journal of Cell Biology 2003, 162(6):1069-1077.
23. Hansen W.R., Autumn K. Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(2):385-389.
24. Hazrin-Chong N.H., Manefield M. An alternative SEM drying method using hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) for microbial cell attachment studies on sub-bituminous coal. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2012, 90(2):96-99.
25. Hlawacek G., Veligura V., et al. Imaging ultra thin layers with helium ion microscopy: Utilizing the channeling contrast mechanism. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 2012, 3:507-512.
26. Hosoda N., Gorb S.N. Underwater locomotion in a terrestrial beetle: combination of surface de-wetting and capillary forces. Proceedings of Biological Sciences 2012, 279(1745):4236-4242.
27. Joy D.C., Griffin B.J. Is microanalysis possible in the helium ion microscope?. Microscopy and Microanalysis 2011, 17(4):643-649.
28. Klocke D., Schmitz H. Water as a major modulator of the mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7(7):2935-2942.
29. Kohane M., Daugela A., et al. Nanoscale in vivo evaluation of the stiffness of Drosophila melanogaster integument during development. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2003, 66A(3):633-642.
30. Kovalev A.E., Filippov A.E., et al. Insect wet steps: loss of fluid from insect feet adhering to a substrate. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2013, 10(78):20120639.
31. Kryuchkov M., Katanaev V.L., et al. Analysis of micro- and nano-structures of the corneal surface of Drosophila and its mutants by atomic force microscopy and optical diffraction. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(7):e22237.
32. Kumar J.P. Building an ommatidium one cell at a time. Developmental Dynamics 2012, 241(1):136-149.
33. LaJeunesse D.R., Johnson B., et al. Peristalsis in the junction region of the Drosophila larval midgut is modulated by DH31 expressing enteroendocrine cells. BMC Physiology 2010, 10:14.
34. Loveall B.J., Deitcher D.L. The essential role of bursicon during Drosophila development. BMC Developmental Biology 2010, 10.
35. Muscariello L., Rosso F., et al. A critical overview of ESEM applications in the biological field. Journal of Cellular Physiology 2005, 205(3):328-334.
36. Overton J. The fine structure of developing bristles in wild type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Morphology 1967, 122(4):367-379.
37. Pretorius E. Traditional coating techniques in scanning electron microscopy compared to uncoated charge compensator technology: looking at human blood fibrin networks with the ZEISS ULTRA Plus FEG-SEM. Microscopy Research and Technique 2010.
38. Ren N., He B., et al. The shavenoid gene of Drosophila encodes a novel actin cytoskeleton interacting protein that promotes wing hair morphogenesis. Genetics 2006, 172(3):1643-1653.
39. Schatten H. Low voltage high-resolution SEM (LVHRSEM) for biological structural and molecular analysis. Micron 2011, 42(2):175-185.
40. Stavenga D.G., Foletti S., et al. Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies. Proceedings of Biological Sciences 2006, 273(1587):661-667.
41. Stummteg B.F., Dicke A.W. Surface-structure of compound eye of various Drosophila species and eye mutants of Drosophila-Melanogaster. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1974, 44(6):262-265.
42. Talamillo A., Sanchez J., et al. Smt3 is required for Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis. Development 2008, 135(9):1659-1668.
43. Tardi N.J., Cook M., et al. Rapid phenotypic analysis of uncoated Drosophila samples with low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy. Fly (Austin) 2012, 6(3.).
44. Therrien M., Morrison D.K., et al. A genetic screen for modifiers of a kinase suppressor of Ras-dependent rough eye phenotype in Drosophila. Genetics 2000, 156(3):1231-1242.
45. Thomas B.J., Gunning D.A., et al. Cell cycle progression in the developing Drosophila eye: roughex encodes a novel protein required for the establishment of G1. Cell 1994, 77(7):1003-1014.
46. Tilney L.G., Connelly P., et al. F-actin bundles in Drosophila bristles are assembled from modules composed of short filaments. Journal of Cell Biology 1996, 135(5):1291-1308.
47. Tilney L.G., Connelly P.S., et al. Actin filament turnover regulated by cross-linking accounts for the size, shape, location, and number of actin bundles in Drosophila bristles. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2003, 14(10):3953-3966.
48. Tilney L.G., Tilney M.S., et al. F actin bundles in Drosophila bristles. I. Two filament cross-links are involved in bundling. Journal of Cell Biology 1995, 130(3):629-638.
49. Vanden Berg-Foels W.S., Scipioni L., et al. Helium ion microscopy for high-resolution visualization of the articular cartilage collagen network. Journal of Microscopy 2012, 246(2):168-176.
50. Vignaud T., Galland R., et al. Reprogramming cell shape with laser nano-patterning. Journal of Cell Science 2012, 125(Pt 9):2134-2140.
51. Wasserman J.D., Urban S., et al. A family of rhomboid-like genes: Drosophila rhomboid-1 and roughoid/rhomboid-3 cooperate to activate EGF receptor signaling. Genes & Development 2000, 14(13):1651-1663.
52. Watson G.S., Cribb B.W., et al. How micro/nanoarchitecture facilitates anti-wetting: an elegant hierarchical design on the termite wing. ACS Nano 2010, 4(1):129-136.
53. Wigglesworth V.B. Sclerotin and lipid in the waterproofing of the insect cuticle. Tissue and Cell 1985, 17(2):227-248.
54. Yao H., Della Rocca G., et al. Adhesion and sliding response of a biologically inspired fibrillar surface: experimental observations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2008, 5(24):723-733.
55. Zhang X.M., Zhang J.H., et al. Morphology and wettability control of silicon cone arrays using colloidal lithography. Langmuir 2009, 25(13):7375-7382.