Personalized integrated educational systems: Technology for the information-age paradigm of education in higher education

Teaching, Learning and the Net Generation: Concepts and Tools for Reaching Digital Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 41-60

  Reigeluth, Charles M ^a   Watson, William R ^b   Watson, Sunnie Lee ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883301810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-347-8.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1993). The research base for APA's learner-centered psychological principals. Taking research on learning seriously: Implications for teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.
2. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education. (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and the Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Attwell, G. (2007). E-portfolio: The DNA of the personal learning environment. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2).
5. Augar, N., Raiman, R., & Zhou, W. (2004). Teaching and learning online with wikis. Paper presented at the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference, Perth, Australia.
6. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the digital natives debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321-331. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
7. Bonk, C. J. (2008). YouTube anchors and enders: The use of shared online video content as a macrocontext for learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
8. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32. Retrieved from http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/MindsonFireOpenEducationt/45823.
9. Bunderson, C. V., Wiley, D. A., & McBride, R. (2009). Domain theory for instruction: Mapping attainments to enable learner-centered education. In Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3, pp. 327-347). New York, NY: Routledge.
10. Bush, M. D., & Mott, J. D. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology. Educational Technology Magazine, 49(March-April), 3-20.
11. Connolly, P. J. (2001). A standard for success. InfoWorld, 23(42), 57-58.
12. Duffy, P., & Bruns, A. (2006). The use of blogs, wikis and RSS in education: A conversation of possibilities. Paper presented at the Online Learning and Teaching Conference, Brisbane.
13. Frederickson, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.
14. Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J. M., & Richards, R. (2002). The nature and origin of instructional objects. In Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version.
15. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Colaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-77.
16. Grossman, L. (2006). Time's person of the year: You. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html?aid=434.
17. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
18. Hodgins, H. W. (2002). The future of learning objects. In Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version.
19. Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722-732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
20. Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarnot, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: Exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 332-343. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
21. Lamb, B. (2004). Wide open spaces: Wikis, ready or not. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 36-48.
22. Lum, L. (2006). The power of podcasting. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 23(2), 32-35.
23. Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading practices that work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. McCombs, B., & Whisler, J. (1997). The learnercentered classroom and school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Research Group. (1998). ID Expert: A second generation instructional development system. Instructional Science, 26(3-4), 242-262.
26. Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Mitchell, R. (1992). Testing for learning. New York, NY: The Free Press.
28. Prensky, M. (2009). H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate 5(3). Retrieved February 9, 2009, from http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=705.
29. Ranson, S., Martin, J., Nixon, J., & McKeown, P. (1996). Towards a theory of learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 44(1), 9-26. doi:10.1080/00071005.1996.9974055
30. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009). Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (1994). Envisioning a new system of education. In Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 59-70). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
32. Salisbury, D. F. (1990). Cognitive psychology and Its implications for designing drill and practice programs for computers. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(1), 23-30.
33. Schlechty, P. (2002). Working on the work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
34. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and selfefficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
35. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 207-231. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_2
36. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 183-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Szabo, M., & Flesher, K. (2002). CMI theory and practice: Historical roots of learning managment systems. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2002 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Montreal, Canada.
38. Watson, W. R., Lee, S., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2007). Learning management systems: An overview and roadmap of the systemic application of computers to education. In Neto, F. M. M., & Brasileiro, F. V. (Eds.), Advances in computer-supported learning (pp. 66-96). London, UK: Information Science Publishing.
39. Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become? TechTrends, 51(2), 28-34. doi:10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
40. Weller, M. (2009). Using learning environments as a metaphor for educational change. Horizon, 17(3), 181-189. doi:10.1108/10748120910993204
41. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
42. Wiley, D. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In Wiley, D. A. (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version.
43. Williams, J. B., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232-247. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/williams.html.
44. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvior, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2006). Personal learning environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Paper presented at the ECTEL Workshop on Learner-Oriented Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management-Oriented Learning, Heraklion, Crete.
45. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2