Domain theory for instruction: Mapping attainments to enable learner-centered education

Instructional-Design Theories and Models

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 327-347

  Victor Bunderson, C ^a   Wiley, David A ^b,d,e   McBride, Reo H ^c  

^a EduMetrics Institute   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Curriculum Management Department Herzing College Online   (United States)

^d Center for Open Sustainable Learning (COSL)   (United States)

^e Flat World Knowledge ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898365500     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203872130     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Alder, K. (2002). The measure of all things. New York: Free Press.
2. Baker, E. L. (2000). Understanding educational quality: Where validity meets technology. Fifth annual William H. Angoff memorial lecture, Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center, Princeton, NJ.
3. Bunderson, C. V. (2006). Developing a domain theory: Defining and exemplifying a learning theory of progressive attainments. In M. Garner, G. Engelhard, M. Wilson, & W. Fisher (Eds.), Advances in Rasch measurement (Vol. 1). Maple Grove, MN: JAM.
4. Bunderson, C. V., & Newby, V. A. (2006). The relationships among design experiments, invariant measurement scales, and domain theories. In M. Garner, G. Engelhard, M. Wilson, & W. Fisher (Eds.), Advances in Rasch measurement (Vol. 1). Maple Grove, MN: JAM.
5. Fisher, W. P. Jr. (2003a). Mathematics, measurement, metaphor and metaphysics I. Implications for method in postmodern science. Theory & Psychology, 13(6), 753-790.
6. Fisher, W. P. Jr. (2003b). Mathematics, measurement, metaphor and metaphysics II. Accounting for Galileo's "fateful omission." Theory & Psychology, 13(6), 791-828.
7. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
8. Gibbons, A. S., Bunderson, C. V., Olsen, J. B., & Rogers, J. (1995). Work mod els: Still beyond instructional objectives. Machine-Mediated Learning, 5, 221-236.
9. Gibbons, A. S., & Bunderson, C. V. (2005). Explore, explain, design. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (Vol.). Burlington, MA: Academic.
10. Kelly, A. E. (Ed.). (2003). Theme issue: The role of design in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-37.
11. Kyburg, H. (1992). Measuring errors of measurement. In C. Savage, & P. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philosophical and foundational issues in measurement theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Linacre, J. M. (1995). Facets Rasch Analysis. [Computer software] Chicago: MESA.
13. McBride, R. H. (2005a). The interplay of training materials development and rating scale development in the instruction of raters. Provo, UT: Author.
14. McBride, R. H. (2005b). A domain theory of fluent oral reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
15. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psycholo gist, 50, 741-749.
16. Newby, V., Conner, G., Grant, C., & Bunderson, V. (2006). The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. In M. Garner, G. Engelhard, M. Wilson, & W. Fisher (Eds.), Advances in Rasch measurement (Vol. 1). Maple Grove, MN: JAM.
17. Stenner, A. J. (1996). The Lexile framework for reading. Retrieved April 17, 2004, from http://www. lexile.com.
18. Trout, J. D. (1998). Measuring the intentional world, realism, naturalism, and quantitative methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Oxford Univer sity Press.
19. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
20. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Learning object design and sequencing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/docs/dissertation.pdf.