Learning management systems: An overview and roadmap of the systemic application of computers to education

Advances in Computer-Supported Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 66-96

  Watson, William R ^a   Lee, Sunnie ^b   Reigeluth, Charles M ^b  

^a Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900160280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-355-5.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Advanced Distributed Learning. (2003). Advanced distributed learning [Homepage of Advanced Distributed Learning]. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://adlnet.org/.
2. Alexander, S. (2001). Learning curve. InfoWorld, 23(23), 59-61.
3. Bailey, G. D. (1993). Wanted: A road map for understanding integrated learning systems. In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based integrated learning systems (pp. 3-9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
4. Becker, H. J. (1993). A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems. In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based integrated learning systems (pp. 11-31). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
5. Bracey, G. W. (1993). The bright future of integrated learning systems. In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based integrated learning systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
6. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
7. Brush, T. A., Armstrong, J., Barbrow, D., & Ulintz, L. (1999). Design and delivery of integrated learning systems: Their impact on students achievement and attitudes. Educational Computing Research, 21(4), 475-486.
8. Collins, A. (Ed.). (1992). Toward a design science of education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Co-nect, Inc. (2005, May 2). Our approach: Data-driven solutions to improve instruction. Retrieved May, 2, 2005, from http://plato.com/products_all.asp.
10. Connolly, P. J. (2001). A standard for success. InfoWorld, 23(42), 57-58.
11. Deubel, P. (2002). Selecting curriculum-based software. Learning & Leading with Technology, 29(5), 10-16.
12. Dunkel, P. A. (1999). Considerations in developing and using computer-adaptive tests to assess second language proficiency. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 77-93.
13. EDUCAUSE Evolving Technologies Committee. (2003). Course management systems (CMS). Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/DEC0302.pdf.
14. Felix, K. (2003). In the spotlight. MultiMedia Schools, 10(6), 49-50.
15. Foshay, R. (1998). Instructional philosophy and strategic direction of the PLATO system. Technical paper. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
16. Foshay, R. (2002). An overview of the research base of PLATO. Bloomington, MN: PLATO Learning, Inc.
17. Friesen, N., Roberts, A., & Fisher, S. (2002). Metadata for learning objects. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology (Online version), 28(3), 43-53. Retrieved July 10, 2005, from http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol28.3/friesen_etal.html.
18. Getting up to speed on learning management systems. (2002). Retrieved April 3, 2005, from http://www.brandonhall.com/public/execsums/execsum_gutsonlmss.pdf.
19. Gibbons, A. S., Nelson, J. M., & Richards, R. (2002). The nature and origin of instructional objects. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/gibbons.doc.
20. Gilhooly, K. (2001). Making e-learning effective. Computerworld, 35(29), 52-53.
21. Hodgins, H. W. (2002). The future of learning objects. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved March 13, 2005, http://reusability.org/read/chapters/hodgins.doc.
22. Joseph, R., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2002, July-August). Beyond technology integration: The case for technology transformation. Educational Technology, 42, 9-12.
23. Kulik, J. A. (2003). Instructional technology and school reform models. Ann Arbor: Office of Evaluations & Examinations, University of Michigan. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from http://www.schooldata.com/mdrtechhilites.asp.
24. Leslie, S. (2003). Important characteristics of course management systems: Findings from the Edutools.info project. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.edtechpost.ca/gems/cms_characteristics.htm.
25. McCombs, B., & Whisler, J. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. MERLOT. (2005). Multimedia educational resource for learning and online teaching Web site. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.merlot.org/.
27. Merrill, M. D. (2002). Knowledge objects to support inquiry-based, online learning. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/merrill.doc.
28. Miller, L., DeJean, J., & Miller, R. (2000). The literacy curriculum and use of an Integrated Learning System. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 123-135.
29. Oakes, K. (2002). E-learning: LCMS, LMS-They're not just acronyms but powerful systems for learning. T+D, 56(3), 73-75.
30. Pack, T. (2002). Corporate learning gets digital. EContent, 25(7), 22-27.
31. Parr, J. M., & Fung, I. (2001, September 28, 2004). A review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems, and outcomes with respect to literacy and numeracy. Retrieved April 2, 2005, from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=5499&indexid=6920&indexparentid=1024.
32. Parrish, P. E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(1), 49-57.
33. Pearson, Inc. (2005, May 2). Pearson Digital Learning: All products and services. Retrieved May, 2, 2005, from http://www.pearsondigital.com/products/.
34. PLATO, Inc. (2005, May 2). Products and services: All products and services. Retrieved May, 2, 2005, from http://plato.com/products_all.asp.
35. Reigeluth, C. M. (1994). The imperative for systemic change. In C. M. Reigeluth, & R. J. Garfinkle (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 3-12). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
36. Reigeluth, C. M. (1997, November). Educational standards: To standardize or to customize learning? Phi Delta Kappan, 79(3), 202-206.
37. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp.633-651). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Assocates, Publishers.
38. Reigeluth, C. M., & Garfinkle, R. J. (1994). Envisioning a new system of education. In C. M. Reigeluth & R. J. Garfinkle (Eds.), Systemic change in education (pp. 59-70). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
39. Reiser, R. A. (1987). Instructional technology: A history. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 11-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Ross, S. M., & Lowther, D. L. (2003). Impacts of the Co-nect school reform design on classroom instruction, school climate, and student achievement in inner-city schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 8(2), 215-246.
41. st century: Leadership imperatives for educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
42. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. Toronto, Canada: Currency.
43. Sherry, M. (1993). Integrated Learning Systems: What may we expect in the future? In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based Integrated Learning Systems (pp. 137-141). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
44. Shore, A., & Johnson, M. F. (1993). Integrated Learning Systems: A vision for the future. In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based Integrated Learning Systems (pp. 83-91). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
45. SkillsTutor, Inc. (2005, May 2). Why choose products developed by achievement technologies?: Instructional, supplemental, practical and effective. Retrieved May, 2, 2005, from http://skillstutor.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=products.home.
46. Successmaker. (1999). Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC ED447436). Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/23/c1/41.pdf.
47. Szabo, M., & Flesher, K. (2002). CMI theory and practice: Historical roots of learning management systems. Paper presented at the E-Learn World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Montreal, Canada.
48. Taylor, F. P. (2004). Education technology helps unite school communities, improve academic achievement. T.H.E. Journal, 31(10), 46-48.
49. Toffler, A. (1984). The third wave. New York: Bantam.
50. U.S. Department of Education, O. o. E. T. (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and today's students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
51. Van Dusen, L. M., & Worthen, B. R. (1994). The impact of Integrated Learning System implementation on student outcomes: Implications for research and evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 13-24.
52. Waterford early reading program. (1999). Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC ED447438). Retrieve April 18, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/23/c1/86.pdf.
53. Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc.