To pull or be pulled: Parsing the multiple modes of mechanotransduction

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 558-564

  Ricca, Benjamin L ^a   Venugopalan, Gautham ^a   Fletcher, Daniel A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPRESSION; ENVIRONMENT; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR;

EID: 84882840475     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Wolff J. Das gesetz der transformation der knochen 1892, Hirschwald, Berlin.
2. le Duc Q., Shi Q., Blonk I., Sonnenberg A., Wang N., Leckband D., de Rooij J. Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J Cell Biol 2010, 189:1107-1115.
3. Leckband D.E., le Duc Q., Wang N., de Rooij J. Mechanotransduction at cadherin-mediated adhesions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011, 23:523-530.
4. Wang Y., Botvinick E.L., Zhao Y., Berns M.W., Usami S., Tsien R.Y., Chien S. Visualizing the mechanical activation of Src. Nature 2005, 434:1040-1045.
5. Moore S.W., Roca-Cusachs P., Sheetz M.P. Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. Dev Cell 2010, 19:194-206.
6. Hoffman B.D., Grashoff C., Schwartz M.A. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 2011, 475:316-323.
7. Riveline D., Zamir E., Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Ishizaki T., Narumiya S., Kam Z., Geiger B., Bershadsky A.D. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 2001, 153:1175-1186.
8. Pasapera A.M., Schneider I.C., Rericha E., Schlaepfer D.D., Waterman C.M. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J Cell Biol 2010, 188:877-890.
9. Kawano T., Kidoaki S. Elasticity boundary conditions required for cell mechanotaxis on microelastically-patterned gels. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2725-2733.
10. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
11. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
12. Wong M., Siegrist M., Cao X. Cyclic compression of articular cartilage explants is associated with progressive consolidation and altered expression pattern of extracellular matrix proteins. Matrix Biol 1999, 18:391-399.
13. Murata M., Bonassar L.J., Wright M., Mankin H.J., Towle C.A. A role for the interleukin-1 receptor in the pathway linking static mechanical compression to decreased proteoglycan synthesis in surface articular cartilage. Arch Biochem Biophy 2003, 413:229-235.
14. Allen J.L., Cooke M.E., Alliston T. ECM stiffness primes the TGFβ pathway to promote chondrocyte differentiation. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:3731-3742.
15. Harris A.R., Charras G.T. Experimental validation of atomic force microscopy-based cell elasticity measurements. Nanotechnology 2011, 22:345102.
16. Lopez J.I., Kang I., You W., McDonald D.M., Weaver V.M. In situ force mapping of mammary gland transformation. Integr Biol (Camb) 2011, 3:910-921.
17. Gossett D.R., Tse H.T.K., Lee S.A., Ying Y., Lindgren A.G., Yang O.O., Rao J., Clark A.T., Di Carlo D. Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:7630-7635.
18. Evans E.A. Minimum energy analysis of membrane deformation applied to pipet aspiration and surface adhesion of red blood cells. Biophys J 1980, 30:265-284.
19. Houk A.R., Jilkine A., Mejean C.O., Boltyanskiy R., Dufresne E.R., Angenent S.B., Altschuler S.J., Wu L.F., Weiner O.D. Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration. Cell 2012, 148:175-188.
20. Wang N., Butler J.P., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993, 260:21.
21. Leipzig N.D., Athanasiou K.A. Unconfined creep compression of chondrocytes. J Biomech 2005, 38:77-85.
22. Desprat N., Richert A., Simeon J., Asnacios A. Creep function of a single living cell. Biophys J 2005, 88:2224-2233.
23. Mitchison T., Charras G., Mahadevan L. Implications of a poroelastic cytoplasm for the dynamics of animal cell shape. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2008, 19:215-223.
24. Mellon S., Tanner K. Bone and its adaptation to mechanical loading: a review. Int Mater Rev 2012, 57:235-255.
25. Grodzinsky A.J., Levenston M.E., Jin M., Frank E.H. Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000, 2:691-713.
26. Shyy J.Y., Chien S. Role of integrins in endothelial mechanosensing of shear stress. Circ Res 2002, 91:769-775.
27. Cheng G., Tse J., Jain R.K., Munn L.L. Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4632.
28. Tse J.M., Cheng G., Tyrrell J.A., Wilcox-Adelman S.A., Boucher Y., Jain R.K., Munn L.L. Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 3:911-916.
29. Matsumoto T., Yung Y.C., Fischbach C., Kong H.J., Nakaoka R., Mooney D.J. Mechanical strain regulates endothelial cell patterning in vitro. Tissue Eng 2007, 13:207-217.
30. Song J.W., Munn L.L. Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:15342-15347.
31. Guo C., Ouyang M., Yu J., Maslov J., Price A., Shen C. Long-range mechanical force enables self-assembly of epithelial tubular patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:5576-5582.
32. McGee K.M., Vartiainen M.K., Khaw P.T., Treisman R., Bailly M. Nuclear transport of the serum response factor coactivator MRTF-A is downregulated at tensional homeostasis. EMBO Rep 2011, 12:963-970.
33. Venkatesan Iyer K., Pulford S., Mogilner A., Shivashankar G.V. Mechanical activation of cells induces chromatin remodeling preceding MKL nuclear transport. Biophys J 2012, 103:1416-1428.
34. Galbraith C.G., Yamada K.M., Sheetz M.P. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 2002, 159:695-705.
35. Matthews B.D., Overby D.R., Mannix R., Ingber D.E. Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels. J Cell Sci 2006, 119:508-518.
36. 2+-dependent internalization of integrins in cultured endothelial cells. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:3859-3870.
37. Sinha B., Köster D., Ruez R., Gonnord P., Bastiani M., Abankwa D., Stan R.V., Butler-Browne G., Vedie B., Johannes L., Morone N., Parton R.G., Raposo G., Sens P., Lamaze C., Nassoy P. Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid disassembly of caveolae. Cell 2011, 144:402-413.
38. Guilluy C., Swaminathan V., Garcia-Mata R., O'Brien E.T., Superfine R., Burridge K. The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins. Nat Cell Biol 2011, 13:722-727.
39. Higashida C., Kiuchi T., Akiba Y., Mizuno H., Maruoka M., Narumiya S., Mizuno K., Watanabe N. F- and G-actin homeostasis regulates mechanosensitive actin nucleation by formins. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:395-405.
40. Phillips H.M., Steinberg M.S. Equilibrium measurements of embryonic chick cell adhesiveness. I. Shape equilibrium in centrifugal fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1969, 64:121-127.
41. Krieg M., Arboleda-Estudillo Y., Puech P., Käfer J., Graner F., Müller D.J., Heisenberg C. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:429-436.
42. James J.R., Vale R.D. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature 2012, 487:64-69.
43. Mitrossilis D., Fouchard J., Pereira D., Postic F., Richert A., Saint-Jean M., Asnacios A. Real-time single-cell response to stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:16518-16523.
44. Crow A., Webster K.D., Hohlfeld E., Ng W.P., Geissler P., Fletcher D.A. Contractile equilibration of single cells to step changes in extracellular stiffness. Biophys J 2012, 102:443-451.
45. Polackwich R.J., Koch D., Arevalo R., Miermont A.M., Jee K.J., Lazar J., Urbach J., Mueller S.C., McAllister R.G. A novel 3D fibril force assay implicates Src in tumor cell force generation in collagen networks. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e58138.
46. Saez A., Buguin A., Silberzan P., Ladoux B. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces?. Biophys J 2005, 89:L52-L54.
47. Mitrossilis D., Fouchard J., Guiroy A., Desprat N., Rodriguez N., Fabry B., Asnacios A Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:18243-18248.
48. Lam W.A., Chaudhuri O., Crow A., Webster K.D., Li T., Kita A., Huang J., Fletcher D.A. Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat Mater 2011, 10:61-66.
49. Webster K.D., Crow A., Fletcher D.A. An AFM-based stiffness clamp for dynamic control of rigidity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17807.
50. Kruse K., Joanny J.F., Jülicher F., Prost J., Sekimoto K. Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. Eur Phys J E: Soft Matter 2005, 16:5-16.
51. Juelicher F., Kruse K., Prost J., Joanny J. Active behavior of the cytoskeleton. Phys Rep 2007, 449:3-28.
52. Marcq P., Yoshinaga N., Prost J. Rigidity sensing explained by active matter theory. Biophys J 2011, 101:L33-L35.
53. Dupont S., Morsut L., Aragona M., Enzo E., Giulitti S., Cordenonsi M., Zanconato F., Le Digabel J., Forcato M., Bicciato S., Elvassore N., Piccolo S. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011, 474:179-183.
54. Kim J., Asthagiri A.R. Matrix stiffening sensitizes epithelial cells to EGF and enables the loss of contact inhibition of proliferation. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:1280-1287.
55. Lovett D.B., Shekhar N., Nickerson J.A., Roux K.J., Lele T.P. Modulation of nuclear shape by substrate rigidity. Cell Mol Bioeng 2013, 6:230-238.
56. Miyajima H., Matsumoto T., Sakai T., Yamaguchi S., An S.H., Abe M., Wakisaka S., Lee K.Y., Egusa H., Imazato S. Hydrogel-based biomimetic environment for in vitro modulation of branching morphogenesis. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6754-6763.
57. Fischer R.S., Gardel M., Ma X., Adelstein R.S., Waterman C.M. Local cortical tension by myosin II guides 3D endothelial cell branching. Curr Biol 2009, 19:260-265.
58. Myers K.A., Applegate K.T., Danuser G., Fischer R.S., Waterman C.M. Distinct ECM mechanosensing pathways regulate microtubule dynamics to control endothelial cell branching morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 2011, 192:321-334.
59. Banes A.J., Tsuzaki M., Yamamoto J., Brigman B., Fischer T., Brown T., Miller L. Mechanoreception at the cellular level: the detection, interpretation, and diversity of responses to mechanical signals. Biochem Cell Biol 1995, 73:349-365.
60. Brown R.A., Prajapati R., McGrouther D.A., Yannas I.V., Eastwood M. Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three-dimensional substrates. J Cell Physiol 1998, 175:323-332.
61. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., Reinhart-King C.A., Margulies S.S., Dembo M., Boettiger D., Hammer D.A., Weaver V.M. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:241-254.
62. Haswell E.S., Phillips R., Rees D.C. Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it?. Structure 2011, 19:1356-1369.
63. del Rio A., Perez-Jimenez R., Liu R., Roca-Cusachs P., Fernandez J.M., Sheetz M.P. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 2009, 323:638-641.
64. Na S., Collin O., Chowdhury F., Tay B., Ouyang M., Wang Y., Wang N. Rapid signal transduction in living cells is a unique feature of mechanotransduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:6626-6631.
65. Yeh Y., Hur S.S., Chang J., Wang K., Chiu J., Li Y., Chien S. Matrix stiffness regulates endothelial cell proliferation through Septin 9. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e46889.
66. Lele T.P., Pendse J., Kumar S., Salanga M., Karavitis J., Ingber D.E. Mechanical forces alter zyxin unbinding kinetics within focal adhesions of living cells. J Cell Physiol 2006, 207:187-194.
67. Colombelli J., Besser A., Kress H., Reynaud E.G., Girard P., Caussinus E., Haselmann U., Small J.V., Schwarz U.S., Stelzer E.H.K. Mechanosensing in actin stress fibers revealed by a close correlation between force and protein localization. J Cell Sci 2009, 122:1665-1679.
68. Aratyn-Schaus Y., Gardel M.L. Transient frictional slip between integrin and the ECM in focal adhesions under myosin II tension. Curr Biol 2010, 20:1145-1153.
69. Roca-Cusachs P., Del Rio A., Puklin-Faucher E., Gauthier N.C., Biais N., Sheetz M.P. Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by α-actinin triggers adhesion maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:E1361-E1370.
70. Plotnikov S.V., Pasapera A.M., Sabass B., Waterman C.M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 2012, 151:1513-1527.
71. Lambertz D., Souza T.O.L., Canon F., Xavier L.C.C., Ferraz K.M. Influence of overweight on the active and the passive fraction of the plantar flexors series elastic component in prepubertal children. J Appl Physiol 2013, 114:73-80.
72. Jensen J.H., Conley L.N., Hedegaard J., Nielsen M., Young J.F., Oksbjerg N., Hornshøj H., Bendixen C., Thomsen B. Gene expression profiling of porcine skeletal muscle in the early recovery phase following acute physical activity. Exp Physiol 2012, 97:833-848.