Quality in-training evaluation reports-does feedback drive faculty performance

Academic Medicine

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1129-1134

  Dudek, Nancy L ^a   Marks, Meridith B ^a   Bandiera, Glen ^b   White, Jonathan ^c   Wood, Timothy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882456756     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299394c     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Turnbull J, Van Barneveld C. Assessment of clinical performance: In-training evaluation. In: Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. London, UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
2. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Ainsworth MA. An innovative evaluation method in an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1996;71(1 suppl):S76-S78.
3. Cohen GS, Blumberg P, Ryan NC, Sullivan PL. Do final grades reflect written qualitative evaluations of student performance Teach Learn Med. 1993;5:10-15.
4. Hatala R, Norman GR. In-training evaluation during an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S118-S120.
5. Swing SR, Clyman SG, Holmboe ES, Williams RG. Advancing resident assessment in graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1:278-286.
6. Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, et al. Faculty development in assessment: The missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med. 2011;86:460-467.
7. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 suppl):S84-S87.
8. Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE, Huot SJ. Effects of training in direct observation of medical residents' clinical competence: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:874-881.
9. Littlefield JH, Darosa DA, Paukert J, Williams RG, Klamen DL, Schoolfield JD. Improving resident performance assessment data: Numeric precision and narrative specificity. Acad Med. 2005;80:489-495.
10. Newble DI, Hoare J, Sheldrake PF. The selection and training of examiners for clinical examinations. Med Educ. 1980;14:345-349.
11. Cook DA, Dupras DM, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Pankratz VS. Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: A randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:74-79.
12. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:270-292.
13. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Wood TJ, et al. Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference Med Teach. 2012;34:e725-e731.
14. Rubeck RF, Witzke DB. Faculty development: A field of dreams. Acad Med. 1998;73 (9 suppl):S32-S37.
15. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28:1-30.
16. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS. Consequences of individual feedback on behaviour in organizations. J Appl Psychol. 1979;64:349-371.
17. Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73:387-396.
18. Cohen PA. Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis research in higher education. Res Higher Educ. 1980;13:321-341.
19. Bing-You RG, Greenberg LW, Wiederman BL, Smith CS. A randomized multicentre trial to improve resident teaching with written feedback. Teach Learn Med. 1997;9:10-13.
20. Patterson K, Greeny J, Maxfield D, McMillan R, Switzler A. Influencer-The Power to Change Anything. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2008.
21. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Wood TJ, Lee AC. Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports. Med Educ. 2008;42:816-822.
22. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Berrett-Koehler; 1998.
23. Dudek N, Wood T. The completed clinical evaluation report rating-Validation for use with research assistants. Abstract presented at: Research in Medical Education (RIME) Conference; November 6-9, 2009; Boston, Mass.
24. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 1988.
25. Holden JD. Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7:65-70.
26. Marks MB, Wood TJ, Nuth J, Touchie C, O'Brien H, Dugan A. Assessing change in clinical teaching skills: Are we up for the challenge Teach Learn Med. 2008;20: 288-294.
27. D'Eon MF. Evaluation of a teaching workshop for residents at the University of Saskatchewan: A pilot study. Acad Med. 2004;79:791-797.
28. Pandachuck K, Harley D, Cook D. Effectiveness of a brief workshop designed to improve teaching performance at the University of Alberta. Acad Med. 2004;79:798-804.