An innovative evaluation method in an internal medicine clerkship

Academic Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 1996, Pages S76-S78

  Speer, Alice J ^a   Solomon, David J ^a   Ainsworth, Michael A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTINUING EDUCATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION;

EID: 0030028844     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199601000-00048     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Hunt, D. D., MacLnren, C. F., Scott, C. S., Chu, J., and Leiden, L. I. Characteristics of Dean's Letters in 1981 and 1982. Acad Med. 68(1993):905-911.
2. Mngarian, G. J., and Mazur, D. J. A National Survey of Grading Systems Used in Medicine Clerkships. Acad. Med. 65(1990). 636-639.
3. Magarinn, G. J., and Mazur, D. J. Evaluation of Students in Medicine Clerkships. Acad. Med. 65(1990):341-345.
4. DaRosa, D. A. Commentary. Teach. Learn. Med. 5(1993): 16-17.
5. Cohen, G. S., Biumherg, P., Ryan, N. C., and Sullivan, P. L. Do Final Grades Reflect Written Qualitative Evaluations of Student Performance? Teach. Leant. Med. 5(1993): 10-15.
6. Brennen, R. L. Elements of Generalizability Theory. Iowa City, Iowa: ACT Publications, 1983.
7. Norusis, M. J. SPS.PC-f Base System User's Guide Version 5.0. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc., 1992.