Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports

Medical Education

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 816-822

  Dudek, Nancy L ^a,d   Marks, Meridith B ^a   Wood, Timothy J ^a,c   Lee, A Curtis ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c Medical Council of Canada   (Canada)

^d Rehabilitation Center   (Canada)

Author keywords

*documentation; *education, medical, undergraduate; Clinical competence *standards; Pilot projects; Reproducibility of results; Validation studies publication type

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPLETED CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT RATING SCALE; DELPHI STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 47649133753     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03105.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Turnbull J, van Barneveld C. Assessment of clinical performance: in-training evaluation. In : Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. London : Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002 793 810.
2. Gray JD. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med 1996 71 (Suppl 55 61.
3. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Ainsworth MA. An innovative evaluation method in an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 1996 71 (Suppl 76 8.
4. Cohen GS, Blumberg P, Ryan NC, Sullivan PL. Do final grades reflect written qualitative evaluations of student performance? Teach Learn Med 1993 5 (1 10 5.
5. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 2005 80 (10 Suppl 84 7.
6. Faculty Policy and Procedures for the Evaluation of Postgraduate Students. Hamilton, ON : McMaster University.
7. Postgraduate Medical Studies Procedures for Evaluation, Promotion and Appeals. St Johns, NF : Memorial University of Newfoundland 1996.
8. Principles and Policies of In-training Evaluation Postgraduate Medical Education. Ottawa, ON : University of Ottawa 2001.
9. Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med 1999 74 (11 1203 7.
10. Battistone MJ, Pendleton B, Milne C, Battistone ML, Sande MA, Hemmer PA, Shomaker TS. Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med 2001 76 (10 [Suppl] 105 7.
11. Brennan RL. Manual for urgenova. Iowa City, IA : Iowa Testing Programs, University of Iowa 2001.
12. Durning SJ, Hanson J, Pangaro L, Jackson JJ. Using qualitative data from a programme director's evaluation form as an outcome measurement for medical school [Abstract]. Seattle, WA : RIME Conference Proceedings, Research in Medical Education (RIME) Conference, 27 October to 1 November 2006.
13. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Programs: the Four Levels, 2nd edn. San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler 1998.
14. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach 2006 28 (6 497 526.