Behavioral Testing

The Mouse in Biomedical Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 513-534

  Wahlsten, Douglas ^a   Crabbe, John C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882339329     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369454-6/50069-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (108)

1. Bagg H.J. Individual differences and family resemblances in animal behavior. Am Natural 1916, L:222-236.
2. Baker E.J., Galloway L., Jackson B., Schmoyer D., Snoddy J. MuTrack: a genome analysis system for large-scale mutagenesis in the mouse. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:11.
3. Bannerman D.M., Good M.A., Butcher S.R, Ramsay M., Morris R.G.M. Distinct components of spatial-learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade. Nature 1995, 378:182-186.
4. Benefiel A.C., Dong W.K., Greenough W.T. Mandatory quot;enriched quot; housing of laboratory animals: the need for evidence-based evaluation. ILAR 2005, 7 46:95-105.
5. Bockamp E., Maringer M, Spangenberg C., Fees S., Fraser S., Eshkind L., et al. Of mice and models: improved animal models for biomedical research. Physiol Genomics 2002, 11:115-132.
6. Bogue C.W. Genetic models in applied physiology-invited review: functional genomics in the mouse: powerful techniques for unraveling the basis of human development and disease. JAppl Physiol 2003, 94:2502-2509.
7. Branchi L, Ricceri L. Transgenic and knock-out mouse pups: the grow-ing need for behavioral analysis. Genes Brain Behav 2002, 1:135-141.
8. Buccafusco J.J. Methods of behavior analysis in neuroscience 2001, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
9. Belzung C., El Hage W., Moindrot N., Griebel G. Behavioral and neurochemical changes following predatory stress in mice. Neuropharmacology 2001, 41:400-408.
10. Cermakian N., Sassone-Corsi P. Environmental stimulus perception and control of circadian clocks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002, 12:359-365.
11. Chaudhury D., Colwell C.S. Circadian modulation of learning and memory in fear-conditioned mice. Behav Brain Res 2002, 133:95-108.
12. Chesler E.J., Lu L., Shou S.M., Qu YH., Gu J., Wang J.T., et al. Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function. Nat Genet 2005, 37:233-242.
13. Chesler E.J., Wilson S.G., Lariviere W.R., Rodriguez-Zas S.L., Mogil J.S. Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:1101-1102.
14. Corpechot C., Collins B.E., Carey M.R, Tsouros A., Robel P., Fry J.R Brain neurosteroids during the mouse oestrous cycle. Brain Res 1997, 766:276-280.
15. Crabbe J.C. A genetic animal model of alcohol withdrawal. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996, 20:96A-100A.
16. Crabbe J.C. Use of genetic analyses to refine phenotypes related to alcohol tolerance and dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001, 25:288-292.
17. Crabbe J.C., Metten P., Cameron A.J., Wahlsten D. An analysis of the genetics of alcohol intoxication in inbred mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005, 28:785-802.
18. Crabbe J.C., Morris R.G.M. Festina lente: late-night thoughts on high-throughput screening of mouse behavior. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:1175-1179.
19. Crabbe J.C., Wahlsten D., Dudek B.C. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 1999, 284:1670-1672.
20. Crawley J.N. What's wrong with my mouse? Behavioralphenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice 2000, Wiley-Liss, New York.
21. Crawley J.N., Belknap J.K., Collins A., Crabbe J.C., Frankel W, Henderson N., et al. Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies. Psychopharmacology 1997, 132:107-124.
22. Current protocols in neuroscience 2005, John Wiley amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ. J.N. Crawley, C. Gerfen, R. McKay, M. Rogawski, D. Sibley, P. Skolnick (Eds.).
23. Crawley J.N., Pay lor R. A proposed test battery and constellations of specific behavioral paradigms to investigate the behavioral phenotypes of transgenic and knockout mice. Horm Behav 1997, 27:201-210.
24. Crowcroft P. Mice all over 1973, Chicago Zoological Society, Chicago.
25. Crusio WE., Gerlai R.T. Handbook of molecular-genetic techniques for brain and behavior research 1999, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
26. Crusio WE., Schwegler H., Brust I. Covariations between hippocam-pal mossy fibres and working and reference memory in spatial and non-spatial radial maze tasks in mice. Eur J Neurosci 1993, 5:1413-1420.
27. Darbishire A.D. On the result of crossing Japanese waltzing mice and albino races. Biometrica 2004, 3:1-51.
28. Dawson G.R., Tricklebank M.D. Use of the elevated plus-maze in the search for novel anxiolytic agents. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1995, 16:33-36.
29. Dixon D.P., Ackert A.M., Eckel L.A. Development of, and recovery from, activity-based anorexia in female rats. Physiol Behav 2003, 80:273-279.
30. Drai D., Golani I. SEE: a tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001, 25:409-426.
31. Fentress J.C Emergence of pattern in the development of mammalian movement sequences. J Neurobiol 1992, 23:1529-1556.
32. Galsworthy M.J., Amrein I., Kuptsov P.A., Poletaeva I.I., Zinn P., Rau A., et al. A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms. Behav Brain Res 2005, 157:211-217.
33. Gerlai R. Ethological approaches in behavioral neurogenetic research. Handbook of molecular-genetic techniques for brain and behavior research 1999, 605-613. Elsevier, Amsterdam. W.E. Crusio, R. Gerlai (Eds.).
34. Techniques for the genetic analysis of brain and behavior: focus on the mouse 1992, Elsevier, Amsterdam. D. Goldowitz, D. Wahlsten, R.E. Wimer (Eds.).
35. Greenough W.T., Black J.E., Klintsova A., Bates K.E., Weiler I.J. Experience and plasticity in brain structure: possible implications of basic research findings for developmental disorders. The changing nervous system 1999, 51-70. Oxford University Press, New York. S.H. Broman, J.M. Fletcher (Eds.).
36. Grubb S.C., Churchill G.A., Bogue M.A. A collaborative database of inbred mouse strain characteristics. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2857-2859.
37. Hargreaves E.L., Rao G., Lee L, Knierim J.J. Major dissociation between medial and lateral entorhinal input to dorsal hippocampus. Science 2005, 308:1792-1794.
38. Hitzemann R., Reed C., Malmanger B., Lawler M., Hitzemann B., Cunningham B., et al. On the integration of alcohol-related quantita-tive trait loci ands gene expression analyses. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004, 28:1437-1448.
39. Hogg S. A review of the validity and variability of the elevated plus-maze as an animal model of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1996, 54:21-30.
40. Hossain S.M., Wong B.K.Y., Simpson E.M. The dark phase improves genetic discrimination for some high throughput mouse behavioral pheno-typing. Genes Brain Behav 2004, 3:167-177.
41. Neurobehavioral genetics: methods and applications 1999, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. B.C. Jones, P. Morme grave;de (Eds.).
42. Kafkafi N. Extending SEE for large-scale phenotyping of mouse open-field behavior. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003, 35:294-301.
43. Kafkafi N., Lipkind D., Benjamini Y, Mayo C.L., Elmer G.I., Golani I. SEE locomotor behavior test discriminates C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse inbred strains across laboratories and protocol conditions. Behav Neurosci 2003, 117:464-477.
44. Kopp C Locomotor activity rhythm in inbred strains of mice: implica-tions for behavioural studies. Behav Brain Res 2001, 125:93-96.
45. Kopp C., Vogel E., Rettori M.C., Delagrange P., Guardiola-Lemaitre B., Misslin R. Effects of a daylight cycle reversal on locomotor activity in several inbred strains of mice. Physiol Behav 1998, 63:577-585.
46. Lehner P.N. Handbook of ethological methods 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Lister R.G. The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse. Psychopharmacology 1987, 92:180-185.
48. Lorenz K. Evolution and modification of behavior 1965, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
49. Martin P., Bateson P. Measuring behavior: an introductory guide 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Matzel L.D., Han Y.R., Grossman H., Karnik M.S., Patel D., Scott N., et al. Individual differences in the expression of a quot;general quot; learning abil-ity in mice. J Neurosci 2003, 23:6423-6433.
51. Maxson S.C. Methodological issues in genetic analysis of an agonistic behavior (offense), in male mice. Techniques for the genetic analysis of brain and behavior: focus on the mouse 1992, Vol. 8:349-373. Elsevier, Amsterdam. D. Goldowitz, D. Wahlsten, R.E. Wimer (Eds.).
52. McClearn G.E. Selected uses of the mouse in behavioral research. The mouse in biomedical research. Vol. IV. Experimental biology and oncol- ogy 1982, 37-49. Academic Press, New York. H.L. Foster, J.D. Small, J.G. Fox (Eds.).
53. Mcllwain K.L., Merriweather M.Y., Yuva-Paylor L.A., Paylor R. The use of behavioral test batteries: effects of training history. Physiol Behav 2001, 73:705-717.
54. Munn N.L. Handbook of psychological research on the rat. An intro- duction to animal psychology 1950, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
55. Paigen K., Eppig J.T. A mouse phenome project. Mamm Genome 2000, 11:715-717.
56. Panda S., Antoch M.P., Miller B.H., Su A.I., Schook A.B., Straume M., et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circa-dian clock. Cell 2002, 109:307-320.
57. Pellow S., Chopin P., File S.E., Briley M. Validation of open-closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 1985, 14:149-167.
58. Petkov P.M., Ding Y.M., Cassell M.A., Zhang W.D., Wagner G., Sargent E.E., et al. An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 2004, 14:1806-1811.
59. Petters R.M., Sommer J.R. Transgenic animals as models for human disease. Transgenic Res 2000, 9:347-351.
60. Plomin R. Genetics, genes, genomics and g. Mol Psychiatr 2003, 8:1-5.
61. Rogers D.C., Fisher E.M.C., Brown S.D.M., Peters J., Hunter A.J., Martin J.E. Behavioral and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment. Mamm. Genome 1997, 8:711-713.
62. Rogers D.C., Jones D.N.C., Nelson PR., Jones C.M., Quilter C.A., Robinson T.L., Hagan J.J. Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analy-sis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains. Behav Brain Res 1999, 105:207-217.
63. Rustay N., Wahlsten D., Crabbe J.C Assessment of genetic suscep-tibility to ethanol intoxication in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:2917-2922.
64. Spearman C quot;General intelligence, quot; objectively determined and meas-ured. Am J Psychol 2004, 15:201-293.
65. Squire L.R. Mechanisms of memory. Science 1986, 232:1612-1619.
66. Stokkan K.A., Yamazaki S., Tei H., Sakaki Y, Menaker M. Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding. Science 2001, 291:490-493.
67. Tecott L.H., Nestler E.J. Neurobehavioral assessment in the informa-tion age. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:462-466.
68. Timberlake W. Niche-related learning in laboratory paradigms: the case of maze behavior in Norway rats. Behav Brain Res 2002, 134:355-374.
69. Traub R.E. Reliability for the social sciences: theory and applications 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
70. Tsai P.-P, Pachowsky U., Stelzer H.D., Hackbarth H. Impact of envi-ronmental enrichment in mice. I. Effect of housing conditions on body weight, organ weights and haematology in different strains. Lab Anim 2002, 36:411-419.
71. van de Weerd H.A., Baumans V, Koolhaas J.M., van Zutphen L.F.M. Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. J Exp Anim Sci 1994, 36:117-127.
72. van der Staay F.J., Steckler T. The fallacy of behavioral phenotyping without standardisation. Genes Brain Behav 2002, 1:9-13.
73. Vanderlip S.L. Mice: everything about history, care, nutrition, handling, and behavior 2001, Barron's Educational Series, Hauppauge, NY.
74. Vo die;ikar V, Polus A., Vasar E., Rauvala H. Long-term individual housing in C57BL/6J and DBA/2 mice: assessment of behavioral consequences. Genes Brain Behav 2005, 4:240-252.
75. Vyssotski A.L., Dell'Omo G., Poletaeva I.I., Vyssotski D.L., Minichiello L., Klein R., et al. Long-term monitoring of hippocampus-dependent behavior in naturalistic settings: Mutant mice lacking neurotrophin receptor TrkB in the forebrain show spatial learning but impaired behavioral flexibil-ity. Hippocampus 2002, 12:27-38.
76. Wahlsten D. Behavioral genetics and animal learning. Psychopharmacology of aversively motivated behaviors 1978, 63-118. Plenum, New York. H. Anisman, G. Bignami (Eds.).
77. Wahlsten D. Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recom-mendations, and reality. Physiol Behav 2001, 73:695-704.
78. Wahlsten D. Sample size requirements for experiments on laboratory animals. Neurobehavioral genetics: methods and applications 2005, in press, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed. P. Morme grave;de, B. C Jones (Eds.).
79. Wahlsten D., Cooper S.F., Crabbe J.C. Different rankings of inbred mouse strains on the Morris maze and a refined 4-arm water escape task. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, in press.
80. Wahlsten D., Metten P., Crabbe J.C. A rating scale for wildness and ease of handling laboratory mice: results for 21 inbred strains tested in two laboratories. Genes Brain Behav 2003, 2:71-79.
81. Wahlsten D., Metten P., Phillips T.J., Boehm S.L., Burkhart-Kasch S., Dorow J., et al. Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J Neurobiol 2003, 54:283-311.
82. Wahlsten D., Rustay N.R., Metten P., Crabbe J.C In search of a better mouse test. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26:132-136.
83. Wang G.H. The relation between 'spontaneous' activity and the oestrous cycle in the white rat. Comparative Psychology Monographs 1923, 2:1-27.
84. Wang H., Tranguch S., Xie H., Hanley G., Das S.K., Dey S.K. Variation in commercial rodent diets induces disparate molecular and phys-iological changes in the mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:9960-9965.
85. West D.B., Iakougova O., Olsson C., Ross D., Ohmen J., Chatterjee A. Mouse genetics/genomics: an effective approach for drug target dis-covery and validation. Med Res Rev 2000, 20:216-230.
86. The behavior of the laboratory rat 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I.Q. Whishaw, B. Kolb (Eds.).
87. Wolfer D.P., Lipp H.P. Dissecting the behaviour of transgenic mice: is it the mutation, the genetic background, or the environment?. Exp Physiol 2000, 85:627-634.
88. Wolfer D.P., Litvin O., Morf S., Nitsch R.M., Lipp H.P, Wu die;rbel H. Laboratory animal welfare: cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 2004, 432:821-822.
89. Wu die;rbel H. Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends Neurosci 2001, 24:207-211.
90. Wu die;rbel H. Behavioral phenotyping enhanced: beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes Brain Behav 2002, 1:3-8.
91. Yamada K., Ohki-Hamazaki H., Wada K. Differential effects of social isolation upon body weight, food consumption, and responsiveness to novel and social environment in bombesin receptor subtype-3 (BRS-3) deficient mice. Physiol Behav 2000, 68:555-561.
92. Behavioral neurogenetics. Brain Res Bull 2002, 57. No. 1. C. Belzung, W.E. Crusio, R.T. Gerlai (Eds.).
93. Behavioural neurogenetics. Behav Brain Res vn95 1998, No. 1. W.E. Crusio (Ed.).
94. Crusio W.E., Routtenberg A. Gene targeting and hippocampal func- tion. Hippocampus 2002, 12(No. 1).
95. Genetic model in brain and behavior research. Experientia 1989, 45. No. 9. P. Driscoll (Ed.).
96. Genes, Brain amp; Behavior. All issues from Vol. 1, No. 1 to present.
97. Molecular behavior genetics of the mouse. Physiol Behav 2001, 73. No. 5. R.T. Gerlai, W.E. Crusio (Eds.).
98. Genes and behavior. J Neurobiol 2003, 54. No. 1. O. Hobert (Ed.).
99. Mouse behavior models in biomedical research. ILAR 2000, 741. No. 3. J.G. Vandenbergh (Ed.).
100. Behavioural phenotyping of mouse mutants. Behav Brain Res 2001, 125. Nos. 1 amp; 2. F.J. van der Staay, H. Schro die;der, M. Walther, T. Steckler (Eds.).
101. Genetically defined animal models of neurobehavioral dysfunctions. Birkha die;user 1992, P. Driscoll (Ed.).
102. The mouse in animal genetics and breeding research 2005, Imperial College Press, London. E.J. Eisen (Ed.).
103. Hahn, M.E., ed. Developmental behavior genetics: neural, biometrical and evolutionary approaches. Oxford University Press, New York.
104. Behavior-genetic analysis: bench- mark papers in behavior 1982, Hutchinson Ross Publishing, Stroudsburg, PA. J. Hirsch, T.R. McGuire (Eds.).
105. Contributions to behavior-genetic analysis: the mouse as a prototype 1970, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. G. Lindzey, D.D. Thiessen (Eds.).
106. Pfaff D.W., Berrettini W.H., Joh T.H., Maxon S.C. Genetic influences on neural and behavioral functions 1999, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
107. Popko B. Mouse models in the study of genetic neurological disorders 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
108. The genetics of behaviour 1974, North-Holland, Amsterdam. J.H.F. van Abeelen (Ed.).