SEE locomotor behavior test discriminates C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse inbred strains across laboratories and protocol conditions

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 464-477

  Kafkafi, Neri ^a,b,d   Mayo, Cheryl L ^b,d   Elmer, Gregory I ^b,d   Lipkind, Dina ^c   Benjamini, Yoav ^c   Golani, Ilan ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENOTYPE; INBRED STRAIN; LABORATORY; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; GENOTYPE; LABORATORIES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0038513718     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.464     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Belknap, J. K., Hitzemann, R., Crabbe, J. C., Phillips, T. J., Buck, K. J., & Williams, R. (2001). QTL analysis and genomewide mutagenesis in mice: Complementary genetic approaches to the dissection of complex traits. Behavior Genetics, 31(1), 5-15.
2. Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, G. I., Golani, I., & Kafkafi, N. (2001). Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Research, 125, 279-284.
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289-300.
4. Benjamini, Y., & Liu, W. (1999). A step-down multiple hypothesis testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 82(1-2), 163-170.
5. Bolivar, V. J., Caldarone, B. J., Reilly, A. A., & Flaherty, L. (2000). Habituation in the open field: A survey of inbred strains and F1 hybrids. Behavior Genetics, 30, 258-293.
6. Cabib, S. (2002). The contribution of studies in inbred strains of mice to understanding of a hyperactive phenotype. Behavioural Brain Research, 130, 103-109.
7. Cabib, S., & Bonaventura, N. (1997). Parallel strain-dependent susceptibility to environmentally-induced stereotypies and stress-induced behavioral sensitization in mice. Physiology & Behavior, 61, 499-506.
8. Cleveland, W. S. (1977). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistics Association, 74, 829-836.
9. Cools, A. R., Ellenbroek, B. A., Gingras, M. A., Engbersen, A., & Heeren, D. (1997). Differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to dexamphetamine in Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: A dose-effect analysis of spatio-temporal programming of behavior. Psychopharmacology, 132, 181-187.
10. Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D., & Dudek, B. C. (1999a, June 4). Genetics of mouse behavior: Interactions with lab environment. Science, 284, 1670-1672.
11. Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D., & Dudek, B. C. (1999b). Multi-center trial of a standardized battery of tests of mouse behavior. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/psy/obssr/
12. Crawley, J. N. (2000). What's wrong with my mouse? Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice. New York: Wiley-Liss.
13. Crawley, J. N., Belknap, J. K., Collins, A., Crabbe, J. C., Frankel, W., Henderson, N., et al. (1997). Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology, 132, 107-124.
14. Drai, D., Benjamini, Y., & Golani, I. (2000). Statistical discrimination of natural modes of motion in rat exploratory behavior. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 96, 119-131.
15. Drai, D., & Golani, I. (2001). SEE: A tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 409-426.
16. Drai, D., Kafkafi, N., Benjamini, Y., Elmer, G. I., & Golani, I. (2001). Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 125, 133-140.
17. Eilam, D., & Golani, I. (1989). Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 199-211.
18. 2 agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements. Brain Research, 460, 255-267.
19. Elmer, G. I., Gorelick, D. A., Goldberg, S. R., & Rothman R. B. (1996). Acute sensitivity vs. context-specific sensitization to cocaine as a function of genotype. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 53, 623-628.
20. Flint, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C., Fulker, D. W., Gray, J. A., Miller, S., & Collins, A. C. (1995, September 8). A simple genetic basis for a complex psychological trait in laboratory mice. Science, 269, 1432-1435.
21. Gingras, M. A., & Cools, A. R. (1997). Different behavioral effects of daily or intermittent dexamphetamine administration in Nijmegen high and low responders. Psychopharmacology, 132, 188-194.
22. Golani, I., Benjamini, Y., & Eilam, D. (1993). Stopping behavior: Constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Behavioural Brain Research, 53, 21-33.
23. Gorris, L. G. M., & van Abeelen, J. H. F. (1981). Behavioral effect of (-)naloxone in mice from four inbred strains. Psychopharmacology, 74, 355-359.
24. Hatcher, J. P., Jones, D. N. C., Rogers, D. C., Hatcher, P. D., Reavill, C., Hagan, J. J., & Hunter, A. J. (2001) Development of SHIRPA to characterize the phenotype of gene-targeted mice. Behavioural Brain Research, 125, 43-47.
25. Hen, I., Sakov, A., Kafkafi, N., Golani, I., & Benjamini, Y. (2003). The dynamics of spatial behavior: How can robust smoothing techniques help? Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Jones, B. C., Reed, C. L., Radcliffe, R. A., & Erwein, G. (1993). Pharmacogenetics of cocaine: I. Locomotor activity and self-selection. Pharmacogenetics, 3, 182-188.
27. Kafkafi, N. (in press). Extending SEE for large-scale phenotyping of mouse open-field behavior. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers.
28. Kafkafi, N., Mayo, C. L., Drai, D., Golani, D., & Elmer, G. I. (2001). Natural segmentation of the locomotor behavior of drug-induced rats in a photobeam cage. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 109, 111-121.
29. Kafkafi, N., Pagis, M., Lipkind, D., Mayo, C. L., Benjamini, Y., Elmer, G. I., & Golani, D. (in press). Darting behavior: A quantitative movement pattern for discrimination and replicability in mouse locomotor behavior. Behavioural Brain Research.
30. Logue, S. F., Owen, E. H., Rasmussen, D. L., & Wehner, J. M. (1997). Assessment of locomotor activity, acoustic and tactile startle, and prepulse inhibition of startle in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: Implications of genetic background for single gene and quantitative trait loci analyses. Neuroscience, 80, 1075-1086.
31. Nolan, P. M., Peters, J., Strivens, M., Rogers, D., Hagan, J., Spurr, N., et al. (2000). A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nature Genetics, 25, 440-443.
32. Paigen, K., & Eppig, J. T. (2000). A mouse phenome project. Mammalian Genome, 11, 715-717.
33. Paulus, M. P., & Geyer, M. A. (1993). Three independent factors characterize spontaneous rat motor activity. Behavioural Brain Research, 53, 11-20.
34. Rocha, B. A., Odom, L. A., Barron, B. A., Ator, R., Wild, S. A., & Forster, M. J. (1998). Differential responsiveness to cocaine in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology, 138, 82-88.
35. Rogers, D. C., Jones, D. N., Nelson, P. R., Jones, C. M., Quilter, C. A., Robinson, T. L., & Hagan, J. J. (1999). Use of SHIRPA and discriminant analysis to characterise marked differences in the behavioural phenotype of six inbred mouse strains. Behavioural Brain Research, 105, 207-217.
36. Spink, A. J., Tegelenbosch, R. A. J., Buma, M. O. S., & Noldus, L. P. J. J. (2001). The EthoVision video tracking system - a tool for behavioral phenotyping of transgenic mice. Physiology & Behavior, 73, 731-734.
37. Szechtman, H., Culver, K., & Eilam, D. (1999). Role of dopamine systems in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): Implications from a novel psychostimulant-induced animal model. Polish Journal of Pharmacology, 51, 55-61.
38. Takahashi, J. S., Pinto, L. H., & Vitaterna, M. H. (1994, June 17). Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse. Science, 264, 1724-1733.
39. Tchernichovski, O., Benjamini, Y., & Golani, I. (1996). Constraints and the emergence of freedom in the ontogeny of rat exploratory behavior. Behaviour, 133, 519-539.
40. Tchernichovski, O., Benjamini, Y., & Golani, I. (1998). The dynamics of long term exploratory behavior in the rat, Part I. Biological Cybernetics, 78, 423-432.
41. Tchernichovski, O., & Golani, I. (1995). A phase plane representation of rat exploratory behavior. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 62, 21-27.
42. Tirelli, E., & Witkin, J. M. (1994). Verticalization of behavior elicited by dopaminergic mobilization is qualitatively different between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology, 116, 191-200.
43. Tolliver, B. K., & Carney, J. M. (1995). Locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and novel cocaine analogs in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J inbred mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 50, 163-169.
44. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Turri, M. G., Talbot, C. J., Radcliffe, R. A., Wehner, J. M., & Flint, J. (1999). High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci for emotionality in selected strains of mice. Mammalian Genome, 11, 1098-1101.
46. van der Staay, F. J., & Steckler, T. (2002). The fallacy of behavioral phenotyping without standardization. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 1, 9-13.
47. Wahlsten, D. (2001). Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations and realty. Physiology & Behavior, 73, 695-704.
48. Wahlsten, D., Crabbe, J. C., & Dudek, B. C. (2001). Behavioral testing of standard inbred and 5HT1B knockout mice: Implications of absent corpus callosum. Behavioural Brain Research, 125, 23-32.
49. Wallace, D. G., Hines, D. J., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2002). Quantification of a single exploratory trip reveals hippocampal formation mediated dead reckoning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 30, 131-145.
50. Whishaw, I. Q., Cassel, J. C., Majchrzak, M., Cassel, S., & Will, B. (1994). "Short-stops" in rats with fimbria-fornix lesions: Evidence for change in the mobility gradient. Hippocampus, 4, 577-582.
51. Whishaw, I. Q., Hines, D. J., & Wallace, D. G. (2001). Dead reckoning (path integration) requires the hippocampal formation: Evidence from spontaneous exploration and spatial learning tasks in light (allothetic) and dark (idiothetic) tests. Behavioural Brain Research, 127, 49-69.
52. Womer, D. E., Jones, B. C., & Erwin, V. G. (1994). Characterization of dopamine transporter and locomotor effects of cocaine, GBR 12909, epidepride, and SCH 23390 in C57BL and DBA mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 48, 327-335.
53. Wurbel, H. (2000) Behaviour and the standardization fallacy. Nature Genetics, 26, 263.
54. Wurbel, H. (2002). Behavioral phenotyping enhanced - beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 1, 3-8.