Effects of complementary auditory feedback in robot-assisted lower extremity motor adaptation

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 775-786

  Zanotto, Damiano ^a   Rosati, Giulio ^b   Spagnol, Simone ^b   Stegall, Paul ^c   Agrawal, Sunil K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Motor adaptation; Multimodal feedback; Rehabilitation robotics; Rhythmic auditory stimulation

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUDITORY STIMULATION; MOTOR ADAPTATION; MULTIMODAL FEEDBACK; REHABILITATION ROBOTICS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ROBOTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

KINETICS;

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; GAIT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KINESIOTHERAPY; LEG; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GAIT; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROBOTICS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881546893     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2242902     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. V. L. Roger et al., "Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update," Circulation, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. e18-e209, Feb. 2011.
2. B. French et al., "Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), no. 4, 2007.
3. J. Carr et al., Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to OptimizeMotor Skill. London, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008.
4. G. Kwakkel et al., "Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial," Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9174, pp. 191-196, Jul. 1999. (Pubitemid 29329157)
5. R. P. Van Peppen et al., "The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence?," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 833-862, Dec. 2004. (Pubitemid 39642264)
6. S. C. Cramer et al., "Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke," Curr. Opinion Neurol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 76-82, Feb. 2008.
7. R. Riener et al., "Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: An overview of the robotic gait orthosis Lokomat," J. Healthcare Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 197-216, 2010.
8. G. Rosati, "The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation," Expert Rev. Medical Devices, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 753-758, 2010.
9. S. Hesse et al., "Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 401-410, 1999. (Pubitemid 29425635)
10. G. Colombo et al., "Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 693-700, 2000.
11. S. Hesse et al., "Connecting research to the needs of patients and clinicians," Brain Res. Bull., vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 26-34, Jan. 2009.
12. H. Schmidt et al., "HapticWalker-A novel haptic foot device," ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 166-180, 2005.
13. G. R.West, "Powered gait orthosis and method of utilizing same," U.S. Patent 7 041 069, May 2006.
14. M. Bouri et al., "The WalkTrainer: A robotic system for walking rehabilitation," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Biomimetics ROBIO '06, 2006, pp. 1616-1621.
15. J. F. Veneman et al., "Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 379-386, May 2007. (Pubitemid 47460425)
16. D. Aoyagi et al., "Arobot and control algorithmthat can synchronously assist in naturalisticmotion during body-weight-supported gait training following neurologic injury," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 387-400, May 2007. (Pubitemid 47460412)
17. S. K. Banala et al., "Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX)," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2-8, 2009.
18. K. N. Winfree et al., "Design of a minimally constraining, passively supported gait training exoskeleton: ALEX II," in Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robotics (ICORR), 2011, pp. 1-6.
19. J. Mehrholz et al., "Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke," Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., vol. 4, no. 9, 2010.
20. V. S. Huang et al., "Robotic neurorehabilitation: A computational motor learning perspective," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 6, p. 5, Jan. 2009.
21. J. Hidler et al., "Role of robotics in neurorehabilitation," Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 42-49, 2011.
22. W. Powell et al., "Sounding better: Fast audio cues increase walk speed in treadmill-mediated virtual rehabilitation environments," Stud. in Health Technol. Informatics, vol. 154, pp. 202-207, Jan. 2010.
23. A. Mirelman et al., "Virtual reality for gait training: Can it inducemotor learning to enhance complex walking and reduce fall risk in patients with Parkinson's disease?," J. Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 234-240, Feb. 2011.
24. M.Wellner et al., "A study on sound feedback in a virtual environment for gait rehabilitation," Virtual Rehabilitation, pp. 53-56, 2007.
25. A. Mirelman et al., "Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke," Stroke; Amer. J. Cerebral Circulation, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 169-174, Jan. 2009.
26. T. Koritnik et al., "Comparison of visual and haptic feedback during training of lower extremities," Gait Posture, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 540-546, Oct. 2010.
27. A. Koenig et al., "Controlling patient participation during robot-assisted gait training," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14, Jan. 2011.
28. C. D. Batson et al., "Gait training improves performance in healthy adults exposed to novel sensory discordant conditions," Exper. Brain Res., vol. 209, no. 4, pp. 515-524, Apr. 2011.
29. M. Thaut et al., "Rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation of movement disorders: A review of current research," Music Perception, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 263-269, 2010.
30. M. Roerdink et al., "Walking to the beat of different drums: Practical implications for the use of acoustic rhythms in gait rehabilitation," Gait Posture, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 690-694, Apr. 2011.
31. M. Schauer et al., "Musical motor feedback (MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: Randomized trials of gait improvement," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 713-722, Oct. 2003. (Pubitemid 37369101)
32. M. Suteerawattananon et al., "Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait in individuals with Parkinson's disease," J. Neurological Sci., vol. 219, no. 1-2, pp. 63-69, Apr. 2004. (Pubitemid 38405999)
33. I. Lim et al., "Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 695-713, Oct. 2005. (Pubitemid 41489524)
34. M. H. Thaut et al., "Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: A single-blind, randomized trial," Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 455-459, 2007. (Pubitemid 47246432)
35. M. Roerdink et al., "Rhythm perturbations in acoustically paced treadmill walking after stroke," Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 668-678, Sep. 2009.
36. J. Wittwer et al., "Rhythmic auditory cueing to improve walking in patients with neurological conditions other than Parkinson's disease- What is the evidence?," Disability Rehabil., pp. 1-13, 2012.
37. J. A. Taylor et al., "Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control," J. Neurophysiol., p. 10, Apr. 2007.
38. M. Rath et al., "Continuous sonic feedback from a rolling ball," IEEE Multimedia, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 60-69, Apr.-Jun. 2005. (Pubitemid 40784317)
39. D. J. Reinkensmeyer et al., "Some key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: A perspective from the University of California at Irvine," in Proc. IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Rehab. Robotics (ICORR ), 2007, pp. 1009-1015.
40. F. Avanzini et al., "Integrating auditory feedback in motor rehabilitation systems," in Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces for Skills Transfer, 2009.
41. R. Secoli et al., "Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot-assisted movement training after stroke," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 21, Jan. 2011.
42. F. Oscari et al., "Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching," Exper. Brain Res., vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 33-41, 2012.
43. G. Rosati et al., "Effect of task-related continuous auditory feedback during learning of tracking motion exercises," J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., vol. 9, no. 79, Oct. 2012.
44. S. H. Kim et al., "Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals," Experimental Brain Res., vol. 202, no. 4, pp. 809-824, May 2010.
45. S. Banala et al., "A powered leg orthosis for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients," in Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy, Apr. 2007, pp. 10-14.
46. S. K. Banala et al., "Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX)," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., submitted for publication.
47. P. Stegall et al., "Rehabilitation exoskeleton design: Exploring the effect of the anterior lunge degree-of-freedom," IEEE Trans. Robot., to be published.
48. H. Sadeghi et al., "Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: A review," Gait Posture, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34-45, Sep. 2000.
49. P. Cook, Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters, 2002.
50. M. Kleiman-Weiner et al., "The sound of one arm swinging: A model for multidimensional auditory display of physical motion," in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Auditory Display, ICAD2006, 2006, pp. 278-280.
51. G. E. Peterson et al., "Control methods used in a study of the vowels," J. Acoustical Soc. Amer., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 175-184, 1952.
52. E. T. Hsiao-Wecksler et al., "A review of new analytic techniques for quantifying symmetry in locomotion," Symmetry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1135-1155, Jun. 2010.
53. K. K. Patterson et al., "Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization," Gait Posture, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 241-246, Feb. 2010.
54. Y. Hochberg et al., Multiple Comparison Procedures, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2008.
55. J. H. Zar, Biostatistical Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 2007.
56. D. A. Winter, The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal, Elderly and Pathological. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Univ. Waterloo, 1991.
57. T. Ifukube et al., "A blind mobility aid modeled after echolocation of bats," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 461-465, May 1991.
58. P. B. Meijer, "An experimental system for auditory image representations," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 112-121, Feb. 1992.
59. K. A. Kaczmarek et al., "Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 1991.
60. M. Ohuchi et al., "Cognitive-map formation of blind persons in a virtual sound environment," in Proc. Int. Conf. Auditory Display (ICAD'06), London, U.K., Jun. 2006, pp. 1-7.
61. S. Masiero et al., "Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial," J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 355-366, 2011.
62. M. Thaut et al., "The connection between rhythmicity and brain function," IEEE Eng. Medicine and Biology Mag., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 101-108, 1999. (Pubitemid 29159313)
63. M. Thaut et al., "Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients," Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1073-1081, 2002. (Pubitemid 34233645)
64. M. Hove et al., "Interactive rhythmic auditory stimulation reinstates natural structure in gait of Parkinson's patients," in Proc. COGSCI, 2010, pp. 2727-2732.
65. M.Wellner et al., "Evaluation of visual and auditory feedback in virtual obstacle walking," Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., vol. 17, pp. 512-524, Oct. 2008.
66. G. Yogev-Seligmann et al., "The role of executive function and attention in gait,"Movement Disorders: Official J. Movement Disorder Soc., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 329-342, Feb. 2008.
67. A. Presacco et al., "Neural decoding of treadmill walking from noninvasive electroencephalographic signals," J. Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1875-87, Oct. 2011.
68. C. Eccleston et al., "Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain," Psychol. Bull., vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 356-66, May 1999.
69. A. Gabell et al., "The effect of age on variability in gait," J. Gerontol., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 662-666, 1984. (Pubitemid 15180611)
70. J. W. Noble et al., "Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking," Exper. Brain Res., vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 482-495, Mar. 2006.
71. E. H. F. van Asseldonk et al., "The effects on kinematics and muscle activity of walking in a robotic gait trainer during zero-force control," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., submitted for publication.
72. J.-S. Kim et al., "Visual and kinesthetic locomotor imagery training integrated with auditory step rhythm for walking performance of patients with chronic stroke," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 134-145, Mar. 2011.