Some key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: A perspective from the University of California at Irvine

2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1009-1015

  Reinkensmeyer, David J ^a,b   Galvez, Jose A ^b   Marchai, Laura ^b   Wolbrecht, Eric T ^b   Bobrow, James E ^b  

^a IEEE

^b University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; EDUCATION; MOTORS; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; PATIENT REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS;

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; KEY PROBLEMS; MOTOR LEARNING; MOVEMENT THERAPY; REHABILITATION ROBOTICS; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;

ROBOTS;

EID: 48349097672     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428547     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. M. L. Aisen, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowell, and B. Volpe, "The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke,"Arch. Neurol., vol. 54, pp. 443-446, 1997.
2. G. B. Prange, M. J. A. Jannink, C. G. M. Groothuis, H. J. Hermens, and M. J. IJzerman, "Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke," J. Rehabil. Res. Develop, vol. 43, pp. 171-184, 2006.
3. C. Werner, S. Von Frankenberg, T. Treig, M. Konrad, and S. Hesse, "Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study," Stroke, vol. 33, pp. 2895-901, 2002.
4. T. Hornby, "Clinical and quantitative evaluation of robotic-assisted treadmill walking to retrain ambulation after spinal cord injury," Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, vol. 11, pp. 1-17, 2005.
5. L. Kahn, P. Lum, W. Rymer, and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does?," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 43 pp. 619-630 2006.
6. L. E. Kahn, M. L. Zygman, W. Z. Rymer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot. study," Journal of Neuroengineering and Neurorehabilitation, vol. 3:12, 2006.
7. D. Reinkensmeyer, J. Emken, and S. Cramer, "Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery," Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 497-525, 2004.
8. S. Hesse, C. Werner, M. Pohl, S. Rueckriem, J. Mehrholz, and M. L. Lingnau, "Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers," Stroke, vol. 36, pp. 1960-6. Epub 2005 Aug 18., 2005.
9. R. J. Nudo, B. M. Wise, F. SiFuentes, and G. W. Milliken, "Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct," Science, vol. 272, pp. 1791-1794, 1996.
10. J. Liepert, H. Bauder, H. R. Wolfgang, W. H. Miltner, E. Taub, and C. Weiller. "Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans," Stroke, vol. 31, pp. 1210-6, 2000.
11. V. R. Edgerton, R. D. Leon, S. J. Harkema, J. A. Hodgson, N. London, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, R. R. Roy, R. J. Talmadge, N. J. Tillakaratne, W. Timoszyk, and A. Tobin, "Retraining the injured spinal cord," J Physiol, vol. 533, pp. 15-22., 2001.
12. R. Shadmehr and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task," Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 14, pp. 3208-3224, 1994.
13. K. A. Thoroughman and R. Shadmehr, "Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.," Nature, vol. 407, pp. 742-7, 2000.
14. R. A. Scheidt, J. B. Dingwell, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Learning to move amid uncertainty," Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 86, pp. 971-85, 2001.
15. J. Emken and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Robot-enhanced motor learning: Accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 99, pp. 1-7, 2005.
16. R. A. Schmidt, Motor Control and Learning: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1988.
17. J. L. Patton, M. E. Phillips-Stoykov, M. Stojakovich, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 168, pp. 368 - 383, 2005.
18. C. J. Winstein, P. S. Pohl, and R. Lewthwaite, "Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis," Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, vol. 65, pp. 316-32, 1994.
19. D. Feygin, M. Keehner, and F. Tendick, "Haptic Guidance: Experimental Evaluation of a Haptic Training Method for a Perceptual Motor Skill," Proc. 10th Int. Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (Haptics 2002), Orlando, FL, pp. 40-47, 2002.
20. J. Liu, S. C. Cramer, and R. D.J., "Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: Comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration," Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol.31 pp. 20, 2006.
21. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, J. L. Emken, J. Liu, and J. E. Bobrow, "The nervous system appears to minimize a weighted sum of kinematic error, force, and change in force when adapting to viscous environments during reaching and stepping," presented at Advances in Computational Motor Control III Symp., pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.bme.jhu.edu/acmc/. 2004.
22. J. Emken, R. Benitez, and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed," Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. to appear, 2007.
23. D. Reinkensmeyer, D. Aoyagi, J. Emken, J. Galvez, W. Ichinose, G. Kerdanyan, S. Maneekobkunwong, K. Minakata, J. Nessler, W. Timoszyk, K. Vallance, R. Weber, J. Wynne, R. Roy, R. d. Leon, J. Bobrow, S. Harkema, and V. Edgerton, "Tools for Understanding and Optimizing Robotic Gait Training," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. In Press, 2006.
24. R. Sanchez, J. Liu, S. Rao, P. Shah, R. Smith, S. Cramer, J. Bobrow, and D. Reinkensmeyer, "Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment," IEEE Transactions on Neural and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14 pp. 378-389, 2006.
25. T. Rahman, W. Sample, R. Seliktar, M. Alexander, and M. Scavina, "A body-powered functional upper limb orthosis," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 37, pp. 675-80, 2000.
26. S. K. Agrawal and A. Fattah, "Theory and design of an orthotic device for full or partial gravity-balancing of a human leg during motion," IEEE Trans Neural Sys & Rehab Eng, vol. 12, pp. 157-165, 2004.
27. G. Colombo, M. Joerg, R. Schreier, and V. Dietz, "Treadmill training of paraplegic patients with a robotic orthosis," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 37, pp. 693-700, 2000.
28. R. Riener, L. Lunenburger, S. Jezemik, M. Anderschitz, G. Colombo, and V. Dietz, "Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results," IEEE Trans Neural Sys á Rehab Eng, vol. 13, pp. 380-394, 2005.
29. J. A. Galvez, G. Kerdanyan, S. Maneekobkunwong, R. Weber, M. Scott, S. J. Harkema, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Measuring human trainers' skill for the design of better robot control algorithms for gait training after spinal cord injury," Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 231-234, 2005.
30. J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, "On the Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators," The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 6, pp. 49, 1987.
31. R. Sanchez, E. Wolbrecht, R. Smith, J. Liu, S. Rao, S. Cramer, T. Rahman, J. Bobrow, and D. Reinkensmeyer, "A pneumatic robot for retraining arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design," Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, Chicago, Illinois, vol. 500-504, 2005.
32. E. Burdet, R. Osu, D. W. Franklin, T. E. Milner, and M. Kawato, "The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance," Nature, vol.414, pp.446-9., 2001.
33. D. Aoyagi, W. E. Ichinose, S. J. Harkema, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and J. E. Bobrow, "An assistive robotic device that can synchronize to the pelvic motion during human gait training," Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 565-568, 2005.