The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 753-758

  Rosati, Giulio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

activities of daily living; rehabilitation; robotics; stroke

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DAILY LIVES; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELDERLY PEOPLE; MOTOR DEFICITS; POPULATION AGING; POST-STROKE REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH FIELDS; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; STATE OF THE ART; STROKE; STROKE PATIENTS;

HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; ROBOTS;

ROBOTICS;

AGING; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HOME REHABILITATION; INDEPENDENCE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROGNOSIS; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS;

HUMANS; PARALYSIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; ROBOTICS; STROKE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 78149374023     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erd.10.49     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Harwin WS, Patton JL, Edgerton VR. Challenges and opportunities for robotmediated neurorehabilitation. Proc. IEEE 94(9), 1717-1726 (2006).
2. Timmermans AA, Seelen AMH, Willmann RD, Kingma H. Technologyassisted training of arm - hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 6, 1 (2009).
3. Masiero S, Carraro E, Ferraro C, Gallina P, Rossi A, Rosati G. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy. J. Rehabil. Med. 41(12), 981-985 (2009).
4. Nudo RJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke 38(2), 840-845 (2007).
5. Richards L, Hanson C, Wellborn M, Sethi A. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 15(5), 397-411 (2008).
6. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2008. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2008).
7. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119, E21-E181 (2009).
8. Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke 27, 1459-1466 (1996).
9. Kolominsky-Rabas P, Heuschmann PU, Marschall D et al. Lifetime cost of ischemic stroke in Germany: results and national projections from a populationbased stroke registry. Stroke 37, 1179-1183 (2006).
10. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur. J. Neurol. 13(6), 581-598 (2006).
11. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Reith J, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke 27, 1765-1769 (1996).
12. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke Rehabilitation - Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill. PA, USA, Butterworth-Heinemann Inc, PA, USA (2003).
13. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD000197 (2007).
14. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet. Neurol. 8, 741-754 (2009).
15. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe BT, Krebs HI. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 24(1), 62-69 (2010).
16. Rosati G, Gallina P, Masiero S. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15(4), 560-569 (2007).
17. van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil. Rehabil. 28, 831-840 (2006).
18. Butter M, Rensma A, van Boxsel J et al. Robotics for Healthcare: Final Report. European Commission - Directorate- General for Information Society and Media, October (2008).
19. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43(2), 171-184 (2006).
20. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD006876 (2008).
21. Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4 (2007).
22. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapistversus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 39, 1786-1792 (2008).
23. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23(1), 5-13 (2009).
24. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Functional recovery after stroke: a review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 1, 75-80 (2006).
25. Rosati G, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Compliant control of post-stroke rehabilitation robots: using movementspecific models to improve controller performance. Proceedings of: The ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE 2008. Boston, MA, USA, October 31-November 6 (2008).
26. Johnson MJ. Recent trends in robotassisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 3, 29 (2006).
27. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16(3), 286-297 (2008).
28. Huang VS, Krakauer JW. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 6, 5 (2009).
29. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Galvez JA, Marchal L, Wolbrecht ET, Bobrow JE. Some key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: a perspective from the University of California. Proceedings of: The IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR2007. Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 13-15 June, 1009-1015 (2007).
30. Krebs HI, Volpe B, Hogan N. A working model of stroke recovery from rehabilitation robotics practitioners. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 6, 6 (2009).
31. Secoli R, Rosati G, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Using sound feedback to counteract visual distractor during robot-assisted movement training. Presented at: The IEEE 8th International Workshop on Haptic Audio- Visual Environments and Games HAVE2009. Lecco, Italy, November 7-8 (2009).
32. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care, Mow more Than Ever. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2008).
33. Ward D, Drahota A, Gal D, Severs M, Dean TP. Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4, CD003164 (2008).
34. Outpatient Service Trialists. Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD002925 (2003).
35. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 22, 111-121 (2007).
36. Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C. Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke: the management of disappointment. Soc. Sci. Med. 59(6), 1263-1273 (2004).
37. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP et al. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J. Neuroengineering Rehab. 1(1), 5 (2004).