Association between district and state policies and us public elementary school competitive food and beverage environments

JAMA Pediatrics

Volumn 167, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 714-722

  Chriqui, Jamie F ^a   Turner, Lindsey ^a   Taber, Daniel R ^a   Chaloupka, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; MILK FAT; SODIUM;

ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; CALORIC INTAKE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EATING HABIT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAT CONTENT; FOOD; FOOD AVAILABILITY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; ICE CREAM; LIPID DIET; LOW FAT DIET; OBESITY; POLICY; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES;

BEVERAGES; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FOOD DISPENSERS, AUTOMATIC; FOOD SERVICES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; SCHOOLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84881518819     PISSN: 21686203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.32     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):483-490.
2. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010. 7th ed.Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture and US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2010.
3. Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll KM, Ogden CL. Consumption of added sugar amongU.S. children and adolescents, 2005-2008. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ databriefs/db87.htm. Accessed March 16, 2012.
4. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J AmDiet Assoc. 2010;110(10):1477-1484.
5. Briefel RR, Wilson A, Gleason PM. Consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages at school, home, and other locations among school lunch participants and nonparticipants. J AmDiet Assoc. 2009;109(suppl 90): S79-S90.
6. Turner LR, Chaloupka FJ. Student access to competitive foods in elementary schools: Trends over time and regional differences. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(2):164-169.
7. Turner L, Chaloupka FJ. Encouraging trends in student access to competitive beverages in US public elementary schools, 2006-2007 to 2010-2011. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(7):673-675.
8. Appendix B to Part 210-Categories of Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value. 2009. 7 CFR §210, Appendix B.
9. Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Pub L 111-296. 2010.
10. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2006. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2006/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
11. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2007. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2007/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
12. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2008. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2008/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
13. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2009. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2009/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
14. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2010. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2010/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
15. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2011. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2011/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
16. F as in FAT: How Obesity Policies are Failing America, 2012. http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2012/. Accessed September 21, 2012.
17. Chriqui JF, Schneider L, Chaloupka FJ, et al. School District Wellness Policies: Evaluating Progress and Potential for Improving Children's Health Three Years after the Federal Mandate. School Years 2006-07, 2007-08and 2008-09.Vol 2. http://www.bridgingthegapresearch. org/research/district- wellness-policies/.Accessed August 16, 2010.
18. Hirschman J, Chriqui JF. School food and nutrition policy, monitoring and evaluation in the USA. Public Health Nutr. 2012;1-7.
19. Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004. Pub L 108-265. 2004.
20. Schneider LM, Schermbeck RM, Chriqui JF, Chaloupka FJ. The extent towhich school district competitive food and beverage policies alignwith the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: Implications for federal regulations.J AcadNutr Diet. 2012;112(6): 892-896.
21. KubikMY,Wall M, Shen L, et al. State but not district nutrition policies are associatedwith less junk food in vending machines and school stores in US public schools.JAmDietAssoc. 2010;110(7): 1043-1048.
22. LongMW, Henderson KE, Schwartz MB. Evaluating the impact of a Connecticut program to reduce availability of unhealthy competitive food in schools. J Sch Health. 2010;80(10):478-486.
23. Woodward-Lopez G, GoslinerW, Samuels SE, Craypo L, Kao J, Crawford PB. Lessons learned from evaluations of California's statewide school nutrition standards. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2137-2145.
24. Phillips MM, Raczynski JM,West DS et al Changes in school environments with implementation of Arkansas Act 1220 of 2003. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(suppl 61): S54-S61.
25. Samuels SE, Bullock SL,Woodward-Lopez G, et al. To what extent have high schools in California been able to implement state-mandated nutrition standards? J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(3)(suppl): S38-S44.
26. Samuels SE, Hutchinson KS, Craypo L, Barry J, Bullock SL. Implementation of California state school competitive food and beverage standards. J Sch Health. 2010;80(12):581-587.
27. Taber DR, Stevens J, Evenson KR, et al. State policies targeting junk food in schools: Racial/ethnic differences in the effect of policy change on soda consumption. AmJ Public Health. 2011;101(9):1769-1775.
28. Cullen KW,Watson KB. The impact of the Texas public school nutrition policy on student food selection and sales in Texas. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(4):706-712.
29. Cullen KW,Watson K, Zakeri I, Ralston K. Exploring changes in middle-school student lunch consumption after local school food service policy modifications. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):814-820.
30. Cullen KW,Watson KB, Fithian AR. The impact of school socioeconomic status on student lunch consumption after implementation of the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy. J Sch Health. 2009;79(11):525-531.
31. Cullen KW,Watson K, Zakeri I. Improvements in middle school student dietary intake after implementation of the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(1):111-117.
32. Neumark-Sztainer D, French SA, Hannan PJ, StoryM, Fulkerson JA. School lunch and snacking patterns among high school students: Associations with school food environment and policies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2(1):14.
33. Taber DR, Chriqui JF, Chaloupka FJ. Differences in nutrient intake associatedwith state laws regarding fat, sugar, and caloric content of competitive foods. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(5):452-458.
34. Phillips MM, Raczynski JM,West DS, et al. Changes in school environments with implementation of Arkansas Act 1220 of 2003. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(Suppl 1):S54-S61.
35. Whatley Blum JE, Beaudoin CM, O'Brien LM, Polacsek M, Harris DE, O'Rourke KA. Impact of Maine's statewide nutrition policy on high school food environments. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(1):A19.
36. Cradock AL, McHugh A, Mont-Ferguson H, et al. Effect of school district policy change on consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among high school students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(4):A74.
37. Johnson DB, Bruemmer B, Lund AE, Evens CC, Mar CM. Impact of school district sugar-sweetened beverage policies on student beverage exposure and consumption inmiddle schools. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(3)(suppl):S30-S37.
38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Effects of switching from whole to low-fat/fat-freemilk in public schools-New York City, 2004-2009.MMWRMorb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(3):70-73.
39. Institute of Medicine. Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
40. Institute of Medicine. Progress in Preventing Childhood Obesity.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
41. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2009.
42. Chriqui JF, Schneider L, Chaloupka FJ, Ide K, PugachO. Local Wellness Policies: Assessing School District Strategies for Improving Children's Health. http://www.bridgingthegapresearch.org/research/district-wellness-policies/. Accessed August 1, 2009.
43. National Conference of State Legislatures. Childhood Obesity Update of Legislative Policy Options. http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/ childhood-obesity-2010.aspx. Accessed April 15, 2011.
44. National Association of State Boards of Education. State School Health Policy Database. http://nasbe.org/healthy-schools/hs/index.php. AccessedMay 29, 2010.
45. National Cancer Institute. Classification of Laws about School Students. http://class.cancer.gov/download.aspx. Accessed March 19, 2012.
46. Schwartz MB, Lund AE, Grow HM, et al. A comprehensive coding system to measure the quality of school wellness policies. J AmDiet Assoc. 2009;109(7):1256-1262.
47. Maternal and Child Health Bureau. National Survey of Children's Health. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/slaits/nsch.htm. Accessed March 19, 2012.
48. STATA/SE [software for Windows]. Version 12.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2012.
49. Story M, Kaphingst KM, French S. The role of schools in obesity prevention. Future Child. 2006;16(1):109-142.
50. Story M, NanneyMS, Schwartz MB. Schools and obesity prevention: Creating school environments and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity. MilbankQ. 2009;87(1):71-100.
51. Turner L, Chaloupka FJ, SandovalA. School Policies and Practices to Improve Health and Prevent Obesity: National Elementary School Survey Results: School Years 2006-07 through 2009-10.www .bridgingthegapresearch.org.Accessed March 1, 2012.
52. Turner L, Chaloupka FJ. Slowprogress in changing the school food environment: Nationally representative results from public and private elementary schools.JAcad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(9):1380-1389.
53. Cullen KW, Thompson DI. Texas school food policy changes related tomiddle school a la carte/snack bar foods: Potential savings in kilocalories.JAm Diet Assoc. 2005;105(12):1952-1954.
54. Mendoza JA,Watson K, Cullen KW. Change in dietary energy density after implementation of the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy. J AmDiet Assoc. 2010;110(3):434-440.
55. Taber DR, Chriqui JF, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ. Banning all sugar-sweetened beverages inmiddle schools: Reduction of in-school access and purchasing but not overall consumption. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(3):256-262.
56. Johnston LD,O'Malley PM, Terry-McElrath YM, Freedman-Doan P, Brenner JS. Bridging the Gap: Complete Descriptive Statistics on Secondary Schools, School Years 2006-07 through 2009-10. Bridging the Gap ProgramVol 2. Ann Arbor,MI: Bridging the Gap, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research; 2012.
57. Terry-McElrath YM, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM. Trends in competitive venue beverage availability: Findings from US secondary schools. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(8):776-778.
58. Institute of Medicine Committee on Nutrition Standards for Foods in Schools. Nutrition Standards for Food in Schools: Leading theWay Toward Healthier Youth.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
59. Finkelstein DM, Hill EL, Whitaker RC. School food environments and policies in US public schools. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e251-e259.
60. Institute of Medicine Committee on Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake. Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2010.