Exploring changes in middle-school student lunch consumption after local school food service policy modifications

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 814-820

  Cullen, Karen Weber ^a   Watson, Kathy ^a   Zakeri, Issa ^a   Ralston, Katherine ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive foods; Dietrary behaviour; Middle school; National School Lunch Program; Policy change; Snack bar; Vending

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; RETINOL; SATURATED FATTY ACID; SODIUM;

ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; CATERING SERVICE; FOOD INTAKE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MILK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADOLESCENT; CALORIC INTAKE; CARBONATED BEVERAGE; CHILD; DIET; FAT INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD PREFERENCE; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCHOOL; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; CARBONATED BEVERAGES; CHILD; DIET; DIET RECORDS; DIETARY FATS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD DISPENSERS, AUTOMATIC; FOOD PREFERENCES; FOOD SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; NUTRITION POLICY; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; TEXAS;

EID: 33846807385     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005878     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Devaney B, Gordon A, Burghardt J. The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study: Dietary Intakes of Program Participants and Nonparticipants. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research Inc., 1993.
2. Gordon AR, Devaney BL, Burghardt JA. Dietary effects of the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1995; 61: 221S-31S.
3. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004; 291: 2847-50.
4. US General Accounting Office (GAO). Competitive Foods are Available in Many Schools; Actions Taken to Restrict Them Differ by State and Locality. Report GAO-04-673. Washington, DC: GAO, 2004.
5. Bandura A. Social Foundations for Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1986.
6. Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor GL, Davis M, Story M, Gray C, et al. A randomized school trial of environmental strategies to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption among children. Health Education & Behavior 2004; 31: 65-76.
7. US Department of Agriculture (USDA). National School Lunch Program: Nutrition Standards for Lunches and Menu Planning Methods (7 CFR 210.10). Report 63 FR 9721. Alexandria, VA: USDA, Food and Nutrition Service, 1997.
8. Fox MK, Crepinsek MK, Connor P, Battaglia M. (SNDA) School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study - II(Summary Findings). Report CN-01-SNDAII. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation, April 2001.
9. French SA, Story M, Fulkerson JA, Gerlach AF. Food environment in secondary schools: a la carte, vending machines, and food policies and practices. American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93: 1161-7.
10. Kubik MY, Lytle LA, Hannan PJ, Perry CL, Story M. The association of the school food environment with dietary behaviors of young adolescents. American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93: 1168-73.
11. Ho C, Gould RA, Jensen LN, Kiser SJ, Mozar A, Jensen JB. Evaluation of the nutrient content of school, snack and vending lunch of junior high students. School Food Service Research Review 1991; 15: 85-90.
12. Gleason P, Suitor C. Children's Diets in the Mid-1990's: Dietary Intake and Its Relationship with School Meal Participation. Report CN-01-CD1. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation, January 2001.
13. Cullen KW, Eagan J, Baranowski T, Owens E, de Moor C. Effect of a la carte and snack bar foods at school on children's lunchtime intake of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2000; 100: 1482-6.
14. Cullen KW, Zakeri I. Fruits, vegetables, milk, and sweetened beverages consumption and access to a la carte/snack bar meals at school. American Journal of Public Health 2004; 94: 463-7.
15. Malloy C, Johanson J, Wootan M. The School Foods Tool Kit. Washington, DC: Center for Science in the Public Interest, 2003.
16. Cullen KW, Thompson VJ, Watson K, Nicklas T. Marketing fruit and vegetables to middle school students: formative assessment results. Journal of Child Nutrition & Management 2005; 29(2). Available at http://d.cs.schoolnutrition.org/newsroom/jcnm/05fall/cullen/index.asp
17. Baxter SD, Thompson WO, Davis HC, Johnson MH. Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders' self-reports of school lunch. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1997; 97: 1293-8.
18. Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, Leonard SB, Riley P. Baranowski J. Fruit and vegetable food frequencies by fourth and fifth grade students: validity and reliability. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1994; 13: 1-7.
19. Cullen KW, Himes JH, Baranowski T, Pettit J, Stevens M, Slawson DL, et al. Validity and reliability of a behavior-based food coding system for measuring fruit, 100% fruit juice, vegetable, and sweetened beverage consumption: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies. Preventive Medicine 2004; 38(Suppl.): S24-33.
20. Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting, and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994.
21. Box GEP, Tiao GC. ARIMA: intervention model for ozone data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975; 70: 70-5.
22. McCleary R, Hay JRA. Applied Time Series Analysis for Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980.
23. Meyer M, Conklin M, Lewis J, Marshak J, Cousin S, et al. Barriers to healthy nutrition environment in public school middle grades. Journal of Child Nutrition & Management 2001; 25: 66-71.
24. Cohen R, Ramani AK, Nogales R, Ohls J, Sinclair M. Measuring Competitive Foods in Schools: A Point of Sales Approach. Report CN-04-CFMPR. Alexandria, VA: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation, 2004.