Selection of euploid blastocysts for cryopreservation with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) results in increased implantation rates in subsequent frozen and thawed embryo transfer cycles

Molecular Cytogenetics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Yang, Zhihong ^a   Salem, Shala A ^a   Liu, Xiaohong ^b   Kuang, Yanping ^c   Salem, Rifaat D ^a   Liu, Jiaen ^b  

^a Pacific Reproductive Center   (United States)

^b Beijing Jia En De Yun Hospital   (China)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

aCGH; Cryopreservation; Implantation; Trophectoderm biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARRAY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL SELECTION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NIDATION; OVARY CYCLE; PLOIDY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84881505577     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17558166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-32     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Blastocyst culture and transfer: analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs. Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK, Lane M, Schlenker T, Hamilton F, Meldrum DR, Fertl Steril 1999 72 604 609 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00311-8 (Pubitemid 29475115)
2. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarrez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB, Fertil Steril 2004 81 551 555 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023 15037401 (Pubitemid 38376109)
3. Aneuploidy screening for embryo selection. Fragouli E, Wells D, Semin Reprod Med 2012 30 289 301 22723010
4. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality and embryo gender. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D, Fertil Steril 2011 95 520 524 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2010.04.003 20537630
5. Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused by aneuploid embryos. Hodes-Wertz B, Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B, Laskin CA, Glassner M, Munné S, Fertil Steril 2012 98 675 680 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.025 22683012
6. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via stand morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Yang Z, Liu J, Collins G, Salem S, Liu X, S-Lyle S, Peck A, Sill ES, Salem R, Mol Cytogenet 2012 5 24 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 22551456
7. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we knew. Hassold T, Hunt P, Curr Opin Pediatr 2009 21 703 708 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328332c6ab 19881348
8. Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Verlinsky Y, Cytogenetgenome Res 2005 111 193 198 10.1159/000086889 (Pubitemid 41414468)
9. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A, Hum Reprod 2002 17 413 419 10.1093/humrep/17.2.413 11821287 (Pubitemid 34168450)
10. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V, Fertil Steril 2007 87 534 541 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1512 17123520 (Pubitemid 46385969)
11. Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Magli C, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, Warburton D, Prenat Diagn 2004 24 638 643 10.1002/pd.957 15305354 (Pubitemid 39108572)
12. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Munné S, Chen S, Colls P, Garrisi J, Zheng X, Cekleniak N, Lenzi M, Hughes P, Fischer J, Garrisi M, Tomkin G, Cohen J, Reprod Biomed Online 2007 14 628 634 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61057-7 17509208
13. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, Debrock S, Amyere M, Vikkula M, Schuit F, Fryns JP, Verbeke G, D'Hooghe T, Moreau Y, Vermeesch JR, NatMed 2009 15 577 583
14. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Wilton L, Hum Reprod Update 2005 11 33 41 15569702 (Pubitemid 40201974)
15. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A, Hum Reprod 2004 19 2849 2858 10.1093/humrep/deh536 15471934 (Pubitemid 40028958)
16. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, Hillensjö T, Nilsson L, Stevic J, Reismer E, Borg K, Wikland M, Bergh C, Hum Reprod 2008 23 2806 2812 10.1093/humrep/ den217 18583331
17. Preimplantation aneuploidy testing for infertile patients of advanced maternal age: a randomized prospective trial. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Stevens J, Rawlins M, Munné S, Fertil Steril 2009 92 157 162 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.029 18692827
18. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. Masternbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoever HR, N Engl JMed 2007 357 9 17 10.1056/NEJMoa067744 (Pubitemid 47026730)
19. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Masternbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S, Hum Reprod Update 2011 17 454 466 10.1093/humupd/dmr003 21531751
20. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R, Prenat Diagn 1999 19 846 851 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199909)19:9<846::AID-PD657>3.0.CO;2-# 10521843 (Pubitemid 29438175)
21. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Wells D, Delhanty JDA, Mol Hum Reprod 2000 6 1055 1062 10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055 11044470
22. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybridization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting "competent" embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Ginsburg M, Maassarani G, Yakut T, Baltaci V, Kotze D, Unsal E, Fertil Steril 2007 87 1033 1040 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.108 17258713 (Pubitemid 46659945)
23. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage embryos. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D, Hum Reprod 2008 23 2596 2608 10.1093/humrep/den287 18664475
24. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D, Hum Reprod 2011 26 1560 1574 10.1093/humrep/der068 21447693
25. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S, Reprod Biomed Online 2008 17 814 817 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60410-5 19079966
26. Live birth after polar body array comprehensive genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C, Ndukwe G, Kelada E, Thomton S, Jenner L, Cater E, Brown A, Garcia-Bernardo J, Fertil Steril 2010 93 1006.e7 1006.e10 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.055
27. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, Wells D, Munné S, Fertil Steril 2011 95 953 958 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010 20971462
28. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation using array comparative genomic hybridization. Fioretino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Birricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Lammarrone E, Gordon A, Pantos K, Hum Reprod 2011 26 1925 1935 10.1093/humrep/der082 21489979
29. Trophectoderm cells derived from blastocyst biopsy are suitable for array CGH analysis of 24 chromosomes. Yang Z, Salem S, Salem-Lyle S, Bayrak A, Salem RD, Fertil Steril 2011 95 Suppl 4 23 Abstr
30. Single thawed euploid embryo transfer improves IVF pregnancy, miscarriage, and multiple gestation outcomes and has similar implantation rates as egg donation. Grifo JA, Hodes-Wertz B, Lee H-L, Amperloquio E, Clark-Williams M, Adler A, J Assist Reprod Genet 2013 30 259 264 10.1007/s10815-012-9929-1 23307447
31. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott RT, Fertil Steril 2010 94 2017 2021 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.052 20188357
32. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott R Jr, Mol Hum Reprod 2010 16 590 600 10.1093/molehr/gaq037 20479065
33. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, Ross R, Alper M, Barrett B, Frederick J, Potter D, Behr B, Rabinowitz M, Hum Reprod 2010 25 1066 1075 10.1093/humrep/dep452 20100701
34. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Ferry K, Katz-Jaffe M, Scott R Jr, Fert Steril 2011 96 638 640 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011. 06.049
35. PGD and aneuploidy screening for 24 chromosome by genome-wide SNP analysis: seeing the woods and the trees. Handyside AH, Reprod Biomed Online 2011 23 686 691 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.012 22033395
36. Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates. Forman EJ, Tao X, Ferry KM, Taylor D, Treff NR, Scott R Jr, Hum Reprod 2012 27 1217 1222 10.1093/humrep/des020 22343551
37. Comprehensive genetic assessment of the human embryo: can empiric application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization reduce multiple gestation rate by single fresh blastocyst transfer? Sills ES, Yang Z, Walsh D, Salem S, Archgynecol Obstet 2012 286 755 761
38. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: State of the ART 2011. Harper JC, Sengupta SB, Humgenet 2012 131 175 186
39. Array comparative genomic hybridization screening in IVF significantly reduces number of embryos available for cryopreservation. Liu J, Sills ES, Yang Z, Salem S, Rahil T, Collins G, Liu X, Salem R, Clin Exp ReprodMed 2012 39 52 57 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.2.52
40. Characteristics of consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles among patients treated with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotropin versus FSH alone. Sills ES, Schattman GL, Veeck LL, Liu HC, Prasad M, Rosenwaks Z, Fertil Steril 1998 69 831 835 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00046-6 9591488 (Pubitemid 28193915)
41. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Iada S, Kato O, Reprod Biomed Online 2005 11 608 614 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61169-8 16409712 (Pubitemid 41700770)
42. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. deMouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Andersen AN, Hum Reprod 2010 25 1851 1862 10.1093/humrep/deq124 20570973
43. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2007: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. deMouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A, Hum Reprod 2012 27 954 966 10.1093/humrep/des023 22343707
44. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, deMouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, Kupka M, Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A, Hum Reprod 2012 27 2571 2584 10.1093/humrep/des255 22786779
45. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Fertil Steril 2012 98 368 377 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019 22698643
46. Clinic application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cobo A, Diaz C, Fertil Steril 2011 96 277 285 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030 21718983
47. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. Rezazadeh VM, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Assist Reprod Genet 2009 26 347 354 10.1007/s10815-009-9318-6
48. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, Lyu SW, Lee WS, Yoon TK, J Assist Reprod Genet 2011 28 369 374 10.1007/s10815-010-9530-4 21229386
49. Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles-time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J, Heng BC, Huang M, Ling X, Duan T, Tong GQ, Fertil Steril 2011 95 1691 1695 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2011.01.022 21315339
50. Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer. Kansal Kalra S, Ratcliffe SJ, Milman L, Gracia CR, Coutifaris C, Barnhart K, Fertil Steril 2011 95 548 553 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.049 20663500
51. Birth characteristics and perinatal outcome of babies conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Wada I, Macnamee MC, Wick K, Bradfield JM, Brinsden PR, Hum Reprod 1994 9 543 546 8006149 (Pubitemid 24096414)
52. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts. Wikland M, Hardarson T, Hillensjo T, Westin C, Westlander G, Wood M, Wennerholm UB, Hum Reprod 2010 25 1699 1707 10.1093/humrep/deq117 20472913
53. Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. Aflatoonian A, MansooriMoghaddam F, Mashayekhy M, Mohamadian F, J Assist Reprod Genet 2010 27 695 700 10.1007/s10815-010-9470-z 20886367
54. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Wang YA, Sulliban EA, Black D, Dean J, Bryant J, Chapman M, Fertil Steril 2005 83 1650 1658 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.033 15950632 (Pubitemid 40824795)
55. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos of oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Wennerholm UB, SoderstromAnttila V, Bergh C, Aittomaki K, Hazekamp J, Nygren KG, Selbing A, Loft A, Hum Reprod 2009 24 2158 2172 10.1093/humrep/dep125 19458318