Linking response quality to survey engagement: A combined random scale and latent variable approach

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-12

  Hess, Stephane ^a   Stathopoulos, Amanda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Hybrid model; Latent variables; Random scale; Stated choice; Survey engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881383170     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2013.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arentze, T., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H., DelMistro, R., 2003. Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy. Transportation Research Part E 39 (3), 229-244.
2. Ashok, K., Dillon, W.R., Yuan, S., 2002. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 31-46.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A., Gopinath, D., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., 2002. Integration of choice and latent variable models. In: Mahmassani, H. (Ed.), In Perpetual Motion, Pergamon, pp. 431-470. Ch. 13.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., McFadden, D., Garling, T., Gopinath, D., Bolduç D., BOrsch-Supan, A., Delquie, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Rao, V., 1999. Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters 10 (3), 187-203.
5. Bliemer, M.C.J., Rose, J.M., 2009. Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-The-Art In: Kitamura, R., Yoshi, T., Yamamoto, T. (Eds.), The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research, Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 459-498.
6. Bolduc, D., Alvarez-Daziano, R., 2010. On estimation of hybrid choice models. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (Eds.), Choice Modelling: The State-of-The-Art and the State-of-Practice: Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference, Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 259-288.
7. Bolduc, D., Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Michaud, A., 2005. Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models. In: Lee-Gosselin, M., Doherty, S. (Eds.), Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 275-302.
8. Breffle, W.S., Morey, E.R., 2000. Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete-choice recreation demand model of atlantic salmon fishing. Marine Resource Economics 15 (1), 1-20.
9. Caussade, S., Ortüzar, J. de D., Rizzi, LI., Hensher, D.A., 2005. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research Part B 39 (7), 621-640.
10. DeShazo, JR., Fermo, G., 2002. Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1), 123-143.
11. Doornik, J.A., 2001. Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language. Timberlake Consultants Press, London.
12. Feit, E.M., 2009. Extending the Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Error Scale and Decision-Maker Characteristics. Working Paper Series, The Wharton School, Philadelphia.
13. Fiebig, D.G., Keane, M., Louviere, J.J., Wasi, N., 2010. The generalized multinomial logit: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science 29 (3), 393-421.
14. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., 2010. Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models. Transportation 37 (3), 413-428.
15. Heiner, R., 1983. The origin of predictable behavior. American Economic Review 73, 560-595.
16. Hess, S., Rose, J., 2012 Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models?, Transportation 39 (6), 1225-1239.
17. Hess, S., Train, K., 2011. Recovery of inter-And intra-personal heterogeneity using mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part B 45 (7), 973-990.
18. Hess, S., Train, K., Polak,J.W., 2006. On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice. Transportation Research Part B 40 (2), 147-163.
19. Hollander, Y., 2005. The attitude of bus users to travel time variability. Paper Presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg.
20. Johnson, E.J., Payne, J.W., 1985. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science 31 (April (4)), 395-414.
21. Joreskog, K.G., Sorbom, D., 1996. LISREL 8: Users Reference Guide. Scientific Software International.
22. Keane, M., 2006. The generalized logit model: preliminary ideas on a research program. Presentation at Motorola-CenSoC Hong Kong Meeting, October 22, 2006.
23. Klein, N.M., Yadav, MS., 1989. Context effects on effort and accuracy in choice: an enquiry into adaptive decision making. Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 15 (4), 411-421.
24. Louviere, ii., Eagle, T., 2006. Confound it That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions. Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference, 2006.
25. Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Meyer, R.J., Irwin, J., Bunch, D.S., Carson, R., Dellaert, B., Hanemann, W.M., 1999. Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Marketing Letters 10 (3), 205-217.
26. Louviere, ii., Islam, T., Wasi, N., Street, D., Burgess, L, 2008. Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price? Journal of Consumer Research 35, 360-375.
27. Louviere, J.J., Meyer, R.J., 2008. Formal choice models of informal choices: What choice modeling research can (and cant) learn from behavioral theory. Review of Marketing Research 4, 3-32.
28. Touviere,JJ, Street, fl, Carson, it, Ainslie, A, DeShaio, Jit, Cameron, T, Hensher, DA, Kohn, it, Marley, T, 2002 Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Letters 13 (3), 177-193.
29. Lundhede, T.H., Olsen, SB., Jacobsen, J.B., Thorsen, B.J., 2009. Handling respondent uncertainty in choice experiments: evaluating recoding approaches against explicit modelling of uncertainty. Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2), 118-147.
30. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J., 1992. Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1), 8 7-131.
31. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J., 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press.
32. Raveau, S., Alvarez-Daziano, R., Yáflez, M., Bolduc, D., Ortüzar,J. de D., 2010. Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models: some new findings. Transportation Research Record 2156, 131-139.
33. Revelt, D., Train, IC, 1998. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households? choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 647-657.
34. Rose, J.M., Black, G., 2006. Means matter, but variance matter too: Decomposing response latency influences on variance heterogeneity in stated preference experiments. Marketing Letters 17 (4), 295-310.
35. Scarpa, R., Ruto, E.S.IC, Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Drucher, A.G., Rege, J.E.O., 2003. Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates. Ecological Economics 45, 409-426.
36. Swait, J., Adamowicz, W., 2001. The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1), 135-148.
37. Swait, J., Bernardino, A., 2000. Distinguishing taste variation from error structure in discrete choice data. Transportation Research Part B 34 (January (1)), 1-15.