Dissecting the Random Component of Utility

Marketing Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 177-193

  Louviere, Jordan ^a   Street, Deborah ^a   Carson, Richard ^b   Ainslie, Andrew ^c   Deshazo, J R ^c   Cameron, Trudy ^d   Hensher, David ^e   Kohn, Robert ^f   Marley, Tony ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^f Australian Graduate School of Management   (Australia)

^g MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Choice models; Heterogeneity; Random components; Unobserved variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005492287     PISSN: 09230645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020258402210     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. (1994). "Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292.
2. Ainslie, A., and P. E. Rossi. (1998). "Similarities in Choice Behavior Across Product Categories," Marketing Science, 17, 91-106.
3. Allenby, G., and P. Rossi. (1999). "Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, 89(1-2), 57, 78.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., and T. Morikawa. (1990). "Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions," Transportation Research A, 24A, 485-495.
5. Brazell, J., J. Gray-Lee, and J. J. Louviere, (1998). "Revisiting Order Effects: Are They Just Differences in Random Variation?" Paper presented to the Marketing Science Conference, Fontainebleau, France, July.
6. Bunch, D. S. et al. (1998). "Comparing the Effects of Survey Medium, Numbers of Choice Options and Numbers of Attributes on Choices: Maybe It's Just Differences In Error Variability?" Paper presented to the INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Fontainbleau (INSEAD), France, July.
7. k Choice Experiments," Research Report, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney.
8. Cameron, T. A., and M. D. James. (1987). "Efficient Estimation Method for Closed-Ended Contingent Valuation Surveys," Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 269-276.
9. Cameron, T. A. et al. (forthcoming). "Alternative Nonmarket Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
10. Cronbach, L. J. et al. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. New York: John Wiley.
11. de Palma, André, Gordon Myers, and Yorgos Papageorgiou. (1994). "Rational Choice Under an Imperfect Ability to Choose," American Economic Review, 84(4), 419-440.
12. Dellaert, Benedict, Jeff D. Brazell, and Jordan, J. Louviere. (1999). "The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice Consistency," Marketing Letters, 10(2), 139-147.
13. Desarbo, W. et al. (1997). "Representing Heterogeneity in Consumer Response Models," Marketing Letters, 8, 335-348.
14. DeShazo, J. R., and G. Fermo. (2001a). "Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, forthcoming.
15. DeShazo, J. R., and G. Feimo. (2001b). "Rational Choice with Cognitive Limitations: Empirical Support for Partial-information Processing Strategies," Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Economics, UCLA.
16. Finn, A., and U. Kayande. (1997). "Reliability Assessment and Optimization of Marketing Measurement," Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 262-275.
17. Finn, A., and U. Kayande (1998). "The Service Quality Measurement Literature: A Generalizability Perspective," Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 7, 97-130.
18. Hensher, D. A., J. J. Louviere, and J. Swait. (1999). "Combining Sources of Preference Data," Journal of Econometrics, 89, 197-221.
19. Louviere, J., and G. Woodworth. (1983). "Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data," Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.
20. Louviere, J. J. et al. (1999). "Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modelling Complex Decision Processes," Marketing Letters, 10(3), 187-204.
21. Louviere, J., M. Fox, and W. Moore. (1993). "Cross-Task Validity Comparisons of Stated Preference Choice Models," Marketing Letters, 4(3), 205-213.
22. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. McClelland, G. H., and C. M. Judd. (1993). "The Statistical Difficulties of Detecting Interactions and Moderator effects," Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 376-390.
24. McFadden, D. (2001). "Disaggregate Behavioural Travel Demand's RUM Side: A 30-Year Retrospective," in Travel Behavioural Research: The Leading Edge, Editor, D. A. Hensher, Amsterdam: Pergamon, 17-64.
25. McFadden, D., and K. Train. (2000). "Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447-470.
26. Ohler, T. et al. (2000). "Attribute Range Effects in Binary Response Tasks," Marketing Letters, 11(3), 249-260.
27. Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley.
28. Revelt, D., and K. Train. (1998). "Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level," Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 1-11.
29. Severin, V. (2001). "Comparing Statistical and Respondent Efficiency In Choice Experiments," Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Discipline of Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Business, The University of Sydney (August).
30. Severin, V., J. J. Louviere, and A. Finn. (2000). "The Stability of Retail Shopping Choices Over Time and Across Countries," Journal of Retailing, 77, 185-201.
31. Shavelson, R. J., and N. M. Webb. (1991). Generalizability Theory: A Primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Shivery, T., G. Allenby, and R. Kohn. (2000). "Identifying Latent Relationships in Marketing: Nonparametric Estimation of Binary Latent Regression," Marketing Science, 19, 149-162.
33. k Paired Comparison Experiments," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 30, 2149-2171.
34. Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. (2001). "Optimal and Near-optimal Pairs for the Estimation of Effects in 2-level Choice Experiments," Unpublished Technical Report, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney.
35. Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. (2001a). "Choice Complexity and Decision Strategy Selection," Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 135-148.
36. Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. (2001b). "Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, forthcoming.
37. Swait, J. D., and J. J. Louviere. (1993). "The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models," Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 305-314.
38. Swait, J., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. (1994). "A Sequential Approach to Exploiting the Combined Strengths of SP and RP Data: Application to Freight Shipper Choice," Transportation, 21(2), 135-152.
39. Train, K. (1997). "Mixed Logit Models for Recreation Demand, in Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models, Editors, C. Kling and J. Herriges, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
40. Tversky, A. (1969). "The Intransitivity of Preferences," Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
41. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. (1986). "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions," Journal of Business, 59(4) (part 2), S251-S278.
42. Verbeke, G., and G. Molenberghs, editors. (1997). Linear Mixed Models in Practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
43. Yatchew, A., and Z. Griliches. (1984). "Specification Error in Probit Models," Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, 134-139.
44. Yeoh, A. et al. (1998). "Does Missing Information Affect Means or Variances of Error Distributions?" Paper Presented to the INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, INSEAD, Fontainbleau, France, June.