Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete-choice recreation demand model of atlantic salmon fishing

Marine Resource Economics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-20

  Breffle, William S ^a   Morey, Edward R ^b  

^a ABT ASSOCIATES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Atlantic Salmon fishing; Complete demand system; Discrete choice travel cost model; Logit; Preference heterogeneity; Random parameters; Recreation demand

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012152040     PISSN: 07381360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/mre.15.1.42629285     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abramowitz, M., and I. Stegun. 1965. Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover Publications.
2. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and J. Swait. 1998. Introduction to Attribute-based Stated Choice Methods. Report to the Resource Valuation Branch, Damage Assessment Center, NOAA, purchase order 43AANC601388.
3. Aptech Systems, Inc. 1996. Gauss Applications: Maximum Likelihood 4.0.18, 23804 South East Kent-Kangley Rd., Maple Valley, WA 98038.
4. Beggs, S., S. Cardell, and J. Hausman. 1981. Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars. Journal of Econometrics 16: 1-19.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., and T. Morikawa. 1990. Estimation of Switching Models from Revealed Preferences and Stated Intentions. Transportation Research A 24A: 485-95.
6. Ben-Akiva, M., J. Walker, A.T. Bernardino, D.A. Gopinath, T. Morikawa, and A. Polydoropoulou. 1997. Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models. Discussion paper. University of Texas, Austin.
7. Boxall, P., and V. Adamowicz. 1998. Heterogeneity of Preferences for Environmental Goods and Services. Discussion paper. University of Alberta.
8. Breffle, W.S., E.R. Morey, and D.M. Waldman. 2000. Gaussian Quadrature Versus Simulation for the Estimation of Random Parameters: Some Evidence from Stated Preference Recreational Choice Data. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, University of Colorado and Stratus Consulting.
9. Brownstone, D., and K. Train. 1999. Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns. Journal of Econometrics 89(1): 109-29. (Pubitemid 128416647)
10. Cameron, T.A., and J. Englin. 1997. Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 296-313. (Pubitemid 27309191)
11. Chamberlain, G. 1984. Panel data. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, Z. Griliches and M.D. Intrilligator, eds. New York: North-Holland.
12. Fowkes, T., and M. Wardman. 1988. The Design of Stated Preference Travel Choice Experiments. Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy 27-44.
13. Hausman, J.A., and D. Wise. 1978. A Conditional Probit Model of Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogenous Preferences. Econometrica 46(2): 403-26.
14. Herriges, J.A., and C.L Kling. 1997. Nonlinear Income Effects in Random Utility Models. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, Iowa State University.
15. Johnson, F.R., and W.H. Desvousges. 1997. Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34: 79-99. (Pubitemid 27451419)
16. Layton, D.L., and G. Brown. 1998. Heterogenous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change. Paper presented at the NOAA workshop "Application of Stated Preference Methods to Resource Compensation." Washington, D.C.
17. Louviere, J. 1996. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data: The Rescaling Revolution. Paper presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Lake Tahoe.
18. Louviere, J., and J. Swait. 1997. Separating Weights and Scale Values in Conjoint Tasks Using Choices of Best and Worst Attribute Levels. Discussion paper. University of Sydney.
19. Mansfield, E. 1980. Statistics for Business and Economics, 3rd ed. New York: Norton & Co.
20. McFadden, D. 1986. The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research. Marketing Science 5(4): 275-97.
21. -. 1996. Computing Willingness-to-pay in Random Utility Models. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
22. McFadden, D., and K. Train. 1998. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response. Discussion paper. University of California, Berkeley.
23. Morey, E.R. 1981. The Demand for Site-specific Recreational Activities: A Characteristics Approach. Journal of Environmental and Economic Management 8: 345-71. (Pubitemid 12274811)
24. -. 1999. TWO RUMs UnCLOAKED: Nested-logit Models of Site Choice and Nested-logit Models of Participation and Site Choice. Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models, C. Kling and J. Herriges, eds. Edgar Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
25. Morey, E.R., W.S. Breffle, R.D. Rowe, and D.M. Waldman. 1999a. Estimating the Damages from Injuries to Trout in Montana's Clark Fork River: Participation, Site Choice, and Endogenous Expected Catch Rates. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, University of Colorado and Stratus Consulting.
26. Morey, E.R., T. Buchanan, and D.M. Waldman. 1999. Happy (Hypothetical) Trails to You: The Impact of Trail Characteristics and Access Fees on a Mountain Biker's Trail Selection and Consumer's Surplus. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, University of Colorado.
27. Morey, E.R., and K.G. Rossmann. 1999. Combining Random Parameters and Classic Heterogeneity to Estimate the Benefits of Decreasing Acid Deposition Injuries to Marble Monuments in Washington, D.C. Discussion paper. Department of Economics, University of Colorado.
28. Morey, E., K.G. Rossmann, L. Chestnut, and S. Ragland. 1999b. Modeling and Estimating WTP for Reducing Acid Deposition Injuries to Cultural Resources: Using Choice Experiments in a Group Setting to Estimate Passive-use Values. Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts, Chapter 10, S. Narvud and R. Ready, eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
29. Morey, E.R., R.D. Rowe, and M. Watson. 1993. A Repeated Nested-logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 578-92. (Pubitemid 24388826)
30. Phaneuf, D.J., C.L. Kling, and J.A. Herriges. 1998. Valuing Water Quality Improvements Using Revealed Preference Methods when Corner Solutions are Present. Discussion paper. Iowa State University.
31. Pollack, R.A., and T.J. Wales. 1992. Demand System Specification and Estimation. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Provencher, B., and R.C. Bishop. 1997. An Estimable Dynamic Model of Recreation Behavior with an Application to Great Lakes Angling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33(2): 107-27. (Pubitemid 27266562)
33. Revelt, D., and K. Train. 1998. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80(4): 647-57. (Pubitemid 128344306)
34. Stern, S. 1997. Simulation-based Estimation. Journal of Economic Literature.
35. Swait, J., and J. Louviere. 1993. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models. Journal of Marketing Research 30: 305-14.
36. Swait, J., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1994. A Sequential Approach to Exploiting the Combined Strengths of SP and RP Data: Application to Freight Shipper Choice. Transportation 21: 135-52.
37. Train, K.E. 1998. Recreation Demand Models with Taste Difference over People. Land Economics 74.