Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modeling Complex Decision Processes

Marketing Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 205-217

  Louviere, Jordan J ^a   Meyer, Robert J ^b   Bunch, David S ^c   Carson, Richard ^d   Dellaert, Benedict ^e   Hanemann, W Michael ^f   Hensher, David ^a   Irwin, Julie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice dynamics; Choice modeling; Context effects; Data pooling; Started preference data

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001087909     PISSN: 09230645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008050215270     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere and M. Williams (1994), Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26:271-292.
2. Alberini, Anna (1992), The Informational Content of Binary Responses, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
3. Bazerman, Max H., Loewenstein, George F., White, Sally B. (1992), "Reversals of Preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol 37(2), 220-240.
4. Ben-Akiva, M. and Morikawa, T. (1990) "Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions," Transportation Research, 24A(6):485-495.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., Bradley, M., Morikawa, T., Benjamin, J., Novak, T., Oppewal, H. and Rao, V (1994) "Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences Data" Marketing Letters: Special Issue on the Duke Invitational Conference on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice Behavior, 5(4).
6. Blamey, R. K., Bennett, J. W., Morrison, M. D. and J. J. Louviere (1998), "Divergences in revealed and stated preferences and the effect of social desirability prompts: validation of a choice experiment involving green product choice", Paper presented to the Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, Santiago, Chile, November 15-19.
7. Brewer, A. and Hensher, D. A. "Distributed Work and Travel Behaviour The Dynamics of Interactive Agency Choices Between Employers and Employees" presented at the 8th IATBR Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Austin, Texas, September 1997.
8. Bunch, David S., "Information and Sample Size Requirements for Estimating Non-IID Discrete Choice Models Using Stated-Choice Experiments," Working Paper UCD GSM 0399, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, February 1999.
9. Burke, Raymond R. Harlam, Bari A. Kahn, Barbara E. Lodish, Leonard M. (1992), "Comparing Dynamic Consumer Choice in Real and Computer-Simulated Environments", Journal of Consumer Research. 19(1): 71-82.
10. Cameron, W. D. Schulze, R. G. Ethier, and G. L. Poe (1998), "Alternative Nonmarket Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?" working paper, Department of Economics, UCLA.
11. Cooper, Lee G., and Masao Nakanishi (1988), Market-Share Analysis. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Erdem, Tulin. Keane, Michael P. (1996), "Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets". Marketing Science. 15(1): 1-20.
13. Gonul, Fusun. Srinivasan, Kannan (1996), "Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior. A dynamic structural model." Marketing Science. 15(3): 262-279.
14. Guadagni, P. M. and J. D. C. Little (1983), "A Logit Model of Brand Choice Based on Scanner Data", Marketing Science, 2(Summer), 203-238.
15. Geweke, J. F. and M. P. Keane (1999), "Bayesian inference for dynamic discrete choice models without the need for dynamic programming," In Mariano, Schuman and Weeks (Eds.) Simulation Based Inference and Econometrics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming.
16. Hensher, D. A. and M. Bradley (1993), Using stated response data to enrich revealed preference discrete choice models, Marketing Letters, 4(2):39-152.
17. Hutchinson, J. W., Kamakura, W. A. and J. G. Lynch (1997) "Unobserved heterogeneity as an alternative explanation for "reversal" effects in behavioral research," Unpublished working paper, Dept. of Marketing, Wharton School of Business, U. of Pennsylvania, November.
18. Irwin, Julie R. (1994), "Buying/selling price preference reversals: Preference for environmental changes in buying versus selling modes." Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes. Vol 60(3), Dec., 431-457.
19. Irwin, Julie R., and Meyer, Robert J. (1999): Training the multilingual judge: the effects effects of learning on response-mode effects in multiattribute decision making", Working Paper, Department of Marketing, the Wharton School of Business.
20. Johnson, Eric J., Meyer, Robert J. (1984)," Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context". Journal of Consumer Research. Vol 11(1), Jun 1984, 528-541.
21. Johnson, Eric J., Meyer, Robert, Hardie, Bruce, and Walsh, John (1998), "Process-Assisted Choice Modeling", Working paper, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.
22. Kagel, John, and Roth, Alvin (1995), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton