The current state of the empirical evidence for psychoanalysis: A meta-analytic approach

Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 107-137

  De Maat, Saskia ^a,b   De Jonghe, Frans ^b   De Kraker, Ruth ^b   Leichsenring, Falk ^c   Abbass, Allan ^d   Luyten, Patrick ^e   Barber, Jacques P ^f   Van, Rien ^b   Dekker, Jack ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Instituut   (Netherlands)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^f ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BORDERLINE STATE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DISEASES; EGO; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; META ANALYSIS; MOOD DISORDER; NEUROSIS; OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARANOIA; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84881280836     PISSN: 10673229     EISSN: 14657309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e318294f5fd     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Shedler J. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am Psychol 2010;65:98-109.
2. Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a metaanalysis. Br J Psychiatry 2011;199:15-22.
3. Bachrach H, Galatzer-Levy R, Skolnikoff A, Waldron S. On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1991;39:871-916.
4. Galatzer-Levy R, Bachrach H, Skolnikoff A,Waldon S. Does psychoanalysis work? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.
5. Doidge N. Empirical evidence for the efficacy of psychoanalytic psychotherapies and psychoanalysis: an overview. Psychoanal Inq 1997;suppl:102-50.
6. Fonagy P. An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytical Association, 2002.
7. Doidge N. Is psychoanalysis effective? Econ Neurosci 2001; 3:41-7.
8. de Maat S, de Jonghe F, Schoevers R, Dekker J. The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: a systematic review of empirical studies. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009;17:1-23.
9. Jacobs DH. Three models of training. Am Psychoanalyst 2007;41:11-9.
10. Mertens W. Einführung in die psychoanalytische therapie [Introduction to psychoanalytic therapy], vol. 2. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1990.
11. Gabbard GO. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a basic text. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004.
12. Kernberg OF. A severe sexual inhibition in the course of the psychoanalytic treatment of a patient with a narcissistic personality disorder. Int J Psychoanal 1999;80:899-908.
13. Fonagy P, Moran GS. Understanding psychic change in child psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal 1991;72:15-22.
14. Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300: 1551-65.
15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
16. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A, Carlsson J, Broberg J, Schubert J. Varieties of long-term outcome in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: a review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project (STOPP). Int J Psychoanal 2000;81:921-42.
17. Doidge N, Simon B, Brauer L, Grant DC, et al. Psychoanalytic patients in the U.S., Canada, and Australia: I. DSMIII- R disorders, indications, previous treatment, medications, and length of treatment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2002;50: 575-614.
18. Doidge WJ, et al. Psychoanalytic patients in the U.S., Canada, and Australia: II. A DSM-III-R validation study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2002;50:615-27.
19. Caligor E, Stern BL, Hamilton M, et al. Why we recommend analytic treatment for some patients and not for others. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2009;57:677-94.
20. de Jonghe F, de Maat S, Barber JP, et al. Designs for studying effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic treatments: balancing level of evidence and acceptability for patients. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2012;60:361-87.
21. Cuijpers P, van Straten A,Warmerdam L, Andersson G. Psychological treatment of depression: a meta-analytic database of randomized studies. BMC Psychiatry 2008;8:36.
22. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, eds. Cochrane reviewers' handbook: 4.2.2. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. http://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/ hemila/karlowski/handbook-4-2-2-Karlowski.pdf
23. Leichsenring F. Randomised controlled versus naturalistic studies: a new research agenda. Bull Menninger Clin 2004; 68:137-51.
24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
25. Comprehensive meta-analysis (version 2.2.021). Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
26. Hedges LV, Vevea JL. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 1998;3:486-504.
27. DunlapWP, Cortina JM, Vaslow JB, BurkeMJ.Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Methods 1996;1:170-7.
28. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic, 1985.
29. Huedo-Medina TB, Sanchez-Meca J, Botella J, Marin- Martinez F. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index. Psychol Methods 2006;11:193-206.
30. Higgins JP, Thompsom SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
31. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in metaanalysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-63.
32. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J. Klinisch geval of worried well? Een beschrijving van patiënten voorafgaand aan psychoanalytische behandeling. Psychologie en Gezondheid 2007; 35:76-84.
33. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J. Differential selectivity of patients assigned to long-term psychoanalytic treatment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2007;55:294-9.
34. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J. Identifying clinical cases among patients assigned to psychoanalytic treatment. BullMenninger Clin 2008;72:163-78.
35. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, de Jong JTVM. Symptomen en persoonlijkheidsproblemen voor, tijdens en na langdurige psychoanalytische behandelingen: een multiple-cohort studie. Psychologie en Gezondheid 2010;38;66-75.
36. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, de Wolf MHM. Psychoanlayse en psychoanalytische psychotherapie: Nederlands onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van beide behandelvormen. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapy 2010;36:22-39.
37. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J. Clinical significance of long-term psychoanalytic treatment. Bull Menninger Clin 2009;73:7-33.
38. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, de Jong JTVM. 2010. Effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic treatment: measuring personality functioning and symptomatic distress in a multiple-cohort design. PhD diss., VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands. http:// dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/15871/dissertation. pdf;jsessionid=0B3A8164AB35F765B1B956665FD9C413? sequence=1
39. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. A costutility analysis of psychoanalysis versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010;26:3-10.
40. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. The effects of long-termpsychoanalytic treatment on health care utilization and work productivity and their associated costs. J Psychiatr Pract 2010;16:209-16.
41. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, Katzko MW, de Jong JTVM. Changes in symptoms and interpersonal problems during the first two years of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Psychol Psychother 2012;85:203-19.
42. Berghout CC, Zevalkink J, de Wolf MHM. Psychoanalyse en psychoanalytische psychotherapie: effect groottes en klinische significantie. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 2010; 36:22-39.
43. Zevalkink J, Berghout CC. Expanding the evidence base for the cost-effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic treatment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2006;54:1313-9.
44. Zevalkink J, Berghout CC. Door de bank genomen. Hoe effectief zijn psychoanalytische behandelingen? Amsterdam: Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Instituut, 2008.
45. Zevalkink J, Berghout CC. Klinische besluitvorming ten aanzien van indicatie voor psychoanalyse en psychoanalytische psychotherapie: een empirische invalshoek. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie 2008;34:151-68.
46. Zevalkink J, Berghout CC. Mental health characteristics of patients assigned to long-term ambulatory psychoanalytic treatment: psychoanalysis versus psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychother Res 2008;18:316-25.
47. Cogan R, Porcerelli JH. Clinician reports of personality pathology of patients beginning and patients ending psychoanalysis. Psychol Psychother 2005;78:235-48.
48. Erle JB, Goldberg DA. The course of 253 analyses from selection to outcome. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2003;51:257-93.
49. Grande T, Dilg R, Jakobsen T, et al. Differential effects of two forms of psychoanalytic therapy: results of the Heidelberg- Berlin study. Psychother Res 2006;16:470-85.
50. Rudolf G, Dilg R, Grande T, Jakobsen T, et al. Effektivität und Effizienz psychoanalytischer Langzeittherapie: die Praxisstudie Analytische Langzeitpsychotherapie [Effectiveness and efficiency of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy: the practice study of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy]. In: Gerlach A, Springer A, Schlösser A, eds. Psychoanalyse des Glaubens [Psychoanalysis of religious belief]. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2004.
51. Huber D, Klug G. Munich Psychotherapy Study (MPS): the effectiveness of psychoanalytic longterm psychotherapy for depression. In: Society for Psychotherapy Research, ed. Book of abstracts: from research to practice. Ulm, Germany: Ulmer Textbank, 2006:154.
52. Huber D, Henrich G, Gastner J, Klug G.Must all have prices? The Munich Psychotherapy Study. In: Levy RA, Ablon JS, Kächele H, eds. Current clinical psychiatry: psychodynamic psychotherapy research: evidence-based practice and practicebased evidence. New York: Humana, 2012.
53. Kantrowitz J, Singer J, Knapp PH. Methodology for a prospective study of suitability for psychoanalyis: the role of psychological tests. Psychoanal Q 1975;44:371-91.
54. Kantrowitz J, Paolitto F, Sashin J, Solomon L, Katz A. Affect availability, tolerance, complexity and modulation in psychoanalysis: a follow-up of a longitudinal, prospective study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1986;34:529-59.
55. Kantrowitz J. Suitability for psychoanalysis. In: Langs R, ed. The yearbook of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, vol. 2. New York: Guilford, 1987:403-15.
56. Kantrowitz J, Katz A, Paolitto F, Sashin J, Solomon L. Changes in the level and quality of object relations in psychoanalysis: follow-up of a longitudinal prospective study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1987;35:529-60.
57. Kantrowitz J, Katz A, Paolitto F, Sashin J, Solomon L. The role of reality testing in psychoanalysis: follow-up of 22 cases. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1987;35:367-86.
58. Kantrowitz J, Katz AL, Paolitto F. Follow-up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: 1. Stability of change. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1990;38:471-96.
59. Kantrowitz J, Katz AL, Paolitto F. Follow-up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: 2. Development of the self-analytic function. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1990;38: 637-54.
60. Knekt P, Lindfors O, Laaksonen MA, et al. Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group. Quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, long-term and short-term psychotherapy on psychiatric symptoms, work ability and functional capacity during a 5-year follow-up. J Affect Disord 2011;132:37-47.
61. Leichsenring F, Biskup J, Kreische R, Staats H. The Göttingen study of psychoanalytic therapy: first results. Int J Psychoanal 2005;86:433-55.
62. Löffler-Stastka H, Rössler-Schülein H, Skale E. Prädiktoren des Therapieabruchs in psychoanalytische Behandlungen von Patiënten mit Persönlichkeitsstöhrungen. Zeitschrift Psychosomatischen und Medische Psychotherapie 2005; 54:63-76.
63. Luborsky L, Stuart J, Friedman S, et al. The Penn Psychoanalytic treatment collection: a set of complete and recorded psychoanalyses as a research resource. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2001;49:217-34.
64. von Rad M, Senf W, Bräutigam W. Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse in der Krankenversorgung: Ergebnisse des Heidelberger Katamnese-Projektes. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1998;48:88-100.
65. Heuft G, Seibuchler-EngecH, Taschke M, SenfW. Langzeitoutcome ambulanter psychoanalytischer Psychotherapien und Psychoanalysen. Ein textinhaltsanalytische Untersuchung von 53 Katamneseinterviews. Forum der Psychoanalyse Zeitschrift 1996;12:42-355.
66. Kordy H, von Rad M, Senf W. Time and its relevance for successful psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom 1988;49: 212-22.
67. Rudolf G, Manz R, Öri C. Ergebnisse psychoanalytischer Therapien. Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal 1994;40:25-40.
68. Wallerstein R. Forty-two lives in treatment: a study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford, 1986.
69. Kernberg O, Burstein ED, Coyne L, AppelbaumA,Horwitz L, Voth H. Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: the final report of the Menninger Foundation's Psychotherapy Research Project. Bull Menninger Clin 1972;36:1-275.
70. HartyM,Horwitz L. Therapeutic outcome as rated by patients, therapists, and judges. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33:957-61.
71. Sashin JI, Eldred S, vanAmerongen ST. A search for predictive factors in institute supervised cases: a retrospective study of 183 cases from 1959-1966 at the Boston Psychoanalytical Society and Institute. Int J Psychoanal 1975;56:343-59.
72. Weber JJ, Bachrach HM, Solomon M. Factors associated with outcome of psychoanalysis: a report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (II). Int Rev Psychoanal 1985;12:127-41.
73. Bachrach HM, Weber JJ, Solomon M. Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis (clinical and methodological considerations): report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (IV). Int Rev Psychoanal 1985;12:379-89.
74. Dührssen A. Dynamische Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse und analytische Gruppenpsychotherapie im Vergleich. Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal 1986;32:161-80.
75. Grossarth-Maticek R, Eysenck HJ. Prophylatic effect of psychoanalysis on cancer prone and heart disease prone probands as compared with control groups and behaviour therapy groups. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1990;21:91-9.
76. Keller W, Westhoff G, Dilg R, Rohner R, Studt HH; Study Group on Empirical Psychotherapy Research in Analytical Psychology. Efficacy and cost effectiveness aspects of outpatient (Jungian) psychoanalysis and psychotherapy-a catamnestic study. Berlin: Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Benjamin Franklin, Free University of Berlin, [1998]. http://www.uni-saarland.de/fak5/krause/ ulm97/keller.htm
77. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Target M, eds. Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment: perspectives for therapists and researchers. London, Philadelphia: Whurr, 2001.
78. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, Rüger B, Beutel M. How to study the 'quality of psychoanalytic treatments' and their longterm effects on patients' well-being: a representative, multiperspective follow-up study. Int J Psychoanal 2003;84:263-90.
79. Hartmann S, Zepf S. Einflüsse auf die Symptombesserung in der Psychotherapie bei Patienten mit unterschiedlichen Beschwerdebildern. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2004;54:445-56.
80. Stehle S. Psychotherapeutische Berfustätigkeit. Ergebnisse der DGPT-Therapeutenerhebung. In: Gerlach A, Schlösser A, Springer A, eds. Psychoanalyse des Glaubens [Psychoanalysis of religious belief]. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2004.
81. Rascon SR, Corona PC, Lartugue T, Rios JM, Garza DL. A successful trial utilizing the Leuzinger-Bohleber methodology for evaluation of psychoanalytic treatment: preliminary report. Int J Psychoanal 2005;86:1425-40.
82. Brockmann J, Schlüter T, Eckert J. Langzeitwirkungen psychoanalytische rund verhaltenstherapeutischer Langzeittherapien [Long-term outcome of long-term psychoanalytic and behavioral long-term therapy]. Psychotherapeut 2006;51:15-25.
83. Puschner B, Kraft S, Kächele H, Kordy H. Course of improvement over 2 years psychoanalytic and psychodynamic outpatient psychotherapy. Psychol Psychother 2007;80:51-68.
84. Knekt P, Lindfors O, VälikoskiM, Laaksonen M; the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group. Quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, long-term and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 5-year follow-up. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Madison, WI, June 2007.
85. Pampallona S, Bollini P, Tibaldi G, Kupelnick B, Munizza C. Combined pharmacotherapy and psychological treatment for depression: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:714-9.
86. Casacalenda N, Perry JC, Looper K. Remission in major depressive disorder: a comparison of pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and control conditions. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1354-60.
87. Löffler-Stastka H & Steinmair D. Psychoanalytical theory of affects and its applicability on the Affect Regulation and Affect Experience Q-Sort Test (AREQ). J Med Psychol 2009;1(1):10-20. http:// medicalpsychologyjournal.weebly.com/ uploads/1/3/7/9/1379865/loffler-10.pdf
88. Newton-Howes G, Tyrer P, Johnson T. Personality disorder and the outcome of depression: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:13-20.
89. Leichsenring F, Leibing E. The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:1223-32.
90. Lambert MJ. Psychotherapy outcome research. In: Bergin EA, ed. Handbook of psychotherapy. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1986:94-129.
91. Smit Y, Huibers MJH, Ioannidis JPA, van Dyck R, van Tilburg W, Arntz A. The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy-a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2012: 32:81-92.
92. Leichsenring F. Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. Int J Psychoanal 2005;86:841-68.
93. Seligman ME. The effectiveness of psychotherapy: the Consumer Reports Study. Am Psychol 1995;50:965-74.
94. Caligor E, Hilsenroth MJ, Devlin M, Rutherford BR, Terry M, Roose SP.Will patients accept randomization to psychoanalysis? A feasibility study. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2012; 60:337-60.
95. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Beutel M. Psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioral treatment: first data on the LARC depression study. Presentation at the Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies conference, Ulm, Germany, June 2009.
96. Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med 1982;72:233-40.
97. Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BrMed J 1998;317:1185-90.
98. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomised controlled trials, observational studies and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1887-92.
99. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000;342: 1878-86.
100. Shadish WR, Matt G, Navarro A, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 126:512-29.
101. Driessen E, Cuijpers P, de Maat S, Abbass A, de Jonghe F, Dekker JJM. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2010;30:25-36.
102. Van HL, Dekker J, Koelen J. Patient preference compared with random allocation in short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy with indicated addition of pharmacotherapy for depression. Psychother Res 2009;19:205-12.
103. Stewart RE, Chambless DL. Cognitive behaviour therapy for adult anxiety disorder in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of effectiveness studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009;77: 595-606.
104. Norton PJ, Price EC. A meta-analytic review of adult cognitive-behavioral treatment outcome across the anxiety disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007;195:521-31.
105. Lenzenweger MF, Desantis Castro D. Predicting change in borderline personality: using neurobehavioral systems indicators within an individual growth curve framework. Dev Psychopathol 2005;17:1207-37.
106. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Henne J, Silk KR. The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160;274-83.
107. McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, et al. Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypical, borderline, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of Axis II disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:883-9.
108. Stone M. Long-term outcome in personality disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1993;162:299-313.
109. de Clerq B, van Leeuwan K, van den NoortgateW, de BolleM, de Fruyt F. Childhood personality pathology: dimensional stability and change. Dev Psychopathol 2009;21:853-69.
110. Franz M, Lieberz K, Schmitz N, Schepank H. A decade of spontaneous long-term course of psychogenic impairment in a community population sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:651-6.
111. Roberts BW, DelVecchio WF. The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 2000;126:3-25.
112. Terraciano A,McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Intra-individual change in personality stability and age. J Res Pers 2010;44:31-7.
113. Derogatis LR, Lazarus L. SCL-90-R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In: Maruish ME, ed. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. New York: Hillsdale, 1974:217-48.
114. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson MM, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561-71.
115. Spielberger CD, Gosuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists, 1970.
116. Kiresuk TJ, Lund SH. Goal attainment scaling: research, evaluation and utilization. In: Schulberg HC, Baker F, eds. Program evaluation in health fields, vol. 2. New York: Human Science, 1979.
117. Rudolf G. Ein psychoanalytisch fundiertes Instrument zur Patient Selbstschätzung. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatischen Medizin 1991;37:350-60.
118. Luborsky L. Clinician's judgments of mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1962;7:407-17.
119. HamiltonM. A rating scale for depression. JNeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56-62.
120. Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. B J Med Psychol 1959;32:50-5.
121. GuyW. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, 1976.
122. HorowitzLM, Strauss B, Kordy H. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. 2nd ed. Göttingen: Beltz, 2000.
123. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1997.
124. Jacobsen NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D. Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther 1984;15:336-52.
125. Jacobsen NS, Roberts LJ, Berns SB, McGlinchey JB. Methods of defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects. Description, application, and alternatives. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67:300-7.
126. Jacobsen NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:12-9.
127. DeWitt KN, Hartley DE, Rosenberg SE, Zilberg NJ, Wallerstein RS. Scales of Psychological Capacities: development of an assessment approach. Psychoanal Contemp Thought 1991;14:343-61.
128. Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 1: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessmentmethod. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:258-72.
129. Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 2: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:273-85.
130. Antonovsky A. Unravelling the mystery of health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
131. Weissman M, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33:1111-5.
132. Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klochars M. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997;23(suppl 1):49-57.
133. Lehtinen V, Joukaama,M, Jyrkinen T, et al. Mental health and mental disorders in the Finnish adult population [in Finnish, with English summary]. Turku/Helsinki: Publications of the Social Insurance Institution, 1991.
134. George C, Kaplan M, Main M. Adult Attachment Interview. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.