Course of improvement over 2 years in psychoanalytic and psychodynamic outpatient psychotherapy

Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-68

  Puschner, Bernd ^a   Kraft, Susanne ^b   Kächele, Horst ^a   Kordy, Hans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33947651693     PISSN: 14760835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/147608306X107593     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325-366). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Barkham, M., Connell, J., Stiles, W. B., Miles, J. N. V., Margison, F., Evans, C., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2006). Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 160-167.
3. Bassler, M., Potratz, B., & Krauthauser, H. (1995). Der Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) von Luborsky: Möglichkeiten zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Prozesses von stationärer Psychotherapie [Luborsky's HAQ: Possibilities to evaluate the therapeutic process in inpatient psychotherapy]. Psychotherapeut, 40, 23-32.
4. Beutler, L. E., Malik, M., Alimohamed, S., Harwood, T. M., Talebi, H., Noble, S., & Wong, E. (2004). Therapist variables. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 227-306). New York City: Wiley.
5. Brähler, E., & Scheer, J. W. (1995). Der Gießener Beschwerdebogen (GBB) (Testmappe mit 2., ergänzter und revidierter Auflage des Handbuchs) [The Gießen complaints questionnaire]. Bern: Huber.
6. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
7. Derogatis, L. R. (1986). SCL-90-R: Self Report Symptom Inventory. In Collegium Internationale Psychiatriae Scalarum (Ed.), Internationale Skalen für Psychiatrie. Weinheim: Beltz.
8. Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Wilk, D., & Kreutel, K. (1986). Multimodale Erfassung der Lebenszufriedenheit: Eine Untersuchung an Herz-Kreislauf-Patienten [Multimodal assessment of life satisfaction: A study of cardio-vascular patients]. Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie, 36, 347-354.
9. Fonagy, P., Jones, E. E., Kächele, H., Krause, R., Clarkin, J. F., Perron, R. G. A., Gerbev, A., & Allisou, E. (2002). An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (2nd Rev. ed.). London: Research Committee of the International Psychoanalytical Association.
10. Fonagy, P., Kächele, H., Krause, R., Jones, E., Perron, R., & Lopez, D. (1999). An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (1st ed.). London: Research Committee of the International Psychoanalytical Association.
11. Frank, J. D. (1971). Therapeutic factors in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 25, 350-361.
12. Franke, G. H. (1995). Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis-Deutsche Version [Derogatis' symptom checklist-German version]. Göttingen: Beltz Test.
13. Haas, E., Hill, R. D., Lambert, M. J., & Morrell, B. (2002). Do early responders to psychotherapy maintain treatment gains? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1157-1172.
14. Howard, K. I., Kopta, S., Krause, M., & Orlinsky, D. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, 159-164.
15. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 59, 12-19.
17. Kordy H., & Hannöver, W. (2000). Die Evaluation von Psychotherapie und das Konzept der Klinisch bedeutsamen Veranderung [Evaluation of psychotherapy and the concept of clinically significant change]. In A.-R. Laireiter (Ed.), Diagnostik in der Psychotherapie. Wien, New York: Springer.
18. Kordy, H., Haug, S., & Percevic, R. (2006). Patients differ - A plea for individually tailored service allocation. European Eating Disorders Review, 14, 1-7.
19. Kraft, S., Puschner, B., Lambert, M. J., & Kordy, H. (2006). Medical utilization and treatment outcome in mid- and long-term outpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 241-249.
20. Lambert, M. J., Hannöver, W., Nisslmüller, K., Richard, M., & Kordy, H. (2002). Fragebogen zum Ergebnis von Psychotherapie: Zur Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Übersetzung des Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2) [Questionnaire on the results of psychotherapy: Reliability and validity of the German translation of the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2)]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 1, 40-47.
21. Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S., & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1208-1216.
22. Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Lueger, R. J., Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Anderson, E. E., & Grissom, G. (2001). Assesssing treatment progress of individual patients using expected treatment response models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 150-158.
24. Lueger, R. J., Saunders, S. M., Howard, K. I., Vessey, J. T., & Nunez, P. R. (1999). Entering psychotherapy. In N. E. Miller & K. M. Margruder (Eds.), Cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy (pp. 63-71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, K. D. (2000). Relation of therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.
26. National Institute of Mental Health. (1999). Bridging science and service: A report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council's Clinical Treatment and Services Research workgroup. Retrieved April 7, 2004, from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/bridge.htm.
27. Percevic, R., Lambert, M. J., & Kordy, H. (2006). What is the predictive value of responses to psychotherapy for its future course? Empirical explorations and consequences for outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 364-373.
28. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Rudolf, G. (1991). Free University of Berlin: Berlin Psychotherapy Study. In L. E. Beutler & M. Crago (Eds.), Psychotherapy Research. An International Review of Programmatic Studies (pp. 185-193). Washington: American Psychological Association.
31. Rudolf, G., Manz, R., & Ori, C. (1994). Ergebnisse der psychoanalytischen Therapien [Outcomes of psychoanalytic therapies]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychoanalyse, 40, 25-40.
32. Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., & Lazar, A. (2002). Time matters: On the temporal interactions in long-term follow-up of long-term psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 39-59.
33. Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carlsson, J., Broberg, J., & Schubert, J. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: A review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project (STOPPP). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 921-942.
34. Schepank, H. (1995). Der Beeinträchtigungs-Schwere-Score: Ein Instrument zur Bestimmung der Schwere einer psychogenen Erkrankung [The Impairment Score: An instrument to determine the severity of mental illness]. Göttingen: Beltz.
35. World Health Organisation. (1993). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F) [International classification of mental disorders: ICD-10, chapter V (F)] (2nd ed.). Bern, Göttingen, Toronto, Seattle: Huber.