Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 300-307

  Jacobson, Neil S ^a   Roberts, Lisa J ^b   Berns, Sara B ^b   McGlinchey, Joseph B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLINICAL TRIALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOTHERAPY; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0033025583     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.300     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Barlow, D. H. (1981). On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 147-155.
2. Barlow, D. H., & Mavissakalian, M. (1981). Directions in the assessment and treatment of phobia: The next decade. In M. Mavissakalian & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Phobia: Psychological and pharmacological treatments. New York: Guilford Press.
3. Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17, 305-308.
4. Elkin, I., Shea, M. T., Watkins, J. T., Imber, S. D., Sotsky, S. M., Collins, J. F., Glass, D. R., Pilkonis, P. A., Leber, W. R., Docherty, J. P., Fiester, S. J., & Parloff, M. B. (1989). National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: General effectiveness of treatments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 971-982.
5. Falloon, I. R. H. (1981). Communication and problem-solving skills training with relapsing schizophrenics and their families. In M. R. Lansky (Ed.), Family therapy and major psychopathology (pp. 35-56). New York: Grune & Stratton.
6. Follette, W. C., & Callaghan, G. M. (1996). The importance of the principle of clinical significance-Defining significant to whom and for what purpose: A response to Tingey, Lambert, Burlingame, and Hansen. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 133-143.
7. Hageman, W. J., & Arrindell, W. A. (in press). Establishing clinically significant change: Increment of precision and the distinction between individual and group level of analysis. Behavior Research and Therapy.
8. Hawley, D. R. (1995). Assessing change with preventive interventions: The reliable change index. Family Relations, 44, 278-284.
9. Hollon, S. D., & Flick, S. N. (1988). On the meaning and methods of clinical significance. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 197-206.
10. Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M. S., & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678-685,
11. Hsu, L. M. (1989). Reliable changes in psychotherapy: Taking into account regression toward the mean. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 459-467.
12. Jacobson, N. S., & Addis, M. E. (1993). Research on couples and couple therapy: What do we know? Where are we going? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 85-93.
13. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.
14. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1986). Toward a standard definition of clinically significant change. Behavior Therapy, 77, 308-311.
15. Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., Revenstorf, D., Baucom, D. H., Hahlweg, K., & Margolin, G. (1984). Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral martial therapy: A reanalysis of data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 497-504.
16. Jacobson, N. S., & Revenstorf, D. (1988). Statistics for assessing the clinical significance of psychotherapy techniques: Issues, problems, and new developments. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 133-145.
17. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
18. Jacobson, N. S., Wilson, L., & Tupper, C. (1988). The clinical significance of treatment gains resulting from exposure-based interventions for agoraphobia: A reanalysis of outcome data. Behavior Therapy 19, 539-554.
19. Jansson, L., & Ost, L. (1982). Behavioral treatments for agoraphobia: An evaluative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 2, 311-336.
20. Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification 1, 427-452.
21. Kazdin, A. E., & Wilson, G. T. (1978). Evaluation of behavior therapy: Issues, evidence, and research strategies. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
22. Kendall, P. C., & Norton-Ford, J. D. (1982). Therapy outcome research methods. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 429-460). New York: Wiley.
23. Martinovich, Z., Saunders, S., & Howard, K. I. (1996). Some comments on assessing clinical significance. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 124-132.
24. McGlinchey, J. B., & Jacobson, N. S. (in press). Clinically significant but impractical? A response to Hageman and Arrindell. Behavior Research and Therapy.
25. McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4, 293-307.
26. Mental health: Does therapy help? (1995, November). Consumer Reports, 734-739.
27. Nietzel, M. T., & Trull, T. J. (1988). Meta-analytic approaches to social comparisons: A method for measuring clinical significance. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 159-169.
28. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. S. (1996). Assessing outcome in clinical practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Sawyer, J. D. (1995). Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 321-326.
30. Roberts, L. J., Neal, D. J., Kivlahan, D. R., Baer, J. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1998, July). Clinical versus statistical significance of reductions in college student drinking. Paper presented at the meeting of the World Congress of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Acapulco, Mexico.
31. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
33. Speer, D. C. (1992). Clinically significant change: Jacobson and Truax (1991) revisited. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 60, 402-408.
34. Speer, D. C. (1998). Mental health outcome evaluation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Speer, D. C., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995). Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: Support for an individual growth curve approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 1044-1048.
36. Strupp, H. H., & Hadley, S. W. (1977). A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcomes: With special reference to the negative effects of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 32, 187-196.
37. Tingey, R. C., Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. B. (1996). Clinically significant change: Practical indicators for evaluating psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 144-153.
38. Wampold, B. E., & Jenson, W. R. (1986). Clinical significance revisited. Behavior Therapy, 17, 302-305.
39. Wolf, M. M. (1977). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.