A successful trial utilizing the Leuzinger-Bohleber methodology for evaluation of psychoanalytic treatment: Preliminary report

International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1425-1440

  Ramonet Rasćon, Socorro ^a   Cuevas Corona, Pablo ^a   Lartigue, Teresa ^a   Mendoza Rios, Josefina ^a   López Garza, David ^a  

^a NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Leuzinger Boheleber psychoanalytic research methodology; Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy outcome research; Psychoanalytic research methodology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PANIC; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TAPE RECORDER;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC INTERPRETATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27244453134     PISSN: 00207578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1516/2GRH-9HUQ-RFAV-N95V     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Derogatis L, Lazarus L (1994). SCL-90-R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment, p. 217-48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Dewitt KN, Hartley D, Rosenberg SE, Zilberg NJ, Wallerstein RS (1991). Scales of Psychological Capacities: Development of an assessment approach. Psychoanal Contemp Thought 14: 334-43.
3. Huber D, Klug G, von Rad M (2002). The Munich Psychotherapy Study: A process-outcome comparison between psychoanalyses and psychodynamic psychotherapies. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Target M, editors. Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment, p. 223-39. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
4. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Stuhr U, Rüger B, Beutel M (2003). How to study the 'quality of psychoanalytic treatments' and their long-term effects on patients' well-being: A representative, multi-perspective follow-up study. Int J Psychoanal 84:263-90.
5. Pfeffer AZ (1961). Follow-up study of a satisfactory analysis. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 9:698-718.
6. Rudolf G, Grande T, Dilg R, Jakobsen T, Keller W, Oberbracht C, et al. (2002). Structural changes in psychoanalytic therapies - The Heidelberg-Berlin Study on long-term psychoanalytic therapies (PAL). In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Target M, editors. Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment, p. 201-22. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
7. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A, Carlsson J, Broberg J, Schubert J (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. Int J Psychoanal 82:205-10.
8. Wallerstein R (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. Int J Psychoanal 71:3-20.
9. Wallerstein R (1991). Assessment of structural change in psychoanalytic therapy and research. In: Shapiro T, editor. The concept of structure in psychoanalysis, p. 241-61. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
10. Weissman M, Bothwell S (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archiv Gen Psychiatry 33:1111-15.