Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 145-156

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Weigelt, Matthias ^b,c  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b Max Planck Inst Hum Cogn/BS   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GOALS; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 14544274187     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.145     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. De Jong, R. (2000). An intonation-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12, 493-498.
3. Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R. B., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Cohen, A. (2003). Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 64-77.
4. Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347-356.
5. Hazeltine, E., Diedrichsen, J., Kennerly, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not to specification motor parameters. Psychological Research, 67, 56-70.
6. Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83-98.
7. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 869-937.
8. James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
9. Kelso, J. A. S. (1984). Phase transition and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 246, R1000-R1004.
10. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
11. Kossyln, S. M., Cave, C. B., Provost, A. D., & von Gierke, S. M. (1988). Sequential processes in image generation. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 319-343.
12. Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67, 153-159.
13. Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica, 109, 137-155.
14. Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 87-106.
15. Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73.
16. Mechsner, F., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Do muscles matter for bimanual coordination? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 490-503.
17. Mohr, W. (1982). Visuelle Wahrnehmug und Zeichenfunktion. [Visual perception and the function of signs]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer Verlag.
18. Obhi, S. S., & Haggard, P. (2004). The relative effects of external spatial and motoric factors on the bimanual coordination of discrete movements. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 399-402.
19. Perrig, S., Kazzenikov, O., & Wiesendanger, M. (1999). Time structure of goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraint. Behavioural Brain Research, 103, 95-104.
20. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
21. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of movement (pp. 231-272). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. D., Jorgensen, M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Sanders, A. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
25. Serrien, W. J., & Wiesendanger, M. (2000). Temporal control of a bimanual task in patients with cerebellar dysfunctions. Neuropsychologia, 38, 558-565.
26. Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207-227.
27. Swinnen, P. S., Jardin, K., Verschueren, S., Meulenbroek, R., Franz, L., Dounskaia, N., & Walter, C. B. (1998). Exploring interlimb constraints during bimanual graphic performance: Effects of muscle grouping and direction. Behavioural Brain Research, 90, 79-87.
28. Winer, D. R., Brown, K. M., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2002). Directing attention to movement effects enhances motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660.