Protein WISDOM: A workbench for in silico de novo design of bioMolecules

Journal of Visualized Experiments

Volumn , Issue 77, 2013, Pages

  Smadbeck, James ^a   Peterson, Meghan B ^a   Khoury, George A ^a   Taylor, Martin S ^a   Floudas, Christodoulos A ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acids; And proteins; Binding affinity; Biochemistry; Bioengineering; Biomedical engineering; Chemical engineering; Computational biology; De novo protein and peptide design; Drug design; Fold specificity; Genomics; In silico sequence selection; Molecular biology; Optimization; Optimization (mathematics); Peptides; Protein; Protein binding; Proteomics; Sequencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880843785     PISSN: 1940087X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3791/50476     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Drexler, K. Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 5275-5278 (1981).
2. Pabo, C. Molecular technology: Designing proteins and peptides. Nature. 301, 200 (1983).
3. Floudas, C.A. Research challenges, opportunities and synergism in systems engineering and computational biology. AIChE J. 51, 1872-1884 (2005).
4. Fung, H.K., Welsh, W.J., & Floudas, C.A. Computational de novo peptide and protein design: Rigid templates versus flexible templates. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 (4), 993-1001 (2008).
5. Ponder, J. & Richards, F. Tertiary templates for proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 193, 775-791 (1987).
6. Dahiyat, B.I. & Mayo, S.L. Protein design automation. Protein Sci. 5, 895-903 (1996).
7. Dahiyat, B.I., Gordon, D.B., & Mayo, S.L. Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices. Protein Sci. 6, 1333-1337 (1997).
8. Su, A. & Mayo, S.L. Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design. Protein Sci. 6, 1701-1707 (1997).
9. Desjarlais, J. & Handel, T. Side chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. J. Mol. Biol. 290, 305-318 (1999).
10. Farinas, E., Regan, L. The de novo design of a rubredoxin-like Fe site. Protein Sci. 7, 1939-1946 (1998).
11. Harbury, P.B., Plecs, J.J., Tidor, B., Alber, T., & Kim, P.S. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science. 282, 1462-1467 (1998).
12. Koehl, P. & Levitt, M. De novo protein design: I. In search of stability and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 1161-1181 (1999).
13. Koehl, P. & Levitt, M. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 1183-1193 (1999).
14. Kuhlman, B., Dantae, G., Ireton, G., Verani, G., Stoddard, B., & Baker, D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science. 302, 1364-1368 (2003).
15. Klepeis, J.L., Floudas, C.A., et al. Integrated structural, computational and experimental approach for lead optimization: Design of compstatin variants with improved activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 8422-8423 (2003).
16. Klepeis J.L., Floudas C.A., Morikis D., Tsokos C.G., & Lambris J.D. Design of peptide analogs with improved activity using a novel de novo protein design approach. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 3817-3826 (2004).
17. Fung H.K., Floudas C.A., Taylor M.S., Zhang L., & Morikis D. Toward full-sequence de novo protein design with flexible templates for human beta-defensin-2. Biophys. J. 94, 584-599 (2008).
18. Bellows M.L., Fung H.K., Floudas C.A., López de Victoria A., & Morikis D. New compstatin variants through two de novo protein design frameworks. Biophys. J. 98 (10), 2337-2346 (2010).
19. López de Victoria, A., Gorham Jr, R.D., et al. A new generation of potent complement inhibitors of the compstatin family. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 77, 431-440 (2011).
20. Tamamis, P., López de Victoria, A., et al. Molecular dynamics in drug design: New generations of compstatin analogs. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 79 (5), 703-718 (2012).
21. Bellows-Peterson M.L., Fung H.K., et al. De novo peptide design with c3a receptor agonist and antagonist activities: Theoretical predictions and experimental validation. J. Med. Chem. 55 (9), 4159-4168 (2012).
22. Bellows, M.L., Taylor, M.S., et al. Discovery of entry inhibitors for HIV-1 via a new de novo protein design framework. Biophys. J. 99, 3445-3453 (2010).
23. Sun J.-J., Abdeljabbar D.M., Clarke N.L., Bellows M.L., Floudas C.A., & Link A.J. Reconstitution and engineering of apoptotic protein interactions on the bacterial cell surface. J. Mol. Biol. 394, 297-305 (2009).
24. Smadbeck J., Bellows-Peterson M.L., et al. De novo protein design and validation of histone methyltranferase inhibitors., In Preparation, (2013).
25. Bellows, M.L., Fung, H.K., Floudas, C.A. In: Molecular Systems Engineering, Process Systems Engineering., Adjiman, C.S. & Galindo, A., eds., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 6, 207-232 (2010).
26. α distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set. Proteins. 65, 726-741 (2006).
27. Rajgaria, R., McAllister, S.R., & Floudas, C.A. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys. Proteins. 70, 950-970 (2008).
28. Fung H.K., Taylor M.S., & Floudas C.A. Novel formulations for the sequence selection problem in de novo protein design with flexible templates. Optim. Method. Softw. 22, 51-71 (2007).
29. Fung H.K., Rao S., Floudas C.A., Prokopyev O., Pardalos P.M., & Rendl F. Computational comparison studies of quadratic assignment like formulations for the in silico sequence selection problem in de novo protein design. J. Comb. Optim. 10, 41-60 (2005).
30. CPLEX Using the CPLEX Callable Library, ILOG, Inc., (1997).
31. Klepeis J.L. & Floudas C.A. Free energy calculations for peptides via deterministic global optimization. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7491-7512 (1999).
32. Klepeis J.L., Floudas C.A., Morikis D., & Lambris J.D. Predicting peptide structures using NMR data and deterministic global optimization. J. Comput. Chem. 20, 1354-1370 (1999).
33. Klepeis J.L., Schafroth H.D., Westerberg K.M., & Floudas C.A. Deterministic global optimization and ab initio approaches for the structure prediction of polypeptides, dynamics of protein folding and protein-protein interactions. Adv. Chem. Phys. 120, 265-457 (2002).
34. Klepeis J.L. & Floudas C.A. Ab initio prediction of helical segments of polypeptides. J. Comput. Chem. 23, 246-266 (2002).
35. Klepeis J.L. & Floudas C.A. Prediction of beta-sheet topology and disulfide bridges in polypeptides. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 191-208 (2003).
36. Klepeis J.L. & Floudas C.A. ASTRO-FOLD: A combinatorial and global optimization framework for ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Biophys. J. 85, 2119-2146 (2003).
37. Klepeis J.L., Pieja M.T., & Floudas C.A. A new class of hybrid global optimization algorithms for peptide structure prediction: Integrated hybrids. Comput. Phys. Commun. 151, 121-140 (2003).
38. Klepeis J., Pieja M., & Floudas C. Hybrid global optimization algorithms for protein structure prediction: Alternating hybrids. Biophys. J. 84, 869-882 (2003b).
39. Klepeis J.L. & Floudas C.A. Analysis and prediction of loop segments in protein structures. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29, 423-436 (2005).
40. Mönnigmann M. and Floudas C.A. Protein loop structure prediction with flexible stem geometries. Proteins. 61, 748-762 (2005).
41. McAllister S.R., Mickus B.E., Klepeis J.L., & Floudas C.A. A novel approach for alpha-helical topology prediction in globular proteins: Generation of interhelical restraints. Proteins. 65, 930-952 (2006).
42. Floudas, C.A., Fung, H.K., McAllister, S.R., Mönnigmann, M., & Rajgaria, R. Advances in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design: A review. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 966-988 (2006).
43. Subramani A., Wei Y., & Floudas C.A. ASTRO-FOLD 2.0: An enhanced framework for protein structure prediction. AIChE J. 58 (5), 1619-1637 (2012).
44. Wei Y., Thompson J., & Floudas C.A. Concord: a consensus method for protein secondary structure prediction via mixed integer linear optimization. P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy. 468, 831-850 (2011).
45. Subramani A. & Floudas C.A. β-sheet topology prediction with high precision and recall for β and mixed α/β proteins. PLoS One. 7 (3), e32461 (2012).
46. Rajgaria R., Wei Y., & Floudas C.A. Contact prediction for beta and alpha-beta proteins using integer linear optimization and its impact on the first principles 3D structure prediction method ASTRO-FOLD. Proteins. 78 (8), 1825-1846 (2010).
47. Subramani A. & Floudas C.A. Structure prediction of loops with fixed and flexible stems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 116 (23), 6670-6682 (2012).
48. Güntert P., Mumenthaler C., & Wüthrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 283-298 (1997).
49. Güntert P. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol. Biol. 278, 353-378 (2004).
50. Ponder J. TINKER, software tools for molecular design. 1998, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine: St. Louis, MO., (1998).
51. Cornell W.D., Cieplak P., et al. A 2nd generation forcefield for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179-5197 (1995).
52. Lilien R.H., Stevens B.W., Anderson A.C., & Donald B.R. A novel ensemble-based scoring and search algorithm for protein redesign and its application to modify the substrate specificity of the gramicidin synthetase a phenylalanine adenylation enzyme. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 740-761 (2005).
53. Lee M.R., Baker D., & Kollman P.A. 2.1 and 1.8 A°Cα RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and S15. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (6), 1040-1046 (2001).
54. Rohl C.A. & Baker D. De novo determination of protein backbone structure from residual dipolar couplings using rosetta. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (11), 2723-2729 (2002).
55. Rohl C.A., Strauss C.E.M., Misura K.M.S., & Baker D. Protein structure prediction using rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383, 66-93 (2004).
56. DiMaggio P.A., McAllister S.R., Floudas C.A., Feng X.J., Rabinowitz J.D., & Rabitz H.A. Biclustering via optimal re-ordering of data matrices in systems biology: Rigorous methods and comparative studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 9 (458), (2008).
57. DiMaggio P.A., McAllister S.R., Floudas C.A., Feng X.J., Rabinowitz J.D., & Rabitz H.A. A network flow model for biclustering via optimal re-ordering of data matrices. J Global Optimization. 47 (3), 343-354 (2010).
58. Daily M.D., Masica D., Sivasubramanian A., Somarouthu S., & Gray J.J. CAPRI rounds 3-5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock. Proteins. 60, 181-186 (2005).
59. Gray J.J., Moughon S., et al. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 281-299 (2003).
60. Gray J.J., Moughon S.E., et al. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins. 52, 118-122 (2003).
61. Kuhlman B. & Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 10383-10388 (2000).
62. Jmol: an open-source java viewer for chemical structures in 3d. http://www.jmol.org/(2013).