Establishing collaborations in design-based research projects: Insights from the origins of the MMAP project

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 1, 2008, Pages 216-223

  Engle, Randi A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TEAMS; DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; TEACHING PRACTICES;

RESEARCH;

CURRICULA;

EID: 84880436530     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
2. Cobb, P., Wood, T. & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on teaching and learning mathematics (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 4, pp. 125-146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
4. Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
5. Design-based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-9.
6. D'Amico, L. (2005). The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools: A case of design-based research in education. Technical report for the MacArthur and Spencer Foundation Meta-study on projects that sought to reconfigure the usual relationships between research and practice. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research & Development Center, Univ. of Pittsburgh. Found at: http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/metastudy/PDF/LeTUS-Final2006.pdf
7. Engle, R. A. (2006). Engaging diverse stakeholders in innovative curriculum design and research: The case of the Middle-school Mathematics through Applications Project (1990-2002). Technical report for the MacArthur and Spencer Foundation Meta-study on projects that sought to reconfigure the usual relationships between research and practice. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research & Development Center, Univ. of Pittsburgh. Found at: http://www.lrdc.pitt. edu/metastudy/PDF/MMAPCase0706.pdf
8. Engle, R. A. & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
9. Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R. & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Engle, R. A. & Faux, R. B. (2006). Towards productive disciplinary engagement of prospective teachers in educational psychology: Comparing two methods of case-based instruction. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1(2).
11. Goldman, S. & Knudsen, J. (2004). Principles for making middle school math more equitable. Classroom Leadership, 7(6). Found at: http://www.acsd.org/ publications/class-lead/200403/goldman.html.
12. Goldman, S., Knudsen J., & Latvala, M. (1998). Engaging middle schoolers in and through real-world mathematics. In L. Leutzinger (Ed.), Mathematics in the middle (pp. 129-140). Reston, VA: NCTM.
13. Greeno, J. G., McDermott, R., Cole, K., Engle, R. A., Goldman, S., Knudsen, J., Lauman, B., & Linde, C. (1999). Research, reform, and aims in education: Modes of action in search of each other. In E. Lagemann & L. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 299-335). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2002). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
15. Hindin, A., Morocco, C.C., Mott, E.A., & Aguilar, C.M. (2007). More than just a group: Teacher collaboration and learning in the workplace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 349-376.
16. Lichtenstein, G., Weissglass, J., & Ercikan-Alper, K. (1998). Final evaluation report: Middle-school Mathematics through Applications Project, MMAP II (1994-1998). Denver, CO: Quality Evaluation Designs.
17. Lieberman, A. & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98, 7-45.
18. Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. McDonald, J. P. & Klein, E. J. (2003). Networking for teacher learning: Toward a theory of effective design. Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1606-1621.
20. Palincsar, A., and Magnussen., S. J., Marano, N., Ford, D. & Brown, N. (2001). Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 5-19.
21. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A. & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 17-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S. S. & Yamauchi, L. (2000). Teaching transofmred: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23. Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O. & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21-32.
24. Wood, D. (2007). Teachers' learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo? Teachers College Record, 109(3), 699-739.