Variation and evolution of herkogamy in Exochaenium (Gentianaceae): Implications for the evolution of distyly

Annals of Botany

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 95-102

  Kissling, Jonathan ^a,b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distyly; Exochaenium; floral evolution; Gentianaceae; herkogamy; heterostyly; phylogeny

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; CHLOROPLAST; DICOTYLEDON; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWERING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; MOTH; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN;

AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHLOROPLAST; DISTYLY; EVOLUTION; EXOCHAENIUM; FLORAL EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENTIANACEAE; HERKOGAMY; HETEROSTYLY; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DISTYLY; EXOCHAENIUM; FLORAL EVOLUTION; GENTIANACEAE; HERKOGAMY; HETEROSTYLY; PHYLOGENY;

AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHLOROPLASTS; FLOWERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENTIANACEAE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION;

EID: 84880212281     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct097     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baker HG. 1966. The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 20: 349-368.
2. Barrett SCH. 1989. The evolutionary breakdown ofheterostyly. In: Linhart Y, Bock J. eds. The evolutionary ecology ofplants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 151-169.
3. Barrett SCH. 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Barrett SCH. 2002. Sexual inter ference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159.
5. Barrett SCH, Shore JS. 1987. Variation and evolution ofbreeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). Evolution. 41: 340-354.
6. Barrett SCH, Shore JS. 2008. New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In: Franklin-Tong V. ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3-32.
7. Barrett SCH, Morgan MT, Husband BC. 1989. Dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhorniapaniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43: 1398-1416.
8. Barrett SCH, Ness RW, Vallejo-Maŕn M. 2009. Evolutionary pathways to self-fertilization in a tristylous species. New Phytologist 183: 546-556.
9. Breese EL. 1959. Selection for differing degrees of out-breeding in Nicotiana rustica. Annals of Botany 23:331-344.
10. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1979a. A model for the evolution ofdistyly. American Naturalist 114: 467-498.
11. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1979b. The maintenance and breakdown of distyly. American Naturalist 114: 499-513.
12. Cohen JI. 2010. 'A case to which no parallel exists': the influence of Darwin's Different Forms of Flowers. American Journal of Botany 97: 701-716.
13. Cohen JI, Litt A, Davis JI. 2012. Comparative floral development in Lithospermum (Boraginaceae) and implications for the evolution and devel-opment ofheterostyly. American Journal of Botany 99: 797-805.
14. Darwin CR. 1877. The differentforms offlowers onplants of the same species. London: John Murray
15. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Faegri K, van de Pijl L. 1971. The principles of pollination ecology. Oxford: Pergamon.
17. Ferrero V, Arroyo J, Vargas P., Thompson JD, Navarro L. 2009. Evolutionary transitions of style polymorphisms in Lithodora (Boraginaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11: 111-125.
18. Forrest JRK, Ogilvie JE, Gorischek AM, Thomson JD. 2011. Seasonal change in a pollinator community and the maintenance of style length variation in Mertensia fusiformis (Boraginaceae).Annalsof Botany 108: 1-12.
19. Fulton M, Hodges SA. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266: 2247-2252.
20. Ganders FR. 1979. The biology ofheterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 607-635.
21. Gilg E. 1895. Gentianaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K. eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4. Leipzig: Verlag con Wilhem Engelmann, 50-180.
22. Graham SW, Barrett SCH. 2004. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany91: 1007-1021.
23. Grant V, Grant KA. 1965. Flower pollination in the phloxfamily. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Hill AW. 1908. Notes on Sebaea and Exochaenium. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens, Kew) 1908: 317-341.
25. Hill AW. 1913. The floral morphology of the genus Sebaea. Annals of Botany 27: 479-490.
26. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference ofphylo-genetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
27. Kissling J. 2012. Taxonomy of Exochaenium and Lagenias: two resurrected genera of tribe Exaceae (Gentianaceae). Systematic Botany 37: 238-253.
28. Kissling J, Yuan Y-M, Küpfer P, Mansion G. 2009a. The polyphyletic genus Sebaea (Gentianaceae): a step forward in understanding the morphological and karyological evolution of the Exaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 734-748.
29. Kissling J, Endress PK, Bernasconi G. 2009b. Ancestral and monophyletic presence of diplostigmaty in Sebaea (Gentianaceae) and its potential role as a morphological mixed mating strategy. New Phytologist 184: 303-310.
30. Kulbaba MW, Worley AC 2012. Selection on floral design in Polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae): femaleandmalefitnessunderhawkmothpol-lination. Evolution66: 1344-1359.
31. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992a. The evolution ofheterostyly. In: Barrett SCH. ed. Evolutionandfunctionofheterostyly. Berlin: Springer, 151-178.
32. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. Barrett SCH. ed. Evolutionandfunctionofheterostyly. Berlin: Springer, 179-208.
33. Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2000. Mac Clade 4: analysis ofphylogeny and characterevolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
34. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2011. Mesquite: a modular systemfor evolution-ary analysis. Version 2.75; http://mesquiteproject.org.
35. Naiki A. 2012. Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidiza-tion. Plant Species Biology 27: 3-29.
36. Nemomissa S. 2002. Gentianaceae. In: Beentje HJ, Smith SAL. eds. Flora of tropical East Africa. Rotterdam: AABalkema, 1-68.
37. Nylander JAA. 2004. Mr Modeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden. http://www.abc.se/ ~nylander/.
38. Ornduff R. 1974. Heterostyly in South African flowering plants: a conspectus. Journal of South African Botany 40: 169-187.
39. Pagel M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612-622.
40. Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings ofthe Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 255: 37-45.
41. Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2004. Convergent evolution of flower polymorphism in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). New Phytologist 161: 235-252.
42. Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J. 2006. New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytologist 171: 553-567.
43. Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phyloge-netics: advantages of the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
44. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitu-tion. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
45. Raynal A. 1967. Sur un Sebaea africain saprophyte (Gentianaceae). Adansonia sér. 2 7: 207-219.
46. Riseman A, Sumanasinghe VA, Craig R. 2006. Cytology, crossability, and pollen fertility of Sri Lankan Exacum (Gentianaceae) and their hybrids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 191-199.
47. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. Mr Bayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic infer-ence under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
48. Schinz H. 1906. Beiträge zur Kentniss der Afrikanischen Flora. Gentianaceae. Bulletin del'Herbier Boissiersér. 2 6: 714-746.
49. Schoen DJ, Johnson MO, L'Heureux A, Marsolais JV. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaeae). Evolution 51: 1090-1099.
50. Takebayashi N, Wolf DE, Delph LF. 2006. Effect of variation in herkogamy on outcrossing within a population of Gilia achilleifolia. Heredity 96: 159-165.
51. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensi-tivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
52. Vallejo-Maŕn M, Barrett SCH. 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Annals of Botany 103: 951-962.
53. Vogel S. 1955. Uber den Blutendimorphismus einiger südafrikanischer Pflanzen. Osterreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 102: 486-500.
54. Webb CJ, Lloyd DG. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presen-tation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journalof Botany24: 163-178.
55. Weller SG. 1992. Evolutionary modifications of tristylous breeding systems. In: Barrett SCH. ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 247-272.
56. Weller SG. 2009. The different forms of flowers-what have we learned since Darwin?Botanical Journalofthe Linnean Society 160: 249-261.
57. Welwitsch F. 1869. Sertum angolense. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 27:47-49.
58. Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL. 2004. AWTY: a systemfor graph-icalexplorationof MCMCconvergencein Bayesianphylogeneticinference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty.
59. Wolfe LM, Massinga PH, Johnson SD. 2009. A quantitative evaluation of the distylous syndrome in Sebaea grandis (Gentianaceae). South African Journal of Botany 75: 785-790.
60. Yuan YM, Wohlhauser S, Moller M, et al. 2003. Monophyly and relationships of the tribe Exaceae (Gentianaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 500-517.