Selection on floral design in polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae): Female and male fitness under hawkmoth pollination

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1344-1359

  Kulbaba, Mason W ^a   Worley, Anne C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Herkogamy; Hyles gallii; Male fitness; Pollen movement; Selection gradients

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; FLOWER VISITING; GENETIC MARKER; HERMAPHRODITE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MOTH; NECTAR; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEED SET; SELECTION;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWER; GENETICS; HERMAPHRODITIC SPECIES; HISTOLOGY; MOTH; NECTAR; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEX RATIO;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; GENETIC FITNESS; HERMAPHRODITIC ORGANISMS; MOTHS; PLANT NECTAR; POLLINATION; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84860183704     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01536.x     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Alacórn, R. 2010. Congruence between visitation and pollen-transport networks in a California plant-pollinator community. Oikos 119:35-44.
2. Aldridge, G., and D. A. Campbell 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 61:99-110.
3. Alexandersson, R., and S. D. Johnson 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:631-636.
4. Arias-Coyotl, E., K. E. Stoner, and A. Cases 2006. Effectiveness of bats as pollinators of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in wild, managed in situ, and cultivated population in La Mixteca Baja, central Mexico. Am. J. Bot. 93:1675-1683.
5. Armbruster, W. S., L. Antonsen, and C. Pélabon 2005. Phenotypic selection on Dalechampia blossoms: honest signaling affects pollination success. Ecology 86:3323-3333.
6. Ashman, T. L. 1998. Is relative pollen production or removal a good predictor of relative male fitness? An experimental exploration with a wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana, Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85:1166-1171.
7. Ashman, T.-L., and M. T. Morgan 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:553-559.
8. Barrett, S. C. H., L. K. Jesson, and A. M. Baker 2000. The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 85(Suppl A):253-265.
9. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159.
10. Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 358:991-1004.
11. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
12. Beattie, A. J. 1971. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pac Entomol. 47:82.
13. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224:223-265.
14. Brodie, E. D., III. 1992. Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behaviour in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46:1284-1298.
15. Brunet, J. 2009. Pollinators of the Rocky Mountain columbine: temporal variation, functional groups and associations with floral traits. Ann. Bot. 103:1567-1578.
16. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43:318-334.
17. Campbell, D. R. 2009. Using phenotypic manipulations to study multivariate selection of floral traits associations. Ann. Bot. 103:1557-1566.
18. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467.
19. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
20. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and E. J. Meléndez-Ackerman 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am. Nat. 149:295-315.
21. Caruso, C. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomospis aggregata. Evolution 54:1546-1557.
22. Conner, J. K. 2006. Ecological genetics of floral evolution. Pp. 260-277 in L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford Univ. Press, New York
23. Conner, J. K., and S. Rush 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509-516.
24. Cresswell, J. E. 1998. Stabilising selection and the structural variability of flowers within species. Ann. Bot. 81:463-473.
25. Cresswell, J. E, and C. Galen 1991. Frequency-dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations: the pollination of Polemonium viscosum. Am. Nat. 138:1342-1353.
26. Delph, L. F., and T-L. Ashman 2006. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute? Int. Comp. Biol. 46:475-472.
27. Eisikowitch, D., and J. Galil 1971. Effect of Wind on the pollination of Pancratium maritimum L. (Amaryllidaceae) by hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 40:673-678.
28. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
29. Engel, E. G., and R. E. Irwin 2003. Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. Am. J. Bot. 90:1612-1618.
30. *Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Meth. 41:1149-1160.
31. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, P. Wilson, M. R. Dudash, and J. D. Thomson. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35:375-403.
32. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, and M. R. Dudash 2009. Specialization of flowers: is floral orientation an overlooked first step New Phytol. 183:868-879.
33. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis 2007. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol. 177:802-810.
34. Forrest, J. R. K., J. E. Ogilvie, A. M. Gorischeck, and J. D. Thomson 2011. Seasonal change in a pollinator community and the maintenance of style length variation in Mertensia fusiformis (Boraginaceae). Ann. Bot. 108:1-11.
35. Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43:882-890.
36. Galen, C. 1992. Pollen dispersal dynamics in an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 46:1043-1051.
37. Galen, C., and M. E. A. Newport 1987. Bumble bee behaviour and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74:20-23.
38. Glaettli, M., and S. C. H. Barrett 2008. Pollinator responses to variation in floral display and flower size in dioecious Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). New Phytol 179:1193-1201.
39. Goyret, J., M. Pfaff, R. A. Raguso, and A. Kelber 2008. Why do Manduca sexta feed from white flowers? Innate and learnt colors preferences in a hawkmoth. Naturwissenschaften 95:569-576.
40. Grant, V. 1983. The systematic and geographic distribution of hawkmoth flowers in the temperate North American flora. Bot. Gaz. 144:439-449.
41. Grant, V. 1985. Additional observations on temperate North American hawkmoth flowers. Bot. Gaz. 146:517-520.
42. Harder, L. D., and M. A. Aizen 2010. Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365:529-543.
43. Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:315-320.
44. Harder, L. D., C. Y. Jordan, W. E. Gross, and M. B. Routley 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biol. 19:137-148.
45. Hargreaves, A. L., L. D. Harder, and S. D. Johnson 2010. Native pollen thieves reduce the reproductive success of a hermaphroditic plant, Aloe maculata. Ecology 91:1693-1703.
46. Hereford, J., T. F. Hansen, and D. Houle 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong Evolution 58:2133-2143.
47. Hodgins, K. A., and S. C. H. Barrett 2008a. Asymmetrical mating patterns and the evolution of biased morph ratios in a tristylous daffodil. Genet. Res. 90:3-15.
48. Hodgins, K. A., and S. C. H. Barrett 2008b. Natural selection on floral traits through male and female function in wild populations of the heterostylous daffodil Narcissus triandrus. Evolution 62:1751-1763.
49. Hodges, S. A. 1995. The influence of nectar production on hawkmoth behavior, self pollination, and seed production in Mirabilis multiflora (Nyctaginaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:197-204.
50. Kaczorowski, R. L., T. E. Juenger, and T. P. Holtsford 2008. Heritability and correlation structure of nectar and floral morphology traits in Nicotiana alata. Evolution 62:1738-1750.
51. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16:1099-1006.
52. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inoyue 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Univ. Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado
53. Kessler, A., R. Halitschke, and K. Poveda 2011. Herbivory-mediated pollinator limitation: negative impacts of induced volatiles on plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 92:1769-1780.
54. Kingsolver, J. G., and D. W. Pfennig 2007. Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57:561-572.
55. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., T. J. deJong, and J. A. J. Metz 1994. Why plants can be too attractive-a discussion of measures to estimate male fitness. J. Ecol. 82:191-194.
56. Kobayashi, S., K. Inoue, and M. Kato 1999. Mechanisms of selection favoring a wide tubular corolla in Campanula punctata. Evolution 53:752-757.
57. Kulbaba, M. W., and A. C. Worley 2008. Floral design in Polemonium brandegeei (Polemoniaceae): genetic and phenotypic variation under hawkmoth and hummingbird pollination. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:509-522.
58. Kulbaba, M. W., and A. C. Worley 2011. Polymorphic microsatellite loci in Polemonium brandegeei and P. viscosum (section Melliosoma, Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 98:e4-e6.
59. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
60. Maad, J. 2000. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Plantanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54:112-123.
61. Maad, J., and R. Alexandersson 2004. Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J. Evol. Biol. 17:642-650.
62. McKenna M., and J. D. Thomson 1988. A technique for sampling and measuring small amounts of floral nectar. Ecology 69:1306-1307.
63. Meagher, T. R. 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am. Nat. 128:199-215.
64. Meléndez-Ackerman, E., D. R. Campbell, and N. M. Waser 1997. Hummingbird behaviour and mechanisms of selection on flower color in Ipomopsis. Ecology 78:2532-2541.
65. Mitchell, R. J., and R. J. Shaw 1993. Heritability of floral traits for the perennial wild flower Penstemon centranthifolius (Scrophulariaceae): clones and crosses. Heredity 71:185-192.
66. Morgan, M. T. 1992. The evolution of traits influencing male and female fertility in outcrossing plants. Am. Nat. 139:1022-1051.
67. Murcia, M. 1990. Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal in Ipomea trichocarpa. Ecology 71:1098-1109.
68. Nilsson, L. A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 384:147-149.
69. Nishizawa, T., Y. Watano, E. Kinoshita, T. Kawahara, and K. Ueda 2005. Pollen movement in a natural population of Arisaema serratum (Araceae), a plant with a pitfall-trap flower pollination system. Am. J. Bot. 92:1114-1123.
70. O'Connell, L. M., and M. O. Johnston 1998. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 79:1246-1260.
71. Parra-Tabla, V., and S. Bullock 2005. Ecological and selective effects of stigma-anther separation in the self-incompatible tropical tree Ipomoea wolcottiana (Convolvulaceae). Plant Syst and Evol 1-2:85-95.
72. Pernal, S. F., and R. W. Currie 2001. Improved flight and rearing room design for honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 94:793-805.
73. Raguso, R. A. 2008. Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39:549-569.
74. Raguso, R. A., and M. A. Willis 2003. Hawkmoth pollination in Arizona's Sonoran Desert: behavioral responses to floral traits. Pp. 43-65 in C. L. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich, eds. Evolution and ecology taking flight: butterflies as model systems. Rocky Mountain Biological Lab Symposium Series. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
75. Riffell, J. A., R. Alarcon, L. Abrell, G. Davidowitz, J. L. Bronstein, and J. G. Hildebrand 2008. Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth-flower interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:3404-3409.
76. Sahli, H. F., and J. K. Conner 2011. Testing for conflicting and nonadditive selection: floral adaptation to multiple pollinators through male and female fitness. Evolution 65:1457-1473.
77. Sánchez-Lafuente, A. M., J. Guitián, M. Medrano, C. M. Herrera, P. J. Rey, and X. Cerdá 2005. Plant traits, environmental factors, and pollinator visitation in winter-flowering Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Ann. Bot. 96:845-852.
78. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT, release 9.1.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
79. Schluter, D., and D. Nychka 1994. Exploring fitness landscapes. Am. Nat. 143:597-616.
80. Strakosh, S. C., and C. J. Ferguson 2005. Pollination biology of four southwestern species of Phlox (Polemoniaceae): insect visitation in relation to corolla tube length. Southwest. Nat. 50:291-301.
81. Sletvold, N., and J. Ågren 2010. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and spur length in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea. Int. J. Plant Sci 171:999-1009.
82. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York
83. Spaethe, J., J. Tautz, and L. Chittka 2001. Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behaviour. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3898-3903.
84. Thomson, J. D., and P. Wilson 2008. Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: convergence, divergence, and directionality. Int. J. Plant Sci 169:23-38.
85. Van Rossum, F., I. Stiers, A. Van Geert, L. Triest, and O. J. Hardy 2010. Fluorescent dye articles as pollen analogues for measuring pollen dispersal in an insect-pollinated forest herb. Oecologia. 165:663-674.
86. Vanhoenacker, D., P. Toräng, J. Ågren, and J. Ehrlen 2010. Morph-specific selection of floral traits in a polymorphic plant. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1251-1260.
87. Vaughton, G., and M. Ramsey 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurbea dioica. Oecologia 115:93-101.
88. Webb, C. J., and D. G. Lloyd 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. NZ J. Bot. 24:163-178.
89. Willmott, A. P., and A. Búrquez 1996. The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): can hawkmoths be trusted Am. J. Bot. 83:1050-1056.
90. Wilson, P., J. D. Thomson, M. L. Stanton, and L. P. Rigney 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 143:283-296.
91. Worldwide Butterflies. (accessed March 21, 2007).
92. Worley, A. C., and L. D. Harder 1996. Size-dependent resource allocation and costs of reproduction in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). J. Ecol. 84:195-206.