Ancestral and monophyletic presence of diplostigmaty in Sebaea (Gentianaceae) and its potential role as a morphological mixed mating strategy

New Phytologist

Volumn 184, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 303-310

  Kissling, Jonathan ^a   Endress, Peter K ^b   Bernasconi, Giorgina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Diplostigmaty; Evolution; Exaceae; Gentianaceae; Mixed mating; Phylogeny; Reproductive assurance; Sebaea

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

AUTOGAMY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; FLOWER; GENETICS; GENTIANACEAE; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION;

BAYES THEOREM; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FLOWERS; GENTIANACEAE; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION;

EXACEAE; GENTIANACEAE; SEBAEA;

EID: 70349479604     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03000.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3 : 274 284.
2. Baum H. 1948. Die Stellung der Samenanlagen am Karpell bei Asclepias syriaca, Cynanchum vincetoxicum und Erythraea centaurium. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 95 : 251 256.
3. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1978. Population-genetics of partial male-sterility and evolution of monoecy and dioecy. Heredity 41 : 137 153.
4. Endress PK. 2006. Angiosperm floral evolution: morphological developmental framework. Advances in Botanical Research 44 : 1 61.
5. Fallen ME. 1985. The gynoecial development and systematic position of Allamanda (Apocynaceae). American Journal of Botany 72 : 572 579.
6. Flaxman SM. 2000. The evolutionary stability of mixed strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 : 482 484.
7. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36 : 47 79.
8. Gregorius HR. 1982. Selection in plant-populations of effectively infinite size. 2. Protectedness of a biallelic polymorphism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 96 : 689 705.
9. Haccou P, Iwasa Y. 1995. Optimal mixed strategies in stochastic environments. Theoretical Population Biology 47 : 212 243.
10. Herlihy CR, Eckert CG. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416 : 320 323.
11. Hill AW. 1913. The floral morphology of the genus Sebaea. Annals of Botany 27 : 479 489.
12. Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. The American Naturalist 138 : 606 622.
13. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294 : 2310 2314.
14. Igersheim A, Buzgo M, Endress PK. 2001. Gynoecium diversity and systematics in basal monocots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136 : 1 65.
15. Ivey CT, Carr DE. 2005. Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). American Journal of Botany 92 : 1641 1649.
16. Jain SK. 1976. Evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7 : 469 495.
17. Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou P-O, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marín M, Winn AA. 2009. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. American Naturalist 137 : 1 11.
18. Kissling J 2007. Phylogenetics of tribe Exaceae (Gentianaceae) based on molecular, morphological and karyological data, with special emphasis on the genus Sebaea- taxonomic treatment of Exochaenium, Lagenias and the new genus Klackenbergia. PhD thesis, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
19. Kissling J, Zeltner L, Küpfer P, Mansion G. 2008. Cytogeography of Gentianaceae-Exaceae in Africa, with a special focus on Sebaea: the possible role of dysploidy and polyploidy in the evolution of the tribe. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 158 : 556 566.
20. Kissling J, Buerki S, Mansion G. 2009. Klackenbergia (Gentianaceae - Exaceae): a new endemic genus from Madagascar. Taxon 58 : in press.
21. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39 : 24 40. (Pubitemid 16276773)
22. Leinfellner W. 1951. Die Nachahmung der durch kongenitale Verwachsung entstandenen Formen des Gynözeums durch postgenitale Verschmelzungsvorgänge. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 98 : 403 411.
23. Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50 : 913 925.
24. Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113 : 67 79.
25. Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates.
26. Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2008. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 1.12. http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/ mesquite.html.
27. Marloth R. 1909. A diplostigmatic plant, Sebaea exacoides (L.) Schinz (Belmontia cordata L.). Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 1 : 311 314.
28. Matthews ML, Endress PK. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Crossosomatales (Crossosomataceae, Stachyuraceae, Staphyleaceae, Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae, Ixerbaceae, Strasburgeriaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147 : 1 46.
29. McCoy W. 1940. Floral organogenesis in Frasera carolinensis. American Journal of Botany 27 : 600 609.
30. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden.
31. Penet L, Collin CL, Ashman T-L. 2009. Florivory increases selfing: an experimental study in the wild strawberry, Fragaria virginiana. Plant Biology 11 : 38 45.
32. Porcher E, Lande R. 2005. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18 : 497 508.
33. Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53 : 793 808.
34. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 818.
35. Remizowa M, Sokoloff D, Kondo K. 2008. Floral evolution in the monocot family Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales): evidence from anatomy and development in Metanarthecium luteo-viride Maxim. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 158 : 1 18.
36. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 : 1572 1574.
37. Schinz H. 1906. Beiträge zur Kentniss der Afrikanischen Flora. Gentianaceae. Bulletin de l'Herbier Boissier 6 : 714 746.
38. Schoen DJ, Busch JW. 2008. On the evolution of self-fertilization in a metapopulation. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169 : 119 127.
39. Stebbins GL. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
40. Steets JA, Ashman T-L. 2004. Herbivory alters the expression of a mixed-mating system. American Journal of Botany 91 : 1046 1051.
41. Strauss SY, Whittall JB. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In : Harder LD, Barrett SCH, eds. The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 120 138.
42. Takebayashi N, Morell PL. 2001. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 88 : 1143 1150.
43. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal w: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22 : 4673 4680.
44. Vijayaraghavan MR, Padmanaban U. 1968. Morphology and embryology of Centaurium ramosissimum Druce and affinities of the family Gentianaceae. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 46 : 15 37.
45. Walker DB. 1975. Postgenital carpel fusion in Catharanthus roseus (Apocynaceae). 1. Light and scanning electron-microscopic study of gynoecial ontogeny. American Journal of Botany 62 : 457 467.
46. Wilgenbusch JC, Warren DL, Swofford DL. 2004. AWTY: a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference. http://ceb.csit.fsu.edu/awty.
47. Yuan YM, Wohlhauser S, Moller M, Chassot P, Mansion G, Grant J, Küpfer P, Klackenberg J. 2003. Monophyly and relationships of the tribe Exaceae (Gentianaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28 : 500 517.
48. Yuan YM, Wohlhauser S, Moller M, Klackenberg J, Callmander M, Küpfer P. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of Exacum (Gentianaceae): a disjunctive distribution in the Indian Ocean basin resulted from long distance dispersal and extensive radiation. Systematic Biology 54 : 21 34.