Effect of variation in herkogamy on outcrossing within a population of Gilia achilleifolia

Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-165

  Takebayashi, N ^a,b   Wolf, D E ^a,b   Delph, L F ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

Autogamy; Floral design; Herkogamy; Plant mating systems; Temporal variation; Variation in outcrossing rate

Indexed keywords

ENZYME;

OUTCROSSING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOSPERMS; ENZYMES; GENETICS, POPULATION; REPRODUCTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

GILIA ACHILLEIFOLIA;

EID: 31544459521     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800780     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Baker HG (1955). Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long distance' dispersal. Evolution 9: 347-349.
2. Barrett SCH (2003). Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Phil Trans R Soc London, Series B, Biological Sciences 358: 991-1004.
3. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG (1990). Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In: Kawano S (ed) Biological Approaches and Evolutionary Trends in Plants. Academic Press: New York, NY, USA. pp 229-254.
4. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Cole WW (1994). Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Functional Ecology 8: 526-535.
5. Barrett SCH, Husband BC, Cole WW (1993). Variation in outcrossing rates in Eichhornia paniculata: Temporal changes in populations of contrasting style morph structure. Plant Species Biology 8: 141-148.
6. Becker HC, Damgaard C, Karlsson B (1992). Environmental variation for outcrossing rate in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Theor Appl Genet 84: 303-306.
7. Belaoussoff S, Shore JS (1995). Floral correlates and fitness consequences of mating-system variation in Turnera ulmifolia. Evolution 49: 545-556.
8. Brown AHD, Allard RW (1970). Estimates of the mating systems in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66: 133-145.
9. Brunet J, Eckert CG (1998). Effects of floral morphology and display on outcrossing in blue columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Functional Ecology 12: 596-606.
10. Carr DE, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (1997). The relationship between mating-system characters and inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 363-372.
11. Cruzan MB, Hamrick JL, Arnold ML, Bennett BD (1994). Mating-system variation in hybridizing irises: effects of phenology and floral densities on family outcrossing rates. Heredity 72: 95-105.
12. Darwin CR (1876). The Effect of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murray: London.
13. El-Kassaby YA, Meagher MD, Davidson R (1993). Temporal variation in the outcrossing rate in a natural stand of Wesetern white-pine. Silvae Genetica 42: 131-135.
14. Fetscher AE (2001). Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. Proc R Soc London Series B 268: 525-529.
15. Galen C, Gregory T, Galloway LF (1989). Costs of self-pollination in a self-incompatible plant, Polemonium viscosum. Am J Botany 76: 1675-1680.
16. Grant V, Grant KA (1965). Flower Pollination in the Phlox Family. Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA.
17. Hebert PDN, Beaton MJ (1989). Methodologies for Allozyme Analysis Using Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Helena Laboratories: Beaumont, Texas.
18. Holtsford TP, Ellstrand NC (1989). Variation in outcrossing rate and population genetic structure of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Theor Appl Genet 78: 480-488.
19. Holtsford TP, Ellstrand NC (1992). Genetic and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution 46: 216-225.
20. Humphreys MO, Gale JS (1974). Variation in wild populations of Papaver dubium. VIII. The mating system. Heredity 33: 33-41.
21. Ivey CT, Wyatt R (1999). Family outcrossing rates and neighborhood floral density in natural populations of swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata): potential statistical artifacts. Theor Appl Genet 98: 1063-1071.
22. Kalisz S, Vogler DW (2003). Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84: 2928-2942.
23. Karron JD, Thumser NN, Tucker R, Hessenauer AJ (1995). The influence of population density on outcrossing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75: 175-180.
24. Kesseli RW, Jain SK (1985). Breeding systems and population structure in Limnanthes. Theor Appl Genet 71: 292-299.
25. Kimura M (1959). Conflict between self-fertilization and outbreeding in plants. Annual Report National Institute of Genetics Japan 9: 87-88.
26. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ (1993). Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos 66: 180-184.
27. Kreitman M, Hudson RR (1991). Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 127: 565-582.
28. Kunin WE (1993). Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74: 2145-2160.
29. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
30. Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1986). The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand J Botany 24: 135-162.
31. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984). Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Rev Ecology and Systematics 15: 65-95.
32. Miyashita NT (2001). DNA variation in the 5′ upstream region of the Adh locus of the wild plants Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabis gemmifera. Mol Biol Evolution 18: 164-171.
33. Moran GF, Brown AHD (1980). Temporal heterogeneity of outcrossing rate in alpine ash (Eucalyptus delegatensis RT Bak). Theor Appl Genet 57: 101-105.
34. Morgan MT, Barrett SCH (1990). Outcrossing rates and correlated mating within a population of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity 64: 271-280.
35. Motten AF, Stone JL (2000). Heritability of stigma position and the effect of stigma-anther separation on outcrossing in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). Am J Botany 87: 339-347.
36. Mutikainen P, Delph LF (1998). Inbreeding depression in a gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52: 1572-1582.
37. Rao GY, Widen B, Andersson S (2002). Patterns of inbreeding depression in a population of Brassica cretica (brassicaceae): Evidence from family-level analyses. Biological J Linnean Soc 76: 317-325.
38. Richardson BJ, Baverstock PR, Adams M (1986). Allozyme Electrophoresis: A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies. Academic Press: Sydney.
39. Rick CM, Fobes JF, Holle M (1977). Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Plant Systematics and Evolution 127: 139-170.
40. Rick CM, Holle M, Thorp RW (1978). Rates of cross-pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Impact of genetic variation in floral characters. Plant Systematics and Evolution 129: 31-44.
41. Ritland K (1988). The genetic-mating structure of subdivided populations. II. Correlated mating models. Theor Population Biol 34: 320-346.
42. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
43. Ritland K, Ganders FR (1985). Variation in the mating system of Bidens menziesii (Asteraceae) in relation to population substructure. Heredity 55: 235-244.
44. Ritland K, Jain S (1981). A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47: 35-52.
45. Sakai S, Ishii HS (1999). Why be completely outcrossing? Evolutionarily stable outcrossing strategies in an environment where outcross-pollen availability is unpredictable. Evolutionary Ecology Res 1: 211-222.
46. Savolainen O, Langley CH, Lazzaro B, Freville H (2000). Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in the outcrossing Arabidopsis lyrata and the selfing Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol 17: 645-655.
47. Schoen DJ (1982a). The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36: 352-360.
48. Schoen DJ (1982b). Genetic variation and the breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia. Evolution 36: 361-370.
49. Schultz ST, Willis JH (1995). Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141: 1209-1223.
50. Snow AA, Spica TP, Simpson R, Klips RA (1996). The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman and Hall: New York. pp 191-216.
51. Stephenson AG, Good SV, Vogler DW (2000). Interrelationships among inbreeding depression, plasticity in the self-incompatibility system, and the breeding system of Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae). Ann Botany 85: 211-219.
52. Stone JL, Motten AF (2002). Anther-stigma separation is associated with inbreeding depression in Datura stramonium, a perdominantly self-fertilizing annual. Evolution 56: 2187-2195.
53. Takebayashi N, Delph LF (2000). An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression. Evolution 54: 840-846.
54. Takebayashi N, Morrell PL (2001). Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. Am J Botany 88: 1143-1150.
55. Ushimaru A, Nakata K (2002). The evolution of flower allometry in selfing species. Evolutionary Ecology Res 4: 1217-1227.
56. Uyenoyama MK, Waller DM (1991). Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theoretical Population Biol 40: 14-46.
57. Vogler DW, Filmore K, Stephenson AG (1999). Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. J Evolutionary Biol 12: 483-494.
58. Vrieling K, Saumitou-Laprade P, Cuguen J, van Dijk H, de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL (1999). Direct and indirect estimates of the selfing rate in small and large individuals of the bumblebee pollinated Cynoglossum officinale L (Boraginaceae). Ecology Lett 2: 331-337.
59. Waser NM, Price MV (1991). Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Am J Botany 78: 1036-1043.
60. Webb CJ, Lloyd DG (1986). The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. New Zealand J Botany 24: 163-178.
61. Willson MF, Burley N (1983). Mate Choice in Plants: Tactics, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
62. Wright S, Lauga B, Charlesworth D (2002). Rates and patterns of molecular evolution in inbred and outbred Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1407-1420.